Cited by 50Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementDiabetes Treatment and Management

Pioglitazone for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: Rationale and design of the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke Trial

Open access
Viscoli, Catherine M., Brass, Lawrence M., Carolei, Antonio, Conwit, Robin, Ford, Gary A., Furie, Karen L., Gorman, Mark, Guarino, Peter D. +10 more·2014·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Background Recurrent vascular events remain a major source of morbidity and mortality after stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The IRIS Trial is evaluating an approach to secondary prevention based on the established association between insulin resistance and increased risk for ischemic vascular events. Specifically, IRIS will test the effectiveness of pioglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing drug of the thiazolidinedione class, for reducing the risk for stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) among insulin resistant, nondiabetic patients with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA.Design Eligible patients for IRIS must have had insulin resistance defined by a Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance > 3.0 without meeting criteria for diabetes. Within 6 months of the index stroke or TIA, patients were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (titrated from 15 to 45 mg/d) or matching placebo and followed for up to 5 years. The primary outcome is time to stroke or MI. Secondary outcomes include time to stroke alone, acute coronary syndrome, diabetes, cognitive decline, and all-cause mortality. Enrollment of 3,876 participants from 179 sites in 7 countries was completed in January 2013. Participant follow-up will continue until July 2015.Summary The IRIS Trial will determine whether treatment with pioglitazone improves cardiovascular outcomes of nondiabetic, insulin-resistant patients with stroke or TIA. Results are expected in early 2016.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.016

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viscoli, C. M., Brass, L. M., Carolei, A., Conwit, R., Ford, G. A., Furie, K. L., Gorman, M., Guarino, P. D., Inzucchi, S. E., Lovejoy, A. M., Parsons, M. W., Peduzzi, P. N., Ringleb, P. A., Schwartz, G. G., Spence, J. D., Tanne, D., Young, L. H., & Kernan, W. N.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Denver VA Medical Center (US)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Viscoli, Catherine M.
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
168
Issue
6
Pages
823-829.e6
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053853324
Cited by
50
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10089)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000142, UL1TR000439)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS044876)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
pioglitazone, insulin resistance, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, secondary prevention, thiazolidinediones, IRIS trial, stroke recurrence, myocardial infarction, non-diabetic patients, cardiovascular outcomes, cognitive decline, acute coronary syndrome
MeSH terms
Pioglitazone, Adult, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Cognition Disorders, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Risk Assessment, Stroke, Thiazolidinediones, Secondary Prevention, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review