Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Programmed Necrosis, Not Apoptosis, in the Heart

Open access
Kung, Gloria, Konstantinidis, Klitos, Kitsis, Richard N.·2011·Circulation Research

Abstract

It is well known that apoptosis is an actively mediated cell suicide process. In contrast, necrosis, a morphologically distinct form of cell death, has traditionally been regarded as passive and unregulated. Over the past decade, however, experiments in Caenorhabditis elegans and mammalian cells have revealed that a significant proportion of necrotic death is, in fact, actively mediated by the doomed cell. Although a comprehensive understanding of necrosis is still lacking, some key molecular events have come into focus. Cardiac myocyte apoptosis and necrosis are prominent features of the major cardiac syndromes. Accordingly, the recognition of necrosis as a regulated process mandates a reexamination of cell death in the heart. This review discusses pathways that mediate programmed necrosis, how they intersect with apoptotic pathways, roles of necrosis in heart disease, and new therapeutic opportunities that the regulated nature of necrosis presents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.110.225730

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Kung, G., Konstantinidis, K., & Kitsis, R. N.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2011-04-15
Volume
108
Issue
8
Pages
1017-1036
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2118053403
Cited by
291
References
26
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.