Cited by 223Diabetes Management and EducationProblem Solving Skills DevelopmentCancer survivorship and care

Healthy Coping, Negative Emotions, and Diabetes Management

Fisher, Edwin B., Thorpe, Carolyn T., McEvoy DeVellis, Brenda, DeVellis, Robert F.·2007·The Diabetes Educator

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the literature pertinent to healthy coping in diabetes management and to identify effective or promising interventions and areas needing further investigation. Methods A PubMed search identified 186 articles in English published between January 1, 1990, and July 31, 2006, addressing diabetes and emotion, quality of life, depression, adjustment, anxiety, coping, family therapy, behavior therapy, psychotherapy, problem solving, couples therapy, or marital therapy. Results Connections among psychological variables, behavioral factors, coping, metabolic control, and quality of life are appreciable and multidirectional. Interventions for which well-controlled studies indicate benefits for quality of life and/or metabolic control include general self-management, coping/problem-solving interventions, stress management, support groups, cognitive-behavioral therapy, behavioral family systems therapy, cognitive-analytic therapy, multisystemic therapy, medications for depression, and the Pathways intervention integrating case management, support of medication, and problem-solving counseling. Conclusions Psychological, emotional, related behavioral factors, and quality of life are important in diabetes management, are worthy of attention in their own right, and influence metabolic control. A range of interventions that achieve benefits in these areas provide a base for developing versatile programs to promote healthy coping.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145721707309808

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, E. B., Thorpe, C. T., McEvoy DeVellis, B., & DeVellis, R. F.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Durham VA Health Care System (US)
  • Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Venue
The Diabetes Educator
Published
2007-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1080-1103
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6063
OpenAlex
W2139055996
Cited by
223
References
175
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
diabetes management, negative emotions, quality of life, depression, anxiety, stress management, coping interventions, problem-solving intervention, family therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, metabolic control, support groups, diabetes self-management
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Diabetes Mellitus, Emotions, Health Status, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review