Cited by 171Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesScience Education and Pedagogy

Quizzing in Middle‐School Science: Successful Transfer Performance on Classroom Exams

McDaniel, Mark A., Thomas, Ruthann C., Agarwal, Pooja K., McDermott, Kathleen B., Roediger, Henry L.·2013·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Summary: We examined whether learning from quizzing arises from memorization of answers or fosters more complete understanding of the quizzed content. In middle‐school science classes, we spaced three multiple‐choice quizzes on content in a unit. In Experiment 1, the class exams included questions given on quizzes, transfer questions targeting the same content, and content that had not been quizzed (control content). The quizzing procedure was associated with significant learning benefits with large effect sizes and similar effect sizes for both transfer items and identical items. In Experiment 2, quiz questions focused on definitional information or application of the principle. Application questions increased exam performance for definitional‐type questions and for different application questions. Definition questions did not confer benefits for application questions. Test‐enhanced learning, in addition to other factors in the present quizzing protocol (repeated, spaced presentation of the content), may create deeper understanding that leads to certain types of transfer. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.2914

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Core classroom content can be better remembered on unit exams after low-stakes multiple-choice quizzing with immediate correct-answer feedback.

    “In other studies, we have also repeatedly demonstrated that core classroom content can be better remembered on unit exams after lowstakes multiple-choice quizzing with immediate correct-answer feedback (McDaniel et al. 2007(McDaniel et al. , 2011(McDaniel et al. , 2013;;Roediger et al. 2011a).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as McDaniel et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R. C., Agarwal, P. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis MO USA
Corresponding author
McDaniel, Mark A.
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-25
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
360-372
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W2106271848
Cited by
171
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Washington University in St. Louis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
quizzing, retrieval practice, spaced repetition, transfer of learning, junior high school science, multiple-choice quizzes, exam performance, memorization versus understanding, application questions, classroom assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review