Cited by 166Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Gamma abnormalities during perception of illusory figures in autism

Brown, Caroline, Gruber, Thomas, Boucher, Jill, Rippon, Gina, Brock, Jon·2005·Cortex

Abstract

This experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that perceptual abnormalities in autism might be associated with alteration of induced gamma activity patterns overlying visual cortical regions. EEG was recorded from six adolescents with autism and eight controls matched on chronological age, and verbal and nonverbal mental age, whilst identifying the presence or absence of an illusory Kanizsa shape. Although there were no reaction time or accuracy differences between the groups there were significant task-related differences in cortical activity. Control participants showed typical gamma-band activity over parietal regions at around 350 msec post onset of shape trials, similar to gamma patterns found in previous studies with non-impaired adults. In contrast, autistic participants showed overall increased activity, including an early 100 msec gamma peak and a late induced peak, 50 to 70 msec earlier than that shown by the control group. We interpret the abnormal gamma activity to reflect decreased "signal to noise" due to decreased inhibitory processing. In this experiment we did not establish a link between altered perception and abnormal gamma, as the autistic participants' behaviour did not differ from the controls. Future work should be designed to replicate this phenomenon and establish the perceptual consequences of altered gamma activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70273-9

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, C., Gruber, T., Boucher, J., Rippon, G., & Brock, J.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Caroline
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
364-376
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030713803
Cited by
166
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
British Psychological Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, gamma oscillations, illusory contours, Kanizsa figures, visual perception, parietal cortex, signal-to-noise ratio, inhibitory processes, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Child, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Male, Optical Illusions, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review