The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Open accessAbstract
Many if not most markets with network externalities are two-sided. To succeed, platforms in industries such as software, portals and media, payment systems and the Internet, must “get both sides of the market on board.” Accordingly, platforms devote much attention to their business model, that is, to how they court each side while making money overall. This paper builds a model of platform competition with two-sided markets. It unveils the determinants of price allocation and end-user surplus for different governance structures (profit-maximizing platforms and not-for-profit joint undertakings), and compares the outcomes with those under an integrated monopolist and a Ramsey planner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Since network effects are present in most platform markets, the nonlinear properties of network effects create a dynamic situation in multi-platform spaces.”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Rochet and Tirole 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“By acting as matchmaking intermediaries with strong network effects (Rochet and Tirole, 2003), platforms reduce the search costs of accessing specialized content, from social connections (Van Dijck, 2013) to products in the gig economy (Scholz, 2017; Van Doorn, 2017; Wachsmuth and Weisler, 2018), yet this infrastructure of intermediation is by no means neutral (Gillespie, 2010, 2017).”
From Google Arts & Culture and the platformization of cultural heritage: Convergence, gamification, and shifting positions of institutional partners (2026) · cites this paper as Rochet and Tirole, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Due to network interaction, individual actors' choices affect other actors' value (Jacobides et al., 2024;Rochet & Tirole, 2003)”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Rochet & Tirole, 2003
In the citing paper
“While conventional inter-firm competition focuses on moves and counter-moves as strategic actions that enable rivaling firms to capture greater shares of a given market value, platform competition reshapes markets as a whole (Rochet & Tirole, 2003).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Rochet & Tirole, 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility
Katz, M. L. (1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,052
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261409 · Cited by 2,622
Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555589 · Cited by 2,554
Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation
Farrell, J. P., & Saloner, G. (1986) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,547
A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service
Rohlfs, J. H. (1974) · The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science · doi:10.2307/3003090 · Cited by 1,019
Information Gatekeepers on the Internet and the Competitiveness of Homogeneous Product Markets
Baye, M. R., & Morgan, J. W. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.3.454 · Cited by 631
Payment Systems and Interchange Fees
Schmalensee, R. (2002) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00170 · Cited by 275
Internet Interconnection and the Off-Net-Cost Pricing Principle
Laffont, J., Marcus, S., Rey, P., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593723 · Cited by 205
The Antitrust Economics of Two-Sided MarketsPreprint
Evans, D. S. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.332022 · Cited by 176
Ownership and Control Rights in Internet Portal Alliances, 1995-1999
Elfenbein, D. W., & Lerner, J. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593722 · Cited by 129
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 1982, Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure.
- 2003, On the Receiver Pays Principle, Rand Journal of Economics
- 2001, Competing with Network Externalities and Price Competition
- 2000, Information Complements, Substitutes, and Strategic Product Design
- 2002, Cooperation among Competitors: The Economics of Payment Card Associations., Rand Journal of Economics, 33, 1
- 2000, Competition between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages
- 1993, Nonlinear Pricing.
- 1996, Are Advertisers Ready to Pay Viewers, Wall Street Journal
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,007
The Role of Interchange Fees in Two-Sided Markets: An Empirical Investigation on Payment Cards
Valverde, S. C., Chakravorti, S. “., & Fernández, F. R. (2015) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00502 · Cited by 42
On the Evolution of Market Institutions: The Platform Design Paradox
Alós‐Ferrer, C., Kirchsteiger, G., & Walzl, M. (2009) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02297.x · Cited by 42
(2018) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78743-809-520181009 · Cited by 42
Hänninen, M., & Smedlund, A. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12701 · Cited by 42
Tolio, T. A. M., Monostori, L., Váncza, J., & Sauer, O. (2023) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2023.04.091 · Cited by 41
Value creation in data-centric B2B platforms: A model based on multiple case studies
Mancuso, I., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Panniello, U. (2024) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.04.001 · Cited by 42
Economic modeling of innovation in the creative industries and its implications
Bae, S. H., & Yoo, K. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.010 · Cited by 41
Distributional Comparative Statics
Jensen, M. K. (2017) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdx021 · Cited by 41
Internet-of-things market, value networks, and business models : state of the art report
Okkonen, H., Mazhelis, O., Ahokangas, P., Pussinen, P., Rajahonka, M., Siuruainen, R., Leminen, S., Shveykovskiy, A., Myllykoski, J., & Warma, H. (2013) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) · Cited by 41
Managerial capabilities to address digital business models: The case of digital health
Gauthier, C., Bastianutti, J., & Haggège, M. (2018) · Strategic Change · doi:10.1002/jsc.2192 · Cited by 46
Priem, R. L., Krause, R. A., Tantalo, C., & McFadyen, M. A. (2019) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2018.0048 · Cited by 41
Ideological Bias and Trust in Information Sources
Gentzkow, M. A., Wong, M. B., & Zhang, A. T. (2025) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20210406 · Cited by 41
Economic patterns in a world with artificial intelligence
Wagner, D. (2020) · Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review · doi:10.1007/s40844-019-00157-x · Cited by 32
Haftor, D., & Climent, R. C. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.022 · Cited by 41
Platform entry and homing as competitive strategies under cross-sided network effects
Wu, C., & Chamnisampan, N. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113428 · Cited by 41
The rise of the sharing economy
Basselier, R., Langenus, G., & Walravens, L. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 41
Platform Search Design: The Roles of Precision and Price
Zhong, Z. (2022) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2022.1370 · Cited by 41
Developing design principles to standardize e-commerce ecosystems
Wulfert, T., Woroch, R., Strobel, G., Seufert, S., & Möller, F. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00558-8 · Cited by 53
Iansiti, M., & Zhu, F. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 41
Sociologie des activités en ligne (introduction)
Beuscart, J.-S., Dagiral, É., & Parasie, S. (2009) · Terrains & travaux · doi:10.3917/tt.015.0003 · Cited by 41
Investment Incentives in Open‐Source and Proprietary Two‐Sided Platforms
Casadesus‐Masanell, R., & Llanes, G. (2015) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/jems.12089 · Cited by 43
Subsidization Competition: Vitalizing the Neutral Internet
Ma, R. T. B. (2015) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2015.2466603 · Cited by 40
Idle Asset Hunters—The Secret of Multi-sided Platforms
Trabucchi, D., Sanasi, S., Ghezzi, A., & Buganza, T. (2021) · Research-Technology Management · doi:10.1080/08956308.2021.1842677 · Cited by 40
Designing Distributed Ledger technologies, like Blockchain, for advertising markets
Joo, M., Kim, S. H., Ghose, A., & Wilbur, K. C. (2022) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.08.004 · Cited by 40
Paradox of Middleware: Innovation Enabler and Creativity Constraint
Miric, M., Ozalp, H., & Yilmaz, E. D. (2019) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3457 · Cited by 47
Identifying the patterns: Towards a systematic approach to digital platform regulation
Gleiss, A., Degen, K., & Pousttchi, K. (2022) · Journal of Information and Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962221146803 · Cited by 41
The implications of multi-sided platforms in managing digital business ecosystems
Suuronen, S., Ukko, J., Saunila, M., Rantala, T., & Rantanen, H. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114544 · Cited by 48
Market Definition and Market Power in Payment Card Networks
Emch, E. R., & Thompson, T. S. (2006) · Review of Network Economics · doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1088 · Cited by 40
Second-Degree Price Discrimination by a Two-Sided Monopoly Platform
Jeon, D., Kim, B., & Menicucci, D. (2022) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20190369 · Cited by 40
Choi, G., Nam, C., & Kim, S. (2018) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.04.003 · Cited by 40
Inoue, Y. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030726 · Cited by 41
Nicoli, M., & Paltrinieri, L. (2019) · South Atlantic Quarterly · doi:10.1215/00382876-7825624 · Cited by 40
Bosch, J., & Olsson, H. H. (2021) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2333 · Cited by 42
Fantastic Beasts: Blockchain Based Banking
Jayasuriya, D., & Sims, A. (2021) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm14040170 · Cited by 46
Platform Pricing at Sports Card Conventions
Jin, G. Z., & Rysman, M. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/joie.12088 · Cited by 41
Song, P., Zhang, C., Chen, W., & Huang, L. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2009.2023084 · Cited by 40
Data Sharing and Market Power with Two-Sided Platforms
Kirpalani, R., & Philippon, T. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28023 · Cited by 40
Price Discrimination, Two-Sided Markets, and Net Neutrality RegulationPreprint
Weisman, D. L., & Kulick, R. B. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1582972 · Cited by 40
Optimal Price/Advertising Menus for Two-Sided Media Platforms
DeValve, L., & Pekeč, S. (2022) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.2021.2230 · Cited by 39
Hybrid platform model: monopolistic competition and a dominant firm
Anderson, S. P., & Bedre-Defolie, Ö. (2024) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12478 · Cited by 39
Digital Battlegrounds: The Power Dynamics and Governance of Contemporary Platforms
Hunt, R. A., Townsend, D. M., Simpson, J., Nugent, R., Stallkamp, M., & Bozdag, E. (2024) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2022.0188 · Cited by 42
Competition Among Health Plans: A Two‐Sided Market Approach
Bardey, D., & Rochet, J.-C. M. (2010) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00257.x · Cited by 39
Self-citationUsing innovation contests to promote the development of generic technologies
Kokshagina, O., Gillier, T., Cogez, P., Masson, P. L., & Weil, B. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.035 · Cited by 39
Dou, G., Lin, X., & Xu, X. (2018) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-06-2017-0215 · Cited by 39
The Google search case in Europe: tying and the single monopoly profit theorem in two-sided markets
Iacobucci, E. M., & Ducci, F. (2018) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-018-9602-y · Cited by 39
Horizontal mergers between multisided platforms: Insights from Cournot competition
Correia‐da‐Silva, J., Jullien, B., Lefouili, Y., & Pinho, J. (2019) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/jems.12309 · Cited by 39
The market impacts of sharing economy entrants: evidence from USA and China
Guo, Y., Xin, F., & Li, X. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-018-09328-1 · Cited by 39
The Economics of Internet Media
Peitz, M., & Reisinger, M. (2015) · Handbook of media economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62721-6.00010-x · Cited by 39
The local bias in equity crowdfunding: Behavioral anomaly or rational preference?
Hornuf, L., Schmitt, M., & Stenzhorn, E. (2022) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/jems.12475 · Cited by 33
Winner does not take all: Selective attention and local bias in platform-based markets
Huotari, P., Järvi, K., Kortelainen, S., & Huhtamäki, J. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.028 · Cited by 39
Hagberg, J., & Kjellberg, H. (2020) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2020.1694209 · Cited by 39
Positive, Negative, and Amplified Network Externalities in Platform Markets
Karhu, K., Heiskala, M., Ritala, P., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2024) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2023.0119 · Cited by 41
Three layers of abstraction: a conceptual framework for theorizing digital multi-sided platforms
Poniatowski, M., Lüttenberg, H., Beverungen, D., & Kundisch, D. (2021) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-021-00513-8 · Cited by 43
Precommitments in Two-Sided Market Competition
Hu, M., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.1173 · Cited by 38
Decentralization in Organizations: A Revolution or a Mirage?
Reineke, P., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2025) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2022.0206 · Cited by 43
The economics and business models of prescription in the Internet
Benghozi, P., & Paris, T. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511493201.010 · Cited by 38
Mobile Payments Market: Towards Another Clash of the Titans?
Ondruš, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2011) · International Conference on Mobile Business · doi:10.1109/icmb.2011.41 · Cited by 38
FREE PARKING FOR ALL IN SHOPPING MALLS
Hasker, K., & Eren Inci, Z. (2014) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12090 · Cited by 38
Taxation in digital media markets
Kind, H. J., & Koethenbuerger, M. (2017) · Journal of Public Economic Theory · doi:10.1111/jpet.12257 · Cited by 38
Sponsoring Mobile Data: Analyzing the Impact on Internet Stakeholders
Joe‐Wong, C., Sen, S., & Ha, S. (2018) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2018.2826531 · Cited by 38
The determinants of network effects: Evidence from online games business ecosystems
Rong, K., Ren, Q., & Shi, X. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.007 · Cited by 38
A framework for sustainable service system configuration
van Riel, A. C. R., Zhang, J. J., McGinnis, L. P., Nejad, M. G., Bujisic, M., & Phillips, P. (2019) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-12-2018-0396 · Cited by 42
Price disclosure by two-sided platforms
Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. (2019) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2019.102529 · Cited by 38
Fagerjord, A., & Kueng, L. (2019) · Journal of Media Business Studies · doi:10.1080/16522354.2019.1684717 · Cited by 38
Optimal Growth in Two-Sided Markets
Lian, Z., & Ryzin, G. J. V. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3832 · Cited by 38
PLATFORM COMPETITION WITH ‘MUST‐HAVE’ COMPONENTS*
Hogendorn, C., & YUEN, S. K. Y. (2009) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00379.x · Cited by 38
Seeding growth at airports and airport cities: Insights from the two-sided market literature
Appold, S. J., & Kasarda, J. D. (2011) · Research in Transportation Business & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.06.011 · Cited by 38
From premium to freemium: The political economy of the app
Nieborg, D. B. (2015) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781501310591.ch-016 · Cited by 36
The success of art galleries: a dynamic model with competition and information effects
Prinz, A. L., Piening, J., & Ehrmann, T. (2014) · Journal of Cultural Economics · doi:10.1007/s10824-014-9217-2 · Cited by 37
Zhu, W., Xie, J., Xia, Y., Wei, L., & Liang, L. (2022) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.035 · Cited by 37
A typology of multi‐platform integration strategies
Schreieck, M., Ondruš, J., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2023) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12450 · Cited by 48
Algorithmic attention rents: A theory of digital platform market power
O’Reilly, T., Strauss, I., & Mazzucato, M. (2024) · Data & Policy · doi:10.1017/dap.2024.1 · Cited by 37
Keystone effect on entry into two-sided markets: An analysis of the market entry of WiMAX
Kang, J.-S., & Downing, S. T. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.008 · Cited by 37
Diversity in technology competition: The link between platforms and sociotechnical transitions
Papachristos, G. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.146 · Cited by 37
Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms
Furman, J. L., Gawer, A., Silverman, B. S., & Stern, S. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-3322201737 · Cited by 35
How is technological change affecting the nature of the corporation?
Birkinshaw, J. (2018) · Journal of the British Academy · doi:10.5871/jba/006s1.185 · Cited by 55
Diversification and performance in the mobile app market: The role of the platform ecosystem
Roma, P., & Vasi, M. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.003 · Cited by 37
Cybersecurity and platform competition in the cloud
Arce, D. G. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101774 · Cited by 37
The token’s secret: the two-faced financial incentive of the token economy
Drasch, B. J., Fridgen, G., Manner-Romberg, T., Nolting, F., & Radszuwill, S. (2020) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00412-9 · Cited by 37
King, S., Lusher, D., Hopkins, J., & Simpson, G. W. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122146 · Cited by 37
Does the room sharing business model disrupt housing markets? Empirical evidence of Airbnb in Taiwan
Chang, H. (2020) · Journal of Housing Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2020.101706 · Cited by 37
Attracting artists to music streaming platforms
Bender, M., Gal‐Or, E., & Geylani, T. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.049 · Cited by 37
Homing and platform responses to entry: Historical evidence from the U.S. newspaper industry
Park, K., Seamans, R., & Zhu, F. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3241 · Cited by 46
Pattern‐based development of digital platforms
Drewel, M., Özcan, L., Koldewey, C., & Gausemeier, J. (2020) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12415 · Cited by 37
Transforming the music industry: How platformization drives business ecosystem envelopment
Geurts, A., & Cepa, K. (2023) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102327 · Cited by 44
From supply chains towards manufacturing ecosystems: A system dynamics model
Kazantsev, N. S., Petrovskyi, O., & Müller, J. M. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122917 · Cited by 40
When Do Markets Tip? A Cognitive Hierarchy Approach
Hossain, T., & Morgan, J. (2013) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1120.0770 · Cited by 37
Optimal pricing and commitment in two-sided markets ∗
Hagiu, A. (2004) · Cited by 37
App Store, Marketplace, Play! An Analysis of Multi-Homing in Mobile Software EcosystemsPreprint
Hyrynsalmi, S., Mäkilä, T., Järvi, A., Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Knuutila, T. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.2540.5524 · Cited by 37
The Effect of Transaction Pricing on the Adoption of Electronic Payments: A Cross-Country Comparison
Bolt, W., Humphrey, D. B., & Uittenbogaard, R. (2005) · Working paper · doi:10.21799/frbp.wp.2005.28 · Cited by 37
Two-Sided Markets with Negative ExternalitiesPreprint
Reisinger, M. (2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.478 · Cited by 37
Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems
Nerbel, J. F., & Kreutzer, M. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00625-8 · Cited by 37
Dosis, A., & Sand‐Zantman, W. (2022) · The Journal of Law Economics and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/ewac001 · Cited by 36
Jiang, P., & Qin, S. (2024) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105092 · Cited by 41
On-demand ride-hailing platforms under green mobility: Pricing strategies and government regulation
Xu, Y. K., Ling, L., Wu, J., & Xu, S. (2024) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103650 · Cited by 36
Albano, G. L., Russo, F. A., Castaldi, G., & Zampino, R. (2015) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12190 · Cited by 36
Optimizing value creation and value capture with a digital multi‐sided business model
Gandia, R., & Parmentier, G. (2017) · Strategic Change · doi:10.1002/jsc.2134 · Cited by 36
La « plateformisation » de la formation
Bullich, V. (2018) · Distances et médiations des savoirs · doi:10.4000/dms.2096 · Cited by 36
Eferin, Y., Hohlov, Y. E., & Rossotto, C. M. (2019) · Digital Policy Regulation and Governance · doi:10.1108/dprg-11-2018-0065 · Cited by 36
Regulation strictness and supply in the platform economy: the case of Airbnb and Couchsurfing
Uzunca, B., & Borlenghi, A. (2019) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2019.1633278 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J.
- Affiliations
- Institut d'Économie Industrielle (FR)
- ORCID
- Rochet, Jean-Charles
- Venue
- Journal of the European Economic Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 990-1029
- ISSN
- 1542-4766 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-4774
- OpenAlex
- W1516051863
- Cited by
- 5,642
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 477 · 2025: 384 · 2024: 338 · 2023: 408 · 2022: 411 · 2021: 424 · 2020: 415 · 2019: 374 · 2018: 330 · 2017: 247 · 2016: 238 · 2015: 207 · 2014: 182 · 2013: 188 · 2012: 178
- FWCI
- 259.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.idref.fr
- Locations
- Journal of the European Economic Association (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole) (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- platform competition, two-sided markets, network effects, platform business models, platform governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
