Cited by 484Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Parent and peer attachment in late childhood and early adolescence

Nickerson, Amanda B., Nagle, Richard J.·2005·The Journal of Early Adolescence

Abstract

This study investigated child and early adolescent relationships with parents and peers within the theoretical framework of attachment. A cross-sectional sample of 279 fourth, sixth, and eighth graders completed two self-report measures assessing attachment to parents and friends. Fourth graders described more trusting and communicative relationships with parents than sixth or eighth graders. Older early adolescents turned to peers to fulfill attachment functions of proximity seeking and safe haven more often than children, although all participants reported that parents primarily served secure base functions. Females reported more trust, communication, and overall attachment to peers than males. Grade, sex, and views of attachment relationships to parents and peers predicted the introduction of friends into the attachment hierarchy. Participants who viewed relationships with parents as less secure were more likely to select peers to fulfill attachment functions. The important and complementary roles of parents and peers and their implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272431604274174

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents often have stronger ties to peers than younger children do.

    “Across cultures, adolescents often have stronger ties to peers than younger children do (Nickerson, 2005).”
  • The equal status of individuals and their peers allows them to share and understand feelings for each other to meet their needs, thus maintaining and promoting peer relationships. This may further enhance peer secure attachment.

    “The equal status of individuals and their peers allows them to share and understand feelings for each other to meet their needs, thus maintaining and promoting peer relationships. This may further enhance peer secure attachment [33,34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Nickerson, Amanda B.
Venue
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Published
2005-05
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
223-249
ISSN
  • 0272-4316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5449
OpenAlex
W2155199147
Cited by
484
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Early Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
parental attachment, peer attachment, attachment theory, secure base, safe haven, proximity seeking, trust, parent-child relationship, peer relationships, early adolescence, late childhood, gender differences, attachment security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review