Cited by 1,123Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion Modulation in PTSD: Clinical and Neurobiological Evidence for a Dissociative Subtype

Open access

Abstract

In this article, the authors present evidence regarding a dissociative subtype of PTSD, with clinical and neurobiological features that can be distinguished from nondissociative PTSD. The dissociative subtype is characterized by overmodulation of affect, while the more common undermodulated type involves the predominance of reexperiencing and hyperarousal symptoms. This article focuses on the neural manifestations of the dissociative subtype in PTSD and compares it to those underlying the reexperiencing/hyperaroused subtype. A model that includes these two types of emotion dysregulation in PTSD is described. In this model, reexperiencing/hyperarousal reactivity is viewed as a form of emotion dysregulation that involves emotional undermodulation, mediated by failure of prefrontal inhibition of limbic regions. In contrast, the dissociative subtype of PTSD is described as a form of emotion dysregulation that involves emotional overmodulation mediated by midline prefrontal inhibition of the same limbic regions. Both types of modulation are involved in a dynamic interplay and lead to alternating symptom profiles in PTSD. These findings have important implications for treatment of PTSD, including the need to assess patients with PTSD for dissociative symptoms and to incorporate the treatment of dissociative symptoms into stage-oriented trauma treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081168

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1176/ajp.158.8.1239b · DOI
  2. Keane TM, 2008, J Rehabil Res Dev, 45, vii
  3. Ludaescher P, J Psych Neurosci
  4. 10.1176/ajp.153.1.83 · DOI
  5. Krystal JH , Bennett A , Bremner JD , Southwick SM , Charney DS : Toward a cognitive neuroscience of dissociation and altered memory functions in post-traumatic stress disorder, in Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Stress: From Normal Adaptation to PTSD. Edited by , Friedman MJ , Charney DS , Deutch AY . Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1995, pp 239–269
  6. Herman JL : Sequelae of prolonged and repeated trauma: evidence for a complex posttraumatic syndrome (DESNOS), in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: DSM-IV and Beyond. Edited by , Davidson JRT , Foa EB . Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1993, pp 213–228
  7. Kleindienst N, J Pers Disord
  8. Ebner-Priemer UW, 2009, J Psychiatry Neurosci, 34, 214

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Lanius, R. A., Vermetten, E., Loewenstein, R. J., Brand, B., Schmahl, C., Bremner, J. D., & Spiegel, D.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
167
Issue
6
Pages
640-647
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2124556602
Cited by
1,123
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 74
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG018784)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL088726)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH080208, R01MH056120, R01MH047226, K24MH076955, T32MH067547, R01MH060556)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA118567, R01CA061309, U01CA197282)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR016917)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (RC1AT005733, P30AT005886)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, emotional dysregulation, re-experiencing, hyperarousal, limbic regions, dissociation, trauma treatment, symptom profiles
MeSH terms
Affect, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Chronic Disease, Dissociative Disorders, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory Disorders, Neural Inhibition, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review