Cited by 584Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self

Cohen, Geoffrey L., Aronson, Joshua, Steele, Claude M.·2000·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

People often cling to beliefs even in the face of disconfirming evidence and interpret ambiguous information in a manner that bolsters strongly held attitudes. The authors tested a motivational account suggesting that these defensive reactions would be ameliorated by an affirmation of an alternative source of self-worth. Consistent with this interpretation, participants were more persuaded by evidence impugning their views toward capital punishment when they were self-affirmed than when they were not (Studies 1 and 2). Affirmed participants also proved more critical of an advocate whose arguments confirmed their views on abortion and less confident in their own attitudes regarding that issue than did unaffirmed participants (Study 3). Results suggest that assimilation bias and resistance to persuasion are mediated, in part, by identity-maintenance motivations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672002611011

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bastardi, N., 2000, Maintaining self-integrity: Effects of threat to personal identity on evidence evaluation and concession making
  2. Bless, H., 1990, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 99, 229
  3. Gilovich, T., 1991, How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reasoning in everyday life
  4. Harber, K., 1995, Sources of Validation Scale
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.26 · DOI
  6. Ross, L., 1980, New directions for methodology of behavioral science: Fallible judgment in behavioral research
  7. Ross, L., 1995, Values and knowledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 580

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Geoffrey L.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2000-11
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1151-1164
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2041949427
Cited by
584
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 34
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
self-affirmation, resistance to persuasion, identity preservation, motivated reasoning, belief updating, disconfirming evidence, abortion attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review