The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity
Abstract
Although consumers often encounter ads for familiar brands, previous advertising interference studies have used ads for low-familiarity brands. The authors focus on brand familiarity's role in increasing ad memorability and moderating competitive interference. They conducted a factorial experiment varying the familiarity of brands featured in test and competing ads. With differences in ad executions, prior exposure, processing objectives, and exposure time experimentally controlled, subjects displayed substantially better recall of new product information for familiar brands. Their findings suggest that established brands have important advantages in advertising: Consumers should be more likely to recall ad information, and their memory should be less affected by exposure to competitors’ ads. The authors conclude with implications for the marketing of new and mature brands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Abraham Magid M., 1990, Harvard Business Review, 50
- 10.1086/209080 · DOI · Paper page
- Alba Joseph W., 1991, Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 1
- Assael Henry, 1993, Journal of Advertising Research, 33, 49, 10.1080/00218499.1993.12466893 · doi:10.1080/00218499.1993.12466893
- Baker William, 1993, Advertising Exposure, Memory and Choice, 49
- 10.1177/002224297904300205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208883 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/209145 · DOI · Paper page
- Ephron Erwin, 1992, Inside Media, 45
- Ephron Erwin, 1994, Inside Media, 38
- Fahey Alison, 1992, Advertising Age
- 10.1037/h0024714 · doi:10.1037/h0024714
- Garfield Bob, 1992, Advertising Age, 53
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb22851.x · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb22851.x
- Hutchinson Wesley, 1986, Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 450
- Jones John Phillip, 1990, Harvard Business Review, 38
- Kardes Frank R., 1994, Handbook of Social Cognition, 2
- 10.1086/209116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208571 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224299305700101 · DOI · Paper page
- Keller Kevin Lane, 1993, Advertising Exposure, Memory and Choice, 11
- Kent Robert J., 1993, Journal of Advertising Research, 33, 40, 10.1080/00218499.1993.12466880 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00994075 · DOI
- Lipman Joanne, 1990, The Wall Street Journal, B1
- 10.1086/208893 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224299305700406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224299105500403 · DOI · Paper page
- Mandese Joe, 1991, Advertising Age, 6
- Mandese Joe, 1992, Advertising Age, 49
- 10.1086/208951 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208563 · DOI · Paper page
- Ostrom Thomas M., 1980, Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium an Personality and Social Psychology, 3
- Peter J. Paul, 1987, Consumer Behavior: Marketing Strategy Perspectives.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.628 · DOI
- Schroer James C., 1990, Harvard Business Review, 44
- 10.1177/002224378802500107 · DOI
- Smith Daniel C., 1992, Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 11, 10.1080/00218499.1992.12466857 · DOI
- 10.1080/00913367.1991.10673343 · DOI
- Srull Thomas K., 1983, Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 572
- Srull Thomas K., 1992, Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 23
- 10.1080/00913367.1992.10673372 · DOI
- 10.1080/01633392.1985.10505383 · DOI
- Wallace Wanda T., 1992, “Judgments of Frequency of Occurrence: Implications for Processing of Advertising Messages,”
- 10.1086/209318 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Yim, M. Y.-C., Chu, S.-C., & Sauer, P. L. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001 · Cited by 1,142
Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects
Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376800 · Cited by 853
Exciting red and competent blue: the importance of color in marketing
Labrecque, L. I., & Milne, G. R. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0245-y · Cited by 733
The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis
Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0503-8 · Cited by 601
The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall
Keller, K. L., Heckler, S. E., & Houston, M. J. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200105 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 97-105
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2021540993
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224299405800307
- The paper
- Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.