Cited by 383Child Abuse and TraumaPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Antisocial personality disorder in abused and neglected children grown up

Barbara Luntz Weiler, Cathy Spatz Widom·1994·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: the authors' goal in this study was to examine the extent to which having been abused and/or neglected in childhood raises a person's risk for having an adult DSM-III-R diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder. METHOD: Children who had experienced substantiated child abuse and/or neglect from 1967 to 1971 in a Midwestern metropolitan county area were matched on the basis of age, race, sex, and approximate family social class with a group of nonabused and nonneglected children and followed prospectively into young adulthood. Subjects were located and participated in a 2-hour interview consisting of a series of structured and semistructured questions, rating scales, and a psychiatric assessment using the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Interviews were completed with 699 young adult subjects (416 abused and/or neglected and 283 comparison subjects). RESULTS: Childhood victimization was a significant predictor of the number of lifetime symptoms of antisocial personality disorder and of a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder, despite the fact that controls for demographic characteristics and arrest history were introduced. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the importance of inquiring about a patient's childhood history of abuse and/or neglect when antisocial symptoms are evident. In addition to speculation about a possible saturation model for the consequences of childhood victimization, these findings also reinforce a multiple causation model of antisocial personality disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.151.5.670

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a unique association between childhood physical abuse (CPA) and antisocial (AS) traits in adulthood.

    “Both cross-sectional and longitudinal research suggest that there is a unique association between childhood physical abuse (CPA) and antisocial (AS) traits in adulthood (Lobbestael et al., 2010; Luntz & Widom, 1994).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiler, B. L., & Widom, C. S.
Affiliations
University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1994-05-01
Volume
151
Issue
5
Pages
670-674
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W1875671833
Cited by
383
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (SO7 RR0731)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
antisocial personality disorder, child abuse, child neglect, child victimization, young adults, saturation model, arrest history, DSM-III-R diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Probability, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Causality, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review