The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Abstract
Americans' attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals' and conservatives' environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [277]
Citations
Cites
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574
Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/714000580 · Cited by 432
Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x · Cited by 155
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Bazerman M. H., 1999, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 39
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00826.x · DOI
- Boote A. S., 1981, Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 29
- 10.1177/1368430208098783 · DOI
- 10.1080/10463280240000082 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797610391911 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01523.x · DOI
- 10.1162/0011526042365555 · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026611404336 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00132.x · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017423 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013916596281006 · DOI
- Lakoff G., 1996, Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t
- 10.1017/S0022381608080742 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00475.x · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01204.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022198294003 · DOI
- 10.2307/1598934 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · DOI · Paper page
- Stern P. C., 1999, Human Ecology Review, 6, 81
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00775.x · DOI
- Wardekker A., 2008, Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations, and perceptions, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 777
Sachdeva, S. S., & Zhao, J. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1819 · Cited by 36
All Things Being Equal: Distinguishing Proportionality and Equity in Moral Reasoning
Skurka, C., Winett, L. B., Jarman-Miller, H., & Niederdeppe, J. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619862261 · Cited by 38
Lackner, S., Francisco, F., Mendonça, C., Mata, A., & Gonçalves-Sá, J. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01677-8 · Cited by 46
“Thus, it is important to share accurate information, while also conveying humility, both on the scientists’ and the lay public's side, and without colliding with individuals' values and ideology [46-49].”
BackgroundHahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.015 · Cited by 32
Ramos, G., Johnson, W. A., VanEpps, E. M., & Graham, J. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1427 · Cited by 40
Matz, S., Beck, E. D., Atherton, O. E., White, M. J. D., Rauthmann, J. F., Mroczek, D. K., Kim, M.-H., & Bogg, T. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231191774 · Cited by 45
“This is true across a wide range of political issues, including military spending, same-sex marriage, environmental protection, and universal health care (Feinberg & Willer, 2013, 2015, 2019; Voelkel & Feinberg, 2018).”
What Makes Diets Political? Moral Foundations and the Left-Wing-Vegan Connection
Grünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2021) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-020-00361-w · Cited by 42
Tourists’ water conservation behavior in hotels: the role of gender
Casado‐Díaz, A. B., Esper, F. S., Rodríguez-Sánchez, C., & Rubio, R. S. (2020) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2020.1839758 · Cited by 36
Doran, R., Böhm, G., Pfister, H., Steentjes, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2019) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1473468 · Cited by 31
“…especially U.S. studies have found a strong partisan divide in the endorsement of different moral foundations; framing messages so that they match individually held moral principles can then be one approach to overcome ideological polarizations on environmental issues (Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
BackgroundArpan, L. M., Xu, X., Raney, A. A., Chen, C., & Wang, Z. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.007 · Cited by 40
Guo, D., Cao, Z., DeFrancia, K., Yeo, J. W. G., Hardadi, G., & Chai, S. (2018) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.1734 · Cited by 31
Sociopolitical ideology and the morality of green behaviour
Currie, S., & Choma, B. L. (2017) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1413727 · Cited by 35
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) focused on perceiving the single behaviour of recycling as moral (Study 1) and the perception of the morality of behaving pro-environmentally generally (i.e. without indicating any specific behaviours; Study 2).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBeyond Aesthetic Judgment: Beauty Increases Moral Standing Through Perceptions of Purity
Klebl, C., Luo, Y., & Bastian, B. B. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211023648 · Cited by 28
“Similarly, framing pro-environmental rhetoric in terms of purity increases pro-environmental attitudes in conservatives (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundSong, Y.-Y., Huang, Z., Schuldt, J. P., & Yuan, Y. (2021) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884921989124 · Cited by 30
“Content analyses of newspapers (Feinberg and Willer, 2013) find that harm and care are the two major moral themes stressed in contemporary US environmental discourse, and that they resonate more with liberals than with conservatives.”
BackgroundWynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218305 · Cited by 51
I May Not Agree With You, but I Trust You: Caring About Social Issues Signals Integrity
Zlatev, J. J. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619837948 · Cited by 39
Brügger, A., & Höchli, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01018 · Cited by 30
“There is evidence that people understand behaviors that affect the environment to be morally relevant (Stern, 2000; Feinberg and Willer, 2013; Van der Werff et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2017), but the extent to which the same applies to caring for one’s own health is less clear.”
BackgroundAssessing the contextual stability of moral foundations: Evidence from a survey experiment
Ciuk, D. J. (2018) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168018781748 · Cited by 34
“, 2014), and attitudes on highly polarized issues including stem-cell research (Clifford and Jerit, 2013), the environment (Feinberg and Willer, 2013), and various “culture war” issues (Koleva et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialBreaking down biocentrism: two distinct forms of moral concern for nature
Rottman, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00905 · Cited by 30
“…framing environmental messages in terms of upholding the purity of the environment increases the www.frontiersin.org August 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 905 | 1 pro-environmental attitudes of political conservatives, while harm-based framings do not exert any effect (Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundiCoRe: The GDELT Interface for the Advancement of Communication ResearchPreprint
Hopp, F. R., Schaffer, J., Fisher, J., & Weber, R. (2019) · Computational Communication Research · doi:10.31235/osf.io/smjwb · Cited by 29
“This finding is unexpected, since results by Feinberg and Willer (2013; 2015) suggest that newspaper outlets would be more successful in communicating issues of climate change towards their audiences when considering the underlying moral cognitive structures of message receivers.”
BackgroundResultBuana, Y., Hidayat, D., Prayogi, B., & Vendy, V. (2017) · Binus Business Review · doi:10.21512/bbr.v8i1.1958 · Cited by 38
“There is also a tendency that the attitude is shown as an effort to make the individual as a role model and example (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundExplaining Away Differences in Moral Judgment
Graham, J. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615592242 · Cited by 41
“…2015), moderate domain-general effects such as omission/commission and means/byproduct biases (Descioli, Asao, & Kurzban, 2012) and, when experimentally primed, produce dramatic differences in important areas of thought and behavior (Day, Fiske, Downing, & Trail, 2014; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundMeasuring pro-environmental orientation: Testing and building scales
Sparks, A., Ehret, P., & Brick, C. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101780 · Cited by 28
Changing Americans’ Attitudes about Immigration: Using Moral Framing to Bolster Factual Arguments
Voelkel, J. G., Malik, M., Redekopp, C., & Willer, R. (2022) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162221083877 · Cited by 37
Self-citationReducing the gap between pro‐environmental disposition and behavior: The role of feeling power
Dong, M., Vélez, G. F. P., & Wu, S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12733 · Cited by 32
“…a pro-environmental manner (Steg et al., 2013; Steg & Vlek, 2009; Vlek & Steg, 2007), such as the endorsement of biospheric values (Bouman et al., 2018; Stern et al., 1999), environmental concern (Fransson & Gärling, 1999), and pro-environmental attitudes (Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002), to name a few.”
BackgroundKim, I., Hammond, M. D., & Milfont, T. L. (2023) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.8557 · Cited by 33
“As noted, we based messages on the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (Graham et al., 2011) and prior experimental work using moral-focused environmental messages (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Hurst & Stern, 2020; Kidwell et al., 2013; Wolsko, 2017; Wolsko et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBergquist, P., Marlon, J., Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Rosenthal, S., & Leiserowitz, A. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2022.2030407 · Cited by 27
Morals and climate decision-making: insights from social and behavioural sciences
Lau, J. D., Song, A. M., Morrison, T. H., Fabinyi, M., Brown, K., Blythe, J. L., Allison, E. H., & Adger, W. N. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.005 · Cited by 38
Austin, M. M. K., & Converse, B. A. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101690 · Cited by 37
Sweetman, J., & Whitmarsh, L. E. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12178 · Cited by 31
“Beyond simply framing climate change messages to appeal to moral values (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Markowitz & Shariff, 2012) our findings go to the heart of deeper moral notions associate with “climate justice.””
BackgroundJustice and Environmental Sustainability
Clayton, S., Kals, E., & Feygina, I. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_20 · Cited by 27
Nan, X.-L., Wang, Y., Thier, K., Adebamowo, C. A., Quinn, S., & Ntiri, S. O. (2022) · Journal of health communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2022.2160526 · Cited by 26
Pairing geothermal technology and solar photovoltaics for net-zero energy homes
Neves, R., Cho, H., & Zhang, J. (2021) · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110749 · Cited by 26
Infection threat shapes our social instincts
Krämer, P., & Bressan, P. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-021-02975-9 · Cited by 30
Kim, I., Hammond, M. D., & Milfont, T. L. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101547 · Cited by 36
Wheeler, M., Larson, K. L., & Andrade, R. (2020) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-020-00928-0 · Cited by 26
Stewart, B. D., Gulzaib, F., & Morris, D. S. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01236 · Cited by 30
“The political orientation item has often been included within demographics in previous research (Fitzgerald and Wickwire, 2012; Feinberg and Willer, 2013; Crawford et al., 2015; Janoff-Bulman and Carnes, 2016).”
MethodStrategic Communication Research to Illuminate and Promote Public Engagement with Climate Change
Roser‐Renouf, C., & Maibach, E. W. (2018) · Nebraska Symposium on Motivation/The Nebraska symposium on motivation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96920-6_6 · Cited by 35
Measuring Moral Dimensions in Social Media with Mformer
Nguyen, T. D., Chen, Z.-Y., Carroll, N. G., Tran, A., Klein, C., & Xie, L.-X. (2023) · International Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.10219 · Cited by 25
“Previously, Feinberg and Willer (2013) showed that, on social media and news outlets, the moral rhetoric surrounding the environmental discourse primarily focuses on the harm/care foundation.”
BackgroundWhy Is Mother Earth on Life Support? Metaphors in Environmental Discourse
Flusberg, S. J., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12651 · Cited by 33
“By invoking the moral value of purity, it might appeal more to a conservative audience (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
Feinberg, M., Wehling, E., Chung, J. M., Saslow, L. R., & Paulin, I. M. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000255 · Cited by 24
Self-citationAfridi, F. E. A., Afridi, S. A., Zahid, R. M. A., Khan, W., & Anwar, W. (2023) · Environmental science and pollution research international · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-25449-z · Cited by 24
Alignment of values and political orientations amplifies climate change attitudes and behaviors
Smith, E. K., & Hempel, L. M. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03348-5 · Cited by 37
Simons, L., Engelmann, L., Arning, K., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.742109 · Cited by 24
“More so, it neglects that (non-)acceptance reactions in the population often reflect decision conflicts between societal goals, local impacts, and individual motives (Evans et al., 2013; Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundMoral reframing of messages about mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kaplan, J., Vaccaro, A. G., Henning, M., & Christov‐Moore, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37075-3 · Cited by 34
How pills undermine skills: Moralization of cognitive enhancement and causal selection
Mihailov, E., López, B. R., Cova, F., & Hannikainen, I. R. (2021) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2021.103120 · Cited by 28
Fernandes‐Jesus, M., Lima, M. L., & Cameselle, J. M. S. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1116 · Cited by 39
Dixon, G., & Hubner, A. Y. (2018) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547018769907 · Cited by 24
“Indeed, Feinberg and Willer (2013) present evidence that such an approach can reduce the effects of directional motivated reasoning for politically polarizing science issues, demonstrating that conservatives report greater belief in climate change when exposed to messages emphasizing morals that…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDemocratizing Evidence in Education
Tseng, V., Fleischman, S., & Quintero, E. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315268309-1 · Cited by 24
“Like Feinberg and Willer (2013), Kahan and colleagues (2012) concluded that the problem was not one of needing more information or a stronger ability to judge it.”
BackgroundJylhä, K. M., Stanley, S. K., Ojala, M., & Clarke, E. J. R. (2022) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000487 · Cited by 49
Toxic Chemical Governance Failure in the United States: Key Lessons and Paths Forward
Chiapella, A. M., Grabowski, Z. J., Rozance, M. A., Denton, A. D., Alattar, M., & Granek, E. F. (2019) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biz065 · Cited by 21
Explaining support for renewable energy: commitments to self-sufficiency and communion
Horne, C., & Kennedy, E. H. (2018) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1517917 · Cited by 23
Permitted to Build? Moral Foundations in Newspaper Framing of Mosque-Construction Controversies
Bowe, B. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017709253 · Cited by 23
“MFT has been widely used to study political discourse (Bowe & Hoewe, 2016; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009; Graham, Nosek, & Haidt, 2012; Haidt & Graham, 2007).”
Moving climate change beyond the tragedy of the commons
Brown, K., Adger, W. N., & Cinner, J. E. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.009 · Cited by 36
Which variables influence electric vehicle adoption?
Naseri, H., Waygood, E. O. D., Patterson, Z., & Wang, B. (2024) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-024-10525-1 · Cited by 16
Nguyen, V. H., Nguyen, T. H., Mai, L., Nguyễn, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. M. L., & Nguyễn, T. P. L. (2023) · Foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-06-2022-0065 · Cited by 22
Wigand, M. E., Timmermann, C., Scherp, A., Becker, T. M., & Steger, F. (2022) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2022gh000632 · Cited by 35
“Environmental attitudes are important indicators of pro-environmental behavior and can include moral aspects (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundMeasurement Invariance of Moral Foundations across Population Strata
Nilsson, A. (2022) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2022.2074853 · Cited by 22
Li, Z., Liang, L., Zhang, X., & Li, J. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2027748 · Cited by 33
The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension
Stanley, S. K., Klas, A., Clarke, E. J. R., & Walker, I. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246058 · Cited by 26
“For instance, existing appeals have found greater success motivating those holding a liberal political ideology through highlighting action on climate change as reflecting values of harm and care [19], necessary for the future PLOS ONE Replicating the temporal framing effect on environmentalism”
BackgroundDo Politicians 'Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is?' Ideology and Portfolio Choice
Aiken, A. L., Ellis, J. A., & Kang, M. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3175 · Cited by 30
Song, Y., & Luximon, Y. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051333 · Cited by 22
Incomplete professional identity goals override moral concerns
Marquardt, M. K., Gantman, A. P., Gollwitzer, P., & Oettingen, G. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.001 · Cited by 22
“In addition, Longoni, Gollwitzer, and Oettingen (2014) investigated identity goal pursuit among individuals strongly committed to the identity goal of being “green” or caring about the environment (a moral value for some; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundClimate Solidarity: A Framework and Research Agenda for Low‐Carbon Behavior
Bazzani, G. (2023) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12885 · Cited by 32
Self-focused value profiles relate to climate change skepticism in young adolescents
Grapsas, S., Becht, A., & Thomaes, S. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101978 · Cited by 21
Oswald, L., & Bright, J. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2071314 · Cited by 32
Children and Youth Environmental Action: The Case of Children and Youth with Disabilities
Salvatore, C., & Wolbring, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179950 · Cited by 28
Six minutes to promote change: People, not facts, alter students' perceptions on climate change
Sauer, K. A., Capps, D. K., Jackson, D. F., & Capps, K. A. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7553 · Cited by 81
Misch, A., Kristen, S., & Paulus, M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248353 · Cited by 26
Erceg, N., Burghart, M., Cottone, A., Lorimer, J., Manku, K., Pütz, H., Vlašiček, D., & Willems, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01913 · Cited by 22
Applying Moral Foundations Theory to Identify Terrorist Group Motivations
Hahn, L. S., Tamborini, R., Novotny, E., Grall, C., & Klebig, B. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12525 · Cited by 21
Moral foundations and voting intention in Italy
Milesi, P. (2017) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v13i4.1391 · Cited by 28
“…are relevant to the audience’s prevailing ones, e.g. a Sanctity-framed pro-environmental message that highlights how contaminated the environment has become and how important it is to clean it, addressed to a right-wing audience, it turns out to be especially persuasive (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundScales, D. A., Gorman, J. M., DiCaprio, P., Hurth, L., Radhakrishnan, M., Windham, S., Akunne, A., Florman, J., Leininger, L. J., & Starks, T. J. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107609 · Cited by 22
“For example, conservatives become more supportive of environmental legislation when framed in terms of traditional conservative priorities of purity and sanctity (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundI could but I don't: What does it take to adopt pro-environmental behaviors in the United States?
Lamm, A. E., McCann, R. G. H. B., & Howe, P. D. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102845 · Cited by 19
Two-Sided Messages Promote Openness for a Variety of Deeply Entrenched Attitudes
Xu, M., & Petty, R. E. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221128113 · Cited by 21
“Some studies have suggested that an effective method of changing morally based attitudes is to present people with moral (versus practical) arguments (Luttrell et al., 2019) or arguments that match the particular moral foundations of the attitude (Feinberg & Willer, 2013, 2015).”
Einav, G., Allen, O., Gur, T., Maaravi, Y., & Ravner, D. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4132351 · Cited by 20
The sanctity of life: The role of purity in attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia
Lockhart, C., Lee, C. H. J., Sibley, C., & Osborne, D. (2022) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12877 · Cited by 20
Landrum, A., & Vasquez, R. (2020) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.674 · Cited by 20
“Studies such as those conducted by Feinberg and Willer (2015) bolster the claim that Conservatives are more likely to perceive environmental concerns as moral concerns when framed in messaging that resonates with their broader moral foundations (e.”
BackgroundManaging the transformation of the global commons into luxuries for all
Cristini, H., & Kauppinen‐Räisänen, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.002 · Cited by 20
Johnson, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.008 · Cited by 42
Motivational Orientation Explains the Link between Political Ideology and Proenvironmental Behavior
Sherman, A. K., Rowe, A. J., Bird, S., Powers, S., & Legault, L. (2016) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2016.0029 · Cited by 27
“In line with previous research (e.g., Dietz et al., 1998; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Gromet et al., 2013), our proposed model expects that liber-alism should predict greater self-reported PEB.”
InfluentialWetts, R., Morris, H., Boykoff, M., McNally, B., Painter, J., Sanford, M., Diamond, E. P., Esteve-del-Valle, M., Loy, L., Perry, K. E., et al. (2025) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-025-03936-1 · Cited by 19
“…useful concepts that could guide such work, such as cognitive-emotional currents, motivated reasoning, moral value framing, multiple varieties of cultural resonance, and more (Attari, et al. 2014; Bail, et al. 2017 ; Hoffman 2015; Feinberg and Willer 2013; McDonnell et al. 2017; Wetts 2023).”
Using General Messages to Persuade on a Politicized Scientific Issue
Green, J., Druckman, J., Baum, M., Lazer, D., Ognyanova, K., Simonson, M. D., Lin, J., Santillana, M., & Perlis, R. (2022) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123422000424 · Cited by 19
Climate Change as a National Security Issue: Examining Framing Effects Across Party
Gainous, J., & Merry, M. K. (2021) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211053213 · Cited by 29
Parasocial diffusion: K-pop fandoms help drive COVID-19 public health messaging on social media
Chang, H.-C. H., Pham, B., & Ferrara, E. (2023) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100267 · Cited by 34
“The dimension of loyalty is crucial as loyalty is not just a crucial element organizational behavior, but can spur and motivate political action especially in the context of polarization [43–45].”
BackgroundInstrumental use erodes sacred values.
Ruttan, R. L., & Nordgren, L. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000343 · Cited by 19
Wanted: Heroic leaders to drive the transition to “business beyond usual”
Walls, J. L., Salaiz, A., & Chiu, S. (2020) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127020973379 · Cited by 29
Selinske, M., Fidler, F., Gordon, A., Garrard, G., Kusmanoff, A., & Bekessy, S. (2020) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12721 · Cited by 19
Cooperative conservation: Seven ways to save the world
Curry, O. S., Hare, D., Hepburn, C. J., JOHNSON, D. D. P., Buhrmester, M. D., Whitehouse, H., & Macdonald, D. W. (2019) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.123 · Cited by 33
Measuring Morality in Political Attitude Expression
Kraft, P. (2018) · Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/696862 · Cited by 19
“Research further suggests that moral framing in elite communication can elicit attitude change (e.g., Clifford et al. 2015; Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
BackgroundPresidential Appeals to Moral Foundations: How Modern Presidents Persuade Cross‐Ideologues
Miles, M. R. (2016) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12151 · Cited by 21
Dong, P., Huang, X., & Zhong, C. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614542344 · Cited by 24
“Previous research mainly focuses on demographic factors such as political view (Feinberg & Willer, 2013), race, and age as well as socioeconomic factors (Anderson & Cunningham, 1972; Webster, 1975) in predicting people’s environmental protection behavior.”
BackgroundClimate Change Advocacy and Engagement on Social Media
Hart, P. S., Feldman, L., Choi, S., Chinn, S., & Hiaeshutter-Rice, D. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470241284934 · Cited by 22
“Moral framing has been linked to pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors (Feinberg & Willer, 2013), although a justice-focused moral frame is more effective for liberals than conservatives (Wolsko et al., 2016).”
Open-mindedness: An integrative review of interventions.
Dolbier, S. Y., Dieffenbach, M. C., & Lieberman, M. D. (2024) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000491 · Cited by 17
“” Conversely, dominant group members tentatively bene fi ted more from hearing their partners ’ perspectives than from perspective-giving ( d = 0.33, Study 2 n.s.).”
InfluentialExploring and steering the moral compass of Large Language ModelsPreprint
Tlaie, A. (2024) · International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.17345 · Cited by 18
“Consistent with these moral values, individuals fitting this profile were also more actively engaged in social causes (40), such as environmen-talism, human rights advocacy, and animal welfare, reflecting their moral priorities through concrete actions.”
BackgroundDismantling Gender Blindness in Online Discussion of a Crime/Gender Dichotomy
Qin, Y., Duan, W., Wu, Q., & Lu, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3653686 · Cited by 19
“The closer it is between the framing and the persuasion target’s morality, the more likely the persuasion will succeed [39, 40].”
BackgroundAdvocating for Mask-Wearing Across the Aisle: Applying Moral Reframing in Health Communication
Luttrell, A., & Trentadue, J. T. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2163535 · Cited by 18
“…and using language such as “disease” and infection by a “foreign virus,” this message mirrors prior successful appeals to purity (e.g., Feinberg & Willer, 2013) and connects to an established relationship between political conservatism, disgust sensitivity (Terrizzi et al., 2013), and…”
BackgroundGeiger, N., Sarge, M. A., & Comfort, R. N. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2080242 · Cited by 26
Zaikauskaitė, L., Butler, G., Helmi, N. F. S., Robinson, C. L., Treglown, L., Tsivrikos, D., & Devlin, J. T. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.732661 · Cited by 34
“This led to (i) investigating developmental perspectives using Hoffman’s (1983) and Kohlberg’s (1984) theories, (ii) building in anthropocentric, biospheric, ecocentric, egoistic or non-environmental value orientations to experimental designs (Eckersley, 1992; Merchant, 1992; Thompson and Barton, 1994; Kortenkamp and…”
MethodPhilipp-Muller, A. Z., Teeny, J. D., & Petty, R. E. (2021) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1072 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Feinberg, M., & Willer, R.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feinberg, Matthew
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-12-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2120107374
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17
- FWCI
- 81.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Keywords
- environmental attitudes, moralization, political ideology, moral foundations, purity, reframing, environmental discourse, public service announcements
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Morals, Persuasive Communication, Politics, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review