Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,650

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unsupervised Learning

Barlow, H.B.·1989·Neural Computation

Abstract

What use can the brain make of the massive flow of sensory information that occurs without any associated rewards or punishments? This question is reviewed in the light of connectionist models of unsupervised learning and some older ideas, namely the cognitive maps and working models of Tolman and Craik, and the idea that redundancy is important for understanding perception (Attneave 1954), the physiology of sensory pathways (Barlow 1959), and pattern recognition (Watanabe 1960). It is argued that (1) The redundancy of sensory messages provides the knowledge incorporated in the maps or models. (2) Some of this knowledge can be obtained by observations of mean, variance, and covariance of sensory messages, and perhaps also by a method called “minimum entropy coding.” (3) Such knowledge may be incorporated in a model of “what usually happens” with which incoming messages are automatically compared, enabling unexpected discrepancies to be immediately identified. (4) Knowledge of the sort incorporated into such a filter is a necessary prerequisite of ordinary learning, and a representation whose elements are independent makes it possible to form associations with logical functions of the elements, not just with the elements themselves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.1989.1.3.295

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1037/h0054663 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0004-3702(84)90052-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1098/rspb.1981.0022 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1162/neco.1989.1.3.412 · DOI
  5. Barto A.G., 1983, IEEE Transact. Systems, Man, Cybernet. SMC-13(5), 835
  6. 10.1007/BF00337414 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF00342633 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1037/0033-295X.87.1.1 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7508 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/BF00319777 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/298266a0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/BF03380115 · DOI
  13. 10.1207/s15516709cog0901_5 · DOI
  14. 10.1098/rspb.1980.0051 · DOI
  15. 10.1098/rspb.1982.0038 · DOI
  16. Uttley A.M., 1970, J. Tkeoret. Biol., 27, 3147
  17. Uttley A.M., 1975, Tkeoret. Biol., 49, 355
  18. 10.1007/BF00288907 · DOI
  19. Watanabe S., 1960, I. B. M. I. Res. Dezt, 4, 208

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Barlow, H. B.
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
1989-09
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
295-311
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2912889105
Cited by
1,650
References
2
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.