The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data
Abstract
A taxonomy of covariance structure models for rep resenting multitrait-multimethod data is presented. Us ing this taxonomy, it is possible to formulate alternate series of hierarchically ordered, or nested, models for such data. By specifying hierarchically nested models, significance tests of differences between competing models are available. Within the proposed framework, specific model comparisons may be formulated to test the significance of the convergent and the discriminant validity shown by a set of measures as well as the ex tent of method variance. Application of the proposed framework to three multitrait-multimethod matrices al lowed resolution of contradictory conclusions drawn in previously published work, demonstrating the utility of the present approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291393 · Cited by 1,481
Cited by
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · Cited by 15,744
Assessing construct validity in organizational research
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393203 · Cited by 6,621
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 · Cited by 5,628
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Self-citationCole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558 · Cited by 3,605
The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach
Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001 · Cited by 3,310
On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 · Cited by 2,441
The use of lisrel in validating marketing constructs
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (1991) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(91)90027-5 · Cited by 1,848
Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109332834 · Cited by 1,721
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462 · Cited by 1,616
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693 · Cited by 1,480
Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814002 · Cited by 1,380
A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research
Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819800100104 · Cited by 1,217
Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.174 · Cited by 1,113
The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004 · Cited by 813
Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, Validity, and Reliability
Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17249495 · Cited by 759
Two-dimensional self-esteem: Theory and measurement
Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B. (2001) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00169-0 · Cited by 606
Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework.
Netemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.148 · Cited by 492
The Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests
Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.008 · Cited by 486
SERV*OR: A managerial measure of organizational service orientation
Lytle, R. S., Hom, P. W., & Mokwa, M. P. (1998) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(99)80104-3 · Cited by 402
Curry, O. S., Jones Chesters, M., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008 · Cited by 235
Emergence of attributional style and its relation to depressive symptoms.
Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., Dallaire, D. H., Jacquez, F. M., Pineda, A. Q., LaGrange, B., Truss, A. E., Folmer, A. S., Tilghman-Osborne, C., & Felton, J. W. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.117.1.16 · Cited by 192
Han, S., Min, J., & Lee, H. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.004 · Cited by 183
A Panel Study of Coping with Involuntary Job Loss
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., & Mckee-Ryan, F. M. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556388 · Cited by 153
Measurement Errors in the Behavioral Sciences: The Case of Personality/Attitude Research
Buckley, M. R., Cote, J. A., & Comstock, S. M. (1990) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164490503001 · Cited by 147
The role of outsourcing management process in improving the effectiveness of logistics outsourcing
Zhu, W., Ng, S. C. H., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.004 · Cited by 110
Psychometric Evaluation of Lexical Diversity Indices: Assessing Length Effects
Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & Green, S. B. (2015) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-14-0280 · Cited by 93
Geiser, C., Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Courvoisier, D. S., & Cole, D. A. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017888 · Cited by 92
Multitrait–multimethod matrices in consumer research: Critique and new developments
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1057-7408(08)80022-8 · Cited by 61
Construct Mixology: Forming New Management Constructs by Combining Old Ones
Newman, D. A., Harrison, D. A., Carpenter, N. C., & Rariden, S. M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1161965 · Cited by 60
Harris, M. M., & Bladen, A. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000409 · Cited by 33
The Effects of Method Variance Within Measures
Tepper, B. J., & Tepper, K. (1993) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1993.9915563 · Cited by 30
Test of a latent structure of performance ratings derived from Wherry's (1952) theory of rating
Lance, C. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90029-9 · Cited by 25
Chu, C., Russell, M. T., Hoff, K. A., Jonathan Phan, W. M., & Rounds, J. (2022) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/10690727221081554 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Widaman, K. F.
- Venue
- Applied Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0146-6216 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3497
- OpenAlex
- W2017897883
- Cited by
- 1,037
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
