Cited by 226Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychology of Social Influence

An affirmed self and an open mind: Self‐affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength

Correll, Joshua, Spencer, Steven J, Zanna, Mark P·2004·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.001

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correll, Spencer, and Zanna (2004) found that self-affirmation led people to be more responsive to the intrinsic strength of arguments rather than the concordance of those arguments with their prior beliefs.

    “This is what Correll et al. (2004) found.Self-aYrmation led people to be more responsive to the intrinsic strength of the arguments rather than the concordance of those arguments with their prior beliefs.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Correll et al. (2004)

  • It was only these participants for whom affirmation proved an effective debiasing intervention.

    “Further, it was only these participants for whom aYrmation proved an eVective debiasing intervention.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Correll et al., 2004

  • Only participants who saw tuition increases as personally important were biased in their assessments of the quality of pro- versus counterattitudinal information on the topic.

    “They found that only participants who saw tuition increases as personally important were biased in their assessments of the quality of pro-versus counterattitudinal information on this topic.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Correll et al., 2004

  • Self-affirmation makes people more responsive to the strength of persuasive arguments.

    “The finding that self-aYrmation makes people more responsive to the strength of persuasive arguments (Correll et al., 2004)”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Correll et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Correll, J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Correll, Joshua
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
350-356
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075860471
Cited by
225
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 6
FWCI
20.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
self-affirmation, argument strength, persuasion, attitude change, attitude importance, defensive reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review