The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future
Abstract
The authors review team research that has been conducted over the past 10 years. They discuss the nature of work teams in context and note the substantive differences underlying different types of teams. They then review representative studies that have appeared in the past decade in the context of an enhanced input-process-outcome framework that has evolved into an inputs-mediators-outcome time-sensitive approach. They note what has been learned along the way and identify fruitful directions for future research. They close with a reconsideration of the typical team research investigation and call for scholars to embrace the complexity that surrounds modern team-based organizational designs as we move forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Self-citationWhat Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · Cited by 3,413
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071 · cited 1×
“In a meta-analysis De Dreu and Weingart (2003) found that both relationship and task conflict have strong, negative correlations with team performance and member satisfaction.”
BackgroundPredicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207 · Cited by 3,026
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF CONFLICT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF INTRAGROUP CONFLICT AND GROUP PERFORMANCE.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069453 · Cited by 2,487
Cited by
S., N. L. (2017) · doi:10.1177/1609406917733847 · Cited by 14,051
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601111401017 · Cited by 1,315
Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309347376 · Cited by 1,141
Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314559946 · Cited by 825
Self-citationA century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000128 · Cited by 593
Self-citationBradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024200 · Cited by 454
A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models: Moving Toward a Dynamic and Temporal Framework
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313503014 · Cited by 408
Self-citationGroup Faultlines: A Review, Integration, and Guide to Future Research
Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311426187 · Cited by 391
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000113 · Cited by 375
Virtual teams in organizations.
Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004 · Cited by 342
Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005 · Cited by 329
Mathieu, J. E., Kukenberger, M. R., D'Innocenzo, L., & Reilly, G. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038898 · Cited by 316
Self-citationLeadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective
Liao, C. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010 · Cited by 305
Zajac, S., Woods, A., Tannenbaum, S., Salas, E., & Holladay, C. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.606445 · Cited by 235
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
Self-citationWriting Nonempirical Articles for Journal of Management: General Thoughts and Suggestions
Cropanzano, R. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309344118 · Cited by 176
Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091240 · Cited by 163
Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: A review
Gabelica, C., Bossche, P. V. D., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.003 · Cited by 146
Conceptualizing Emergent States: A Strategy to Advance the Study of Group Dynamics
Waller, M. J., Okhuysen, G. A., & Saghafian, M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1120958 · Cited by 143
The Role of Shared Mental Model Development in Understanding Virtual Team Effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601113475361 · Cited by 143
Self-citationGrossman, R., Nolan, K., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2022) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866211041157 · Cited by 133
Theory‐Driven Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business and Management
Brown, O., Davison, R. M., Decker, S., Ellis, D. A., Faulconbridge, J., Gore, J., Greenwood, M., Islam, G., Lubinski, C., MacKenzie, N. G., et al. (2024) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12788 · Cited by 128
Team Dispersion and Performance: The Role of Team Communication and Transformational Leadership
Eisenberg, J., Post, C., & DiTomaso, N. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419827376 · Cited by 108
Teams in Space Exploration: A New Frontier for the Science of Team Effectiveness
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Miller, C. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Vessey, W. B. (2015) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414566448 · Cited by 92
Self-citationInteractive Effects of Team Virtuality and Work Design on Team Functioning
Handke, L., Klonek, F. E., Parker, S. K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419863490 · Cited by 88
“Accordingly, task interdependence is essentially what distinguishes a group from a real team (cf. Mathieu et al., 2008) and constitutes a prerequisite for team processes and states to emerge and evolve (Marks et al., 2001).”
BackgroundA longitudinal examination of the relationship between team leadership and performance
Gupta, V. K., Huang, R., & Niranjan, S. (2010) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051809359184 · Cited by 82
Rethinking Virtuality and Its Impact on Teams
Foster, M. K., Abbey, A., Callow, M. A., Zu, X., & Wilbon, A. D. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496415573795 · Cited by 71
Autonomous work groups and the challenge of inter-group coordination
Ingvaldsen, J. A., & Rolfsen, M. (2012) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726712448203 · Cited by 66
How virtual team leaders cope with creativity challenges
Han, S. J., Chae, C., Macko, P., Park, W., & Beyerlein, M. (2017) · European Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-10-2016-0073 · Cited by 55
When does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as contingency factors
Schaubroeck, J. M., & Yu, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.009 · Cited by 55
Addressing Virtual Work Challenges: Learning From the Field
Eisenberg, J., & Krishnan, A. (2018) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1080/15416518.2018.1471976 · Cited by 54
Liu, X., & Liu, J. (2013) · Nankai Business Review International · doi:10.1108/nbri-07-2013-0023 · Cited by 48
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., & Zornoza, A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12449 · Cited by 47
Han, J. H., Liao, H., Han, J., & Li, A. N. (2021) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12415 · Cited by 40
McGuier, E. A., Kolko, D. J., Stadnick, N. A., Brookman-Frazee, L., Wolk, C. B., Yuan, C. T., Burke, C. S., & Aarons, G. A. (2023) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/26334895231190855 · Cited by 34
Criteria Issues and Team Effectiveness
Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0027 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-03-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 410-476
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2115534757
- Cited by
- 2,391
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 98.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
