Cited by 174Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mortality Salience Increases Adherence to Salient Norms and Values

Abstract

Four studies indicate that mortality salience increases adherence to social norms and values, but only when cultural norms and values are salient. In Study 1, mortality salience coupled with a reminder about cultural values of egalitarianism reduced prejudice toward Blacks among non-Black participants. In Studies 2 through 4, a mortality salience induction (e.g., walking through a cemetery) increased self-reported and actual helping behavior only when the cultural value of helping was salient. These results suggest that people may adhere to norms and values so as to manage awareness of death.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167208316791

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aries, P., 1981, The hour of our death
  2. Becker, E., 1973, The denial of death
  3. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.35 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Gailliot, M. T., Stillman, T. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Maner, J. K., & Plant, E. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Gailliot, Matthew T.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2008-05-09
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
993-1003
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2072773461
Cited by
174
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
mortality salience, social norms, cultural values, egalitarianism, helping behavior, death awareness
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Death, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Individuality, Male, Motivation, Prejudice, Social Behavior, Social Conformity, Social Identification, Social Values, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review