The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Open accessAbstract
Many if not most markets with network externalities are two-sided. To succeed, platforms in industries such as software, portals and media, payment systems and the Internet, must “get both sides of the market on board.” Accordingly, platforms devote much attention to their business model, that is, to how they court each side while making money overall. This paper builds a model of platform competition with two-sided markets. It unveils the determinants of price allocation and end-user surplus for different governance structures (profit-maximizing platforms and not-for-profit joint undertakings), and compares the outcomes with those under an integrated monopolist and a Ramsey planner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Since network effects are present in most platform markets, the nonlinear properties of network effects create a dynamic situation in multi-platform spaces.”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Rochet and Tirole 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“By acting as matchmaking intermediaries with strong network effects (Rochet and Tirole, 2003), platforms reduce the search costs of accessing specialized content, from social connections (Van Dijck, 2013) to products in the gig economy (Scholz, 2017; Van Doorn, 2017; Wachsmuth and Weisler, 2018), yet this infrastructure of intermediation is by no means neutral (Gillespie, 2010, 2017).”
From Google Arts & Culture and the platformization of cultural heritage: Convergence, gamification, and shifting positions of institutional partners (2026) · cites this paper as Rochet and Tirole, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Due to network interaction, individual actors' choices affect other actors' value (Jacobides et al., 2024;Rochet & Tirole, 2003)”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Rochet & Tirole, 2003
In the citing paper
“While conventional inter-firm competition focuses on moves and counter-moves as strategic actions that enable rivaling firms to capture greater shares of a given market value, platform competition reshapes markets as a whole (Rochet & Tirole, 2003).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Rochet & Tirole, 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility
Katz, M. L. (1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,052
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261409 · Cited by 2,622
Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555589 · Cited by 2,554
Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation
Farrell, J. P., & Saloner, G. (1986) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,547
A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service
Rohlfs, J. H. (1974) · The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science · doi:10.2307/3003090 · Cited by 1,019
Information Gatekeepers on the Internet and the Competitiveness of Homogeneous Product Markets
Baye, M. R., & Morgan, J. W. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.3.454 · Cited by 631
Payment Systems and Interchange Fees
Schmalensee, R. (2002) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00170 · Cited by 275
Internet Interconnection and the Off-Net-Cost Pricing Principle
Laffont, J., Marcus, S., Rey, P., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593723 · Cited by 205
The Antitrust Economics of Two-Sided MarketsPreprint
Evans, D. S. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.332022 · Cited by 176
Ownership and Control Rights in Internet Portal Alliances, 1995-1999
Elfenbein, D. W., & Lerner, J. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593722 · Cited by 129
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 1982, Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure.
- 2003, On the Receiver Pays Principle, Rand Journal of Economics
- 2001, Competing with Network Externalities and Price Competition
- 2000, Information Complements, Substitutes, and Strategic Product Design
- 2002, Cooperation among Competitors: The Economics of Payment Card Associations., Rand Journal of Economics, 33, 1
- 2000, Competition between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages
- 1993, Nonlinear Pricing.
- 1996, Are Advertisers Ready to Pay Viewers, Wall Street Journal
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,007
Platform intermediation in a market for differentiated products
Galeotti, A., & Moraga‐González, J. L. (2008) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.08.003 · Cited by 72
Innovation EcosystemsPreprint
Thomas, L. D. W., & Autio, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3476925 · Cited by 78
Platform strategies and user stickiness in the online video industry
Rong, K., Xiao, F., Zhang, X., & Wang, J. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.023 · Cited by 71
Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., & Tuertscher, P. (2021) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12555 · Cited by 71
Power dynamics in software platform ecosystems
Hurni, T., Huber, T., & Dibbern, J. (2021) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12356 · Cited by 83
Superstar Exclusivity in Two-Sided Markets
Carroni, E., Madio, L., & Shekhar, S. (2023) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.4720 · Cited by 71
The influence of developer multi-homing on competition between software ecosystems
Hyrynsalmi, S., Suominen, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2015) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.053 · Cited by 71
Roma, P., & Ragaglia, D. (2016) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2016.04.007 · Cited by 72
Digital strategies for two-sided markets: A case study of shopping malls
Frishammar, J., Cenamor, J., Cavalli-Björkman, H., Hernell, E., & Carlsson, J. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.02.003 · Cited by 71
When Does a Platform Create Value by Limiting Choice?
Casadesus‐Masanell, R., & Hałaburda, H. (2014) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/jems.12052 · Cited by 71
In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Multi-Level Theory for Supplier Participation on Digital Platforms
Kathuria, A., Karhade, P. P., & Konsynski, B. R. (2020) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2020.1759349 · Cited by 71
MULTISIDED PLATFORMS AND MARKETS: A SURVEY OF THE THEORETICAL LITERATURE
Sanchez-Cartas, J. M., & León, G. (2021) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12409 · Cited by 70
An apple a day – how the platform economy impacts value creation in the healthcare market
Gleiß, A., Kohlhagen, M., & Pousttchi, K. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00467-2 · Cited by 78
Heavily skewed pricing in two-sided markets
Bolt, W., & Tieman, A. F. (2007) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.11.003 · Cited by 70
An invitation to market design
Kominers, S. D., Teytelboym, A., & Crawford, V. P. (2017) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx063 · Cited by 73
Yablonsky, S. (2018) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2544 · Cited by 70
Commercialization of Platform Technologies: Launch Timing and Versioning Strategy
Bhargava, H. K., Kim, B. C., & Sun, D. (2012) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01344.x · Cited by 70
The Digital Sin City: An Empirical Study of Craigslist’s Impact on Prostitution Trends
Chan, J., Mojumder, P., & Ghose, A. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0799 · Cited by 69
Ethical aspects of multi-stakeholder recommendation systems
Milano, S., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2020.1832636 · Cited by 81
, Algorithmic Management in the Platform Economy
Stark, D., & Pais, I. (2021) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/12221 · Cited by 180
Entry of FinTech Firms and Competition in the Retail Payments Market
Jun, J., & Yeo, E. (2016) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.1111/ajfs.12126 · Cited by 69
Investment in Two Sided Markets and the Net Neutrality DebatePreprint
Njoroge, P., Ozdaglar, A., Stier‐Moses, N. E., & Weintraub, G. Y. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1641359 · Cited by 69
Dead poets' property—how does copyright influence price?
Li, X., MacGarvie, M. J., & Moser, P. (2018) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12223 · Cited by 68
From Automobile Capitalism to Platform Capitalism: Toyotism as a prehistory of digital platforms
Steinberg, M. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406211030681 · Cited by 73
Muthukannan, P., Tan, B. C. C., Tan, F. T. C., & Leong, C. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102403 · Cited by 84
Data-driven forwarding: a typology of digital platforms for road freight transport management
Heinbach, C., Beinke, J. H., Kammler, F., & Thomas, O. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00540-4 · Cited by 68
The streaming industry and the platform economy: An analysis
Chalaby, J. K. (2023) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437231210439 · Cited by 115
Proskuryakova, L. N., Meissner, D., & Борисович, Р. П. (2014) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9373-8 · Cited by 68
Joining a smartphone ecosystem: Application developers' motivations and decision criteria
Koch, S., & Kerschbaum, M. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.03.010 · Cited by 64
Risks and Rewards of Crowdsourcing Marketplaces
Chandler, J., Paolacci, G., & Mueller, P. A. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8806-4_30 · Cited by 73
Dynamic pricing in ridesharing platforms
Banerjee, S., Ramesh Johari, B., & Riquelme, C. (2016) · ACM SIGecom Exchanges · doi:10.1145/2994501.2994505 · Cited by 66
What is in it for us? Network effects and bank payment innovation
Milne, A. K. L. (2005) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.09.006 · Cited by 91
Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2022) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20200134 · Cited by 68
Natural Monopolies in Digital Platform Markets
Ducci, F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108867528 · Cited by 70
Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon. com
PARKER, G. G., Petropoulos, G., & Alstyne, M. V. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.1093/icc/dtab048 · Cited by 67
Reuter, E. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2939 · Cited by 68
How do Big Bang Disruptors look like? A Business Model perspective
Trabucchi, D., Talenti, L., & Buganza, T. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.009 · Cited by 67
Son, Y., Kwon, H. E., Tayi, G. K., & Oh, W. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1066 · Cited by 68
Upward Pricing Pressure in Two‐sided Markets
Affeldt, P., Filistrucchi, L., & Klein, T. J. (2013) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12050 · Cited by 67
Digital platforms for the co-creation of public value
Meijer, A., & Boon, W. (2021) · Policy & Politics · doi:10.1332/030557321x16115951032181 · Cited by 77
Regulating the Sharing Economy: A Field Perspective
Kirchner, S., & Schüßler, E. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000066010 · Cited by 66
de Reuver, M., van Wynsberghe, A., Janssen, M., & van de Poel, I. (2020) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09537-z · Cited by 66
The Janus faces of Silicon Valley
Atal, M. (2020) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1830830 · Cited by 64
PLATFORM COMPETITION WITH ENDOGENOUS HOMING
Jeitschko, T. D., & Tremblay, M. J. (2020) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12457 · Cited by 66
Karaer, Ö., & Erhun, F. (2014) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.016 · Cited by 66
Designing business models for cloud platforms
Giessmann, A., & Legner, C. (2016) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12107 · Cited by 67
Pon, B., Seppälä, T., & Kenney, M. F. (2014) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.05.001 · Cited by 67
Beyond Personalization: Research Directions in Multistakeholder RecommendationPreprint
Abdollahpouri, H., Adomavičius, G., Burke, R., Guy, I., Jannach, D., Kamishima, T., Krasnodebski, J., & Pizzato, L. A. S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.01986 · Cited by 66
Platform StrategyPreprint
PARKER, G. G., & Alstyne, M. V. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2439323 · Cited by 66
Peer-to-Peer Service Sharing Platforms: Driving Share and Share Alike on a Mass-Scale
Andersson, M., Hjalmarsson, A., & Avital, M. (2013) · Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås) · Cited by 65
Lin, X., Sun, C., Cao, B., Zhou, Y., & Chen, C. (2020) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2020.102309 · Cited by 65
Inoue, Y. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120652 · Cited by 65
Business model choices for value creation of mobile services
Methlie, L. B., & Pedersen, P. E. (2007) · Info · doi:10.1108/14636690710816462 · Cited by 65
Advertising or Freemium: The Impacts of Social Effects and Service Quality on Competing Platforms
Li, Z., Nan, G., & Li, M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2018.2871420 · Cited by 65
Regulation of Natural MonopolyPreprint
Joskow, P. L. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 65
Taxation of a digital monopoly platform
Bourreau, M., Caillaud, B., & de Nijs, R. (2017) · Journal of Public Economic Theory · doi:10.1111/jpet.12255 · Cited by 64
The social lives of network effects: Speculation and risk in Jakarta's platform economy
Nowak, S. (2021) · Environment and Planning · doi:10.1177/0308518x211056953 · Cited by 34
On-Demand Ride-Matching in a Spatial Model with Abandonment and Cancellation
Wang, G., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.2022.2399 · Cited by 64
The role of complementary products on platform adoption: Evidence from the video console market
Cenamor, J., Usero, B., & Fernández, Z. (2013) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.007 · Cited by 68
Disruptive Entrepreneurship and Dual Purpose Strategies: The Case of Uber
Baron, D. P. (2018) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2018.0059 · Cited by 64
Market Failure in Kidney Exchange
Agarwal, N., Itai Ashlagi, A., Azevedo, E. M., Featherstone, C. R., & Karaduman, Ö. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180771 · Cited by 64
The Economics of Internet Markets
Levin, J. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16852 · Cited by 64
Codagnone, C., Fabienne, A., & Biagi, F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2784774 · Cited by 66
Rong, K., Shi, Y., Shang, T., Chen, Y., & Hao, H. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.042 · Cited by 63
Sponsored Content Advertising in a Two-Sided Market
Chatterjee, P., & Zhou, B. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3873 · Cited by 60
Huang, L., Dou, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Chen, G., Zhang, X., & Wang, R. (2021) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2021.08.006 · Cited by 63
Teh, T. (2019) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20190307 · Cited by 63
When Does the Winner Take All in Two-Sided Markets?
Sun, M., & Tse, E. T. S. (2007) · Review of Network Economics · doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1108 · Cited by 63
Value Networks and Changing Business Models for the Digital Television Industry
Evens, T. (2010) · Journal of Media Business Studies · doi:10.1080/16522354.2010.11073514 · Cited by 63
Designed entrepreneurial legitimacy: the case of a Swedish crowdfunding platform
Bogusz, C. I., Teigland, R., & Vaast, E. (2018) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2018.1534039 · Cited by 71
Electricity Market Empowered by Artificial Intelligence: A Platform Approach
Xu, Y., Ahokangas, P., Louis, J.-N., & Pongrácz, É. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12214128 · Cited by 65
Abdelkafi, N., Raasch, C., Roth, A., & Srinivasan, R. (2019) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00385-4 · Cited by 63
Liu, Y., Chen, D. Q., & Gao, W. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.027 · Cited by 66
Park, H., Kim, S., Jeong, Y., & Minshall, T. (2020) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12404 · Cited by 76
Two-part tariff competition between two-sided platforms
Reisinger, M. (2014) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.03.005 · Cited by 63
Liu, H., Xue-rong, L., & Wang, S. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120827 · Cited by 63
Haftor, D. M., Costa Climent, R., & Lundström, J. E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.015 · Cited by 60
Rabassa, V., Sabri, O., & Spaletta, C. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121292 · Cited by 63
Sui, R., Zhang, X., Dan, B., Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2022) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.041 · Cited by 62
Digital platforms for food waste reduction: The value for business users
Amaral, D. G., & Orsato, R. J. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3193 · Cited by 67
Who Benefits From Surge Pricing?
Castillo, J. C. (2018) · Econometrica · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3245533 · Cited by 62
Transaction Pricing and the Adoption of Electronic Payments: A Cross-Country Comparison
Bolt, W., Humphrey, D. B., & Uittenbogaard, R. (2012) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 62
The Economics of Digital Business Models: A Framework for Analyzing the Economics of Platforms
Brousseau, É., & Pénard, T. (2007) · Review of Network Economics · doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1112 · Cited by 68
The transition to digital television
Adda, J., & Ottaviani, M. (2005) · Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0327.2005.00135.x · Cited by 62
Airport Incentive Programmes: A European Perspective
Malina, R. M., Albers, S., & Kroll, N. (2012) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2012.684223 · Cited by 69
Regulation and Competition Policy in the Banking Sector
Carletti, E., & Vives, X. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566358.003.0010 · Cited by 62
Time-Dependent Broadband Pricing: Feasibility and Benefits
Joe‐Wong, C., Ha, S., & Chiang, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems/Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2011.81 · Cited by 62
ICT platforms and regulatory concerns in Europe
Ballon, P., & Heesvelde, E. V. (2011) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.009 · Cited by 62
Network competition and interconnection with heterogeneous subscribers
Hahn, J. (2004) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.01.002 · Cited by 62
Software Exclusivity and the Scope of Indirect Network Effects in the U.S. Home Video Game MarketPreprint
Corts, K. S., & Lederman, M. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1029856 · Cited by 62
Three characteristics of technology competition by IoT-driven digitization
Ahn, S. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120062 · Cited by 61
Internet of things (IoT) platform competition: Consumer switching versus provider multihoming
Basaure, A., Vesselkov, A., & Töyli, J. (2019) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102101 · Cited by 65
Optimal Commissions and Subscriptions in Networked Markets
Birge, J. R., Candogan, O., Chen, H., & Sabán, D. (2018) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2019.0853 · Cited by 61
Beuscart, J.-S., & Flichy, P. (2018) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.212.0009 · Cited by 61
Theory of Credit Card Networks: A Survey of the Literature
Chakravorti, S. “. (2003) · Review of Network Economics · doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1018 · Cited by 61
Brunswicker, S., Almirall, E., & Majchrzak, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13561 · Cited by 59
Personal Data Spaces: An Intervention in Surveillance Capitalism?
Lehtiniemi, T. (2017) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v15i5.6424 · Cited by 62
How Much to Share with Third Parties? User Privacy Concerns and Website Dilemmas1
Gopal, R. D., Hidaji, H., Patterson, R. A., Rolland, É., & Zhdanov, D. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/13839 · Cited by 60
Network Interconnectivity and Entry into Platform Markets
Zhu, F., Li, X., Valavi, E., & Iansiti, M. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1010 · Cited by 62
Digitization and the evolution of money as a social technology of account
Peneder, M. (2021) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-021-00729-4 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J.
- Affiliations
- Institut d'Économie Industrielle (FR)
- ORCID
- Rochet, Jean-Charles
- Venue
- Journal of the European Economic Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 990-1029
- ISSN
- 1542-4766 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-4774
- OpenAlex
- W1516051863
- Cited by
- 5,642
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 477 · 2025: 384 · 2024: 338 · 2023: 408 · 2022: 411 · 2021: 424 · 2020: 415 · 2019: 374 · 2018: 330 · 2017: 247 · 2016: 238 · 2015: 207 · 2014: 182 · 2013: 188 · 2012: 178
- FWCI
- 259.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.idref.fr
- Locations
- Journal of the European Economic Association (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole) (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- platform competition, two-sided markets, network effects, platform business models, platform governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
