Cited by 951Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the multifaceted empathy test (MET).

Dziobek, Isabel, Rogers, Kimberley, Fleck, Stefan, Bahnemann, Markus, Heekeren, Hauke R., Wolf, Oliver T., Convit, Antonio·2008·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Empathy is a multidimensional construct consisting of cognitive (inferring mental states) and emotional (empathic concern) components. Despite a paucity of research, individuals on the autism spectrum are generally believed to lack empathy. In the current study we used a new, photo-based measure, the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET), to assess empathy multidimensionally in a group of 17 individuals with Asperger syndrome (AS) and 18 well-matched controls. Results suggested that while individuals with AS are impaired in cognitive empathy, they do not differ from controls in emotional empathy. Level of general emotional arousability and socially desirable answer tendencies did not differ between groups. Internal consistency of the MET's scales ranged from .71 to .92, and convergent and divergent validity were highly satisfactory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Dziobek, Isabel
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2007-11-08
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
464-473
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2088779903
Cited by
951
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, theory of mind, empathic concern, social desirability bias
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Cognition Disorders, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Asperger Syndrome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review