Cited by 298Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEmotions and Moral BehaviorPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: Core processes from gene to meme

Keltner, Dacher, Kogan, Aleksandr, Piff, Paul K., Saturn, Sarina R.·2014·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

The study of prosocial behavior--altruism, cooperation, trust, and the related moral emotions--has matured enough to produce general scholarly consensus that prosociality is widespread, intuitive, and rooted deeply within our biological makeup. Several evolutionary frameworks model the conditions under which prosocial behavior is evolutionarily viable, yet no unifying treatment exists of the psychological decision-making processes that result in prosociality. Here, we provide such a perspective in the form of the sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality. We review evidence for the components of our framework at four levels of analysis: intrapsychic, dyadic, group, and cultural. Within these levels, we consider how phenomena such as altruistic punishment, prosocial contagion, self-other similarity, and numerous others give rise to prosocial behavior. We then extend our reasoning to chart the biological underpinnings of prosociality and apply our framework to understand the role of social class in prosociality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115054

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depending upon personal history, including attachment style, exogenous oxytocin can increase antisocial behaviors such as gloating, envy, out-group hostility, and ethnocentrism.

    “Depending upon personal history, including attachment style, it can increase antisocial behaviors such as gloating, envy, out-group hostility and ethnocentrism (Keltner et al., 2014).”

    From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Keltner et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keltner, D., Kogan, A., Piff, P. K., & Saturn, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2014-01-03
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
425-460
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2134484395
Cited by
298
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 6
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
prosocial behavior, altruism, cooperation, trust, moral emotions, altruistic punishment, self-other similarity, evolutionary psychology, social class, cultural evolution, ethical decision-making
MeSH terms
Altruism, Cooperative Behavior, Emotions, Empathy, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Morals, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review