Cited by 832Cell death mechanisms and regulationAutophagy in Disease and TherapyDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Cell death modalities: classification and pathophysiological implications

Galluzzi, L, Maiuri, M C, Vitale, I, Zischka, H, Castedo, M, Zitvogel, L, Kroemer, G·2007·Cell Death & Differentiation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402148

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cell death has historically been classified into three morphological forms: type I apoptosis, type II autophagy, and type III necrosis.

    “Together with the mechanisms whereby dead cells and their fragments are disposed of, such morphotypes have historically been employed to classify cell death into three different forms: (1) type I cell death or apoptosis, exhibiting cytoplasmic shrinkage, chromatin condensation (pyknosis), nuclear fragmentation (karyorrhexis), and plasma membrane blebbing, culminating with the formation of apparent”
  • Evidence is accumulating that necrotic cell death may be regulated by signal transduction pathways and catabolic mechanisms.

    “Nonetheless, evidence is accumulating that the execution of necrotic cell death may be subtly regulated by a set of signal transduction pathways and catabolic mechanisms 111,112.”

    From Immunogenic and tolerogenic cell death (2009) · cites this paper as [111]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galluzzi, L., Maiuri, M. C., Vitale, I., Zischka, H., Castedo, M., Zitvogel, L., & Kroemer, G.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Kroemer, G
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2007-04-13
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
1237-1243
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W2013705864
Cited by
832
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 48
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
cell death, apoptosis, necrosis, autophagic cell death, caspase activation, cathepsins, immunogenic cell death, programmed cell death
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Enzymes, Humans, Mitosis, Necrosis, Signal Transduction, Cell Death, Apoptosis, Cytoprotection, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review