Cited by 155Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential effects of MDMA and methylphenidate on social cognition

Open access

Abstract

Social cognition is important in everyday-life social interactions. The social cognitive effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy') and methylphenidate (both used for neuroenhancement and as party drugs) are largely unknown. We investigated the acute effects of MDMA (75 mg), methylphenidate (40 mg) and placebo using the Facial Emotion Recognition Task, Multifaceted Empathy Test, Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition, Social Value Orientation Test and the Moral Judgment Task in a cross-over study in 30 healthy subjects. Additionally, subjective, autonomic, pharmacokinetic, endocrine and adverse drug effects were measured. MDMA enhanced emotional empathy for positive emotionally charged situations in the MET and tended to reduce the recognition of sad faces in the Facial Emotion Recognition Task. MDMA had no effects on cognitive empathy in the Multifaceted Empathy Test or social cognitive inferences in the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition. MDMA produced subjective 'empathogenic' effects, such as drug liking, closeness to others, openness and trust. In contrast, methylphenidate lacked such subjective effects and did not alter emotional processing, empathy or mental perspective-taking. MDMA but not methylphenidate increased the plasma levels of oxytocin and prolactin. None of the drugs influenced moral judgment. Effects on emotion recognition and emotional empathy were evident at a low dose of MDMA and likely contribute to the popularity of the drug.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881114542454

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hysek CM, 2013, Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci
  2. Janke W, 1978, Die Eigenschaftswörterliste
  3. Zerssen DV, 1976, Die Beschwerden-Liste. Münchener Informationssystem

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 155

Metadata

Authors
Schmid, Y., Hysek, C. M., Simmler, L. D., Crockett, M. J., Quednow, B. B., & Liechti, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Liechti, Matthias E
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2014-07-22
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
847-856
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2073612520
Cited by
155
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
FWCI
18.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
MDMA, ecstasy, methylphenidate, social cognition, affective empathy, cognitive empathy, facial emotion recognition, social value orientation, moral judgment, oxytocin, prolactin, subjective effects, acute drug effects, cognitive enhancement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Cognition, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Empathy, Epinephrine, Facial Expression, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Judgment, Male, Methylphenidate, Oxytocin, Prolactin, Cross-Over Studies, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review