The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Abstract
Americans' attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals' and conservatives' environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [277]
Citations
Cites
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574
Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/714000580 · Cited by 432
Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x · Cited by 155
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Bazerman M. H., 1999, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 39
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00826.x · DOI
- Boote A. S., 1981, Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 29
- 10.1177/1368430208098783 · DOI
- 10.1080/10463280240000082 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797610391911 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01523.x · DOI
- 10.1162/0011526042365555 · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026611404336 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00132.x · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017423 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013916596281006 · DOI
- Lakoff G., 1996, Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t
- 10.1017/S0022381608080742 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00475.x · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01204.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022198294003 · DOI
- 10.2307/1598934 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · DOI · Paper page
- Stern P. C., 1999, Human Ecology Review, 6, 81
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00775.x · DOI
- Wardekker A., 2008, Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations, and perceptions, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 777
The Balanced Structure of Environmental Identity
Bruni, C. M., Schultz, P. W., & Woodcock, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158168 · Cited by 20
Hekmatpour, P. (2020) · Social problems · doi:10.31235/osf.io/59dek · Cited by 18
Bègue, L., & Treich, N. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11071694 · Cited by 17
“Following the studies showing that congruency between environmental appeals and political values stimulates pro-environmental behavior [94,95], the design of future campaigns may thus be strengthened by including individual factors.”
BackgroundWang, X. (2016) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1179213 · Cited by 23
“It should be acknowledged that Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that party affiliation was associated with environmental attitudes and that democrats were more likely to be influenced by message appeals related to harm and risks than were conservatives.”
BackgroundSeeing Green: A Perceptual Model of Identity-Based Climate Change Judgments
Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2016) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2016.1215205 · Cited by 25
“These effects were mediated by feelings of disgust, which were more intense among conservative participants as compared to liberal participants in the Purity/Sanctity framing condition (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundResultParcha, J. M. (2024) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/23294884241283808 · Cited by 17
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) “found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives.”
Phillips, L. T., Kreps, T. A., & Chugh, D. (2024) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104333 · Cited by 20
Wetts, R. (2023) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/726747 · Cited by 24
The effects of short messages encouraging prevention behaviors early in the COVID-19 pandemic
Pink, S. L., Stagnaro, M. N., Chu, J., Mernyk, J. S., Voelkel, J. G., & Willer, R. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284354 · Cited by 23
Self-citationHow Personality Relates to Attitudes Toward Diversity and Workplace Diversity Initiatives
Lall-Trail, S., Salter, N. P., & Xu, X. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211057755 · Cited by 28
Reflections on extracting moral foundations from media content
Hopp, F. R., & Weber, R. (2021) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2021.1963513 · Cited by 20
Niemiec, R., Jones, M. S., Mertens, A., & Dillard, C. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105293 · Cited by 17
“Literature suggests that the impact of different message framings on behavior may vary by audience (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Myers et al., 2012; Niemiec, Sekar, et al., 2020).”
BackgroundFully experimental conceptual engineering
Andow, J. (2020) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2020.1850339 · Cited by 17
“Now suppose, through empirical (Feinberg and Willer 2010, 2012; Corner and Pidgeon 2015; Whitmarsh and Corner 2017; Whitmarsh, Xenias, and Jones 2019; Hurst and Stern 2020), and monitoring uptake in key domains (Beck et al. 2015).”
Moral motives, police legitimacy and acceptance of force
Silver, J. (2020) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-04-2020-0056 · Cited by 17
The Moral Foundations of Human Rights Attitudes
Stolerman, D., & Lagnado, D. A. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12539 · Cited by 27
“MFT has also been investigated in relation to opinions on specific political topics, including environmental attitudes (Feinberg & Willer, 2012; Wolsko, Ariceaga, & Seiden, 2016), “culture war” attitudes such as abortion, euthanasia, and animal testing (Koleva, Graham, Iyer, Ditto, & Haidt, 2012),…”
BackgroundHoogendoorn, G., Sütterlin, B., & Siegrist, M. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.003 · Cited by 21
Bowe, B., & Hoewe, J. (2016) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699016628806 · Cited by 17
“MFT was developed to examine morality at the cultural—rather than the individual—level (Haidt et al., 2009) and therefore offers promise for examining political discourse (e.g., Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Graham et al., 2009; Graham et al., 2012; Haidt & Graham, 2007).”
BackgroundRaut, R. K., Kumar, R., & Das, N. (2025) · Journal of Global Responsibility · doi:10.1108/jgr-01-2024-0002 · Cited by 14
Experimental evidence of moral cleansing in the interpersonal and environmental domains
Fanghella, V., & Thøgersen, J. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101838 · Cited by 16
Thomas-Walters, L., Cheung, H., Lee, T.-M., Wan, A., & Wang, Y. (2020) · doi:10.1002/pan3.10127 · Cited by 16
More Than Idyll Speculation: Utopian Thinking for Planetary Health
Fernando, J., O'Brien, L. V., Judge, M., & Kashima, Y. (2019) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe10010016 · Cited by 16
Paying attention to waste: Apple’s circular economy
Vonk, L. (2018) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2018.1525923 · Cited by 16
“As such, electronic waste, and the material practises of the media, have been the focus of both scholarly and popular attention, with authors like Jennifer Gabrys (2011, 2014), Richard Maxwell and Toby Miller (2012), and Sy Taffel (2012, 2013) offering thoughtful critiques, and organizations like Greenpeace and the Ba…”
BackgroundThe Relationship Between Dialectical Beliefs and Proenvironmental Behaviors
Li, L. M. W., Mei, D., Li, W., & Lee, H. (2018) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916518799821 · Cited by 16
Examining the “Why” of Vaccine Hesitancy
Bednarczyk, R. (2018) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000596 · Cited by 16
“This type of value-tailored messaging has been shown to address differences across the political spectrum with regard to climate change (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundHow convincing are AI-generated moral arguments for climate action?
Nisbett, N., & Spaiser, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2023.1193350 · Cited by 16
“While, Feinberg and Willer (2013) tested only the purity framing and found that it increased right-leaning individuals’ pro-environmental attitudes.”
BackgroundInfluentialConte, B., Brosch, T., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102026 · Cited by 15
Lexical Ambiguity in Political Rhetoric: Why Morality Doesn't Fit in a Bag of Words
Kraft, P., & Klemmensen, R. (2023) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712342300008x · Cited by 30
“…been linked to more specific attitudes such as towards the poor (Low and Wui 2015), foreign policy (Kertzer et al. 2014), environmental protection (Feinberg and Willer 2013), contentious social issues like abortion (Koleva et al. 2012), and political preferences expressed in open-ended responses…”
BackgroundAccidental environmentalist or ethical elite? The moral dimensions of environmental impact
Kennedy, E. H., & Horne, C. (2020) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101448 · Cited by 12
Hurst, K. F., Stern, M. J., Hull, R. B., & Axsom, D. (2020) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13428 · Cited by 15
Framing hate: Moral foundations, party cues, and (in)tolerance of offensive speech
Armstrong, G. M., & Wronski, J. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1006 · Cited by 24
Moral judgments and impressions
Wojciszke, B., Parzuchowski, M., & Bocian, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.028 · Cited by 18
An agenda for science communication research and practice
Druckman, J. N., Ellenbogen, K. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Yanovitzky, I. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2400932122 · Cited by 21
“…in literacy or epistemic knowledge ( 26 ), reframing a topic to alter opinions in a normatively desirable direction such as support for climate change initiatives ( 27 ), or intervening to prevent or update misperceptions as was widely discussed during the so - called COVID - 19 “infodemic” ( 28 ).”
Breaking Climate Change Polarization
Çakanlar, A. (2024) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/07439156241244737 · Cited by 18
“Another way to reduce reactance among conservatives regarding the climate is to employ congruent appeals that align with their values (Feinberg and Willer 2013; Scharmer and Snyder 2021).”
Sustainability, Collective Self‐Regulation, and Human–Nature Interdependence
Kashima, Y., Sewell, D. K., & Li, Y. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12668 · Cited by 22
Framing Climate Change Impacts as Moral Violations: The Pathway of Perceived Message Credibility
Huang, J., Yang, J. Z., & Chu, H. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19095210 · Cited by 22
“liberals tend to view environmental protection as a moral issue, while conservatives do not [25].”
BackgroundKennedy, E. H., & Muzzerall, P. (2021) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642211056258 · Cited by 19
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) applied moral foundations theory in an environmental issue context.”
BackgroundBuchanan, T., Ackland, J., Lloyd, S., van der Linden, S., & de‐Wit, L. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03262-2 · Cited by 15
“Research in the USA found that conservatives were likely to respond to messages framed in terms of pollution, mentioning contaminated water or forests strewn with garbage (Feinberg & Willer 2012).”
BackgroundScharmer, A. K., & Snyder, M. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101643 · Cited by 14
Pasaribu, D., Martens, P., & Takwin, B. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254880 · Cited by 14
“By way of explaining this mixed result, the present study suggests that individuals’ interpretation of religious scripture as the result of communication framing may be important [43, 87].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGrünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656725 · Cited by 14
“logical associations between political orientation and phenomena as environmentalism (Feinberg and Willer, 2013; Wolsko et al., 2016).”
BackgroundExperiments on Problems of Climate Change
McGrath, M. C. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108777919.039 · Cited by 14
Place‐based Identity and Framing in Local Environmental Politics
Daneri, D. R., Krasny, M., & Stedman, R. (2021) · doi:10.1111/ropr.12415 · Cited by 14
Daziano, R. A., Waygood, E., Patterson, Z., Feinberg, M., & Wang, B.-B. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123669 · Cited by 14
Self-citationNoncoercive human intelligence gathering.
Dando, C. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000724 · Cited by 18
“Positive framing has been shown to increase the power of persuasive messages in other domains (e.g., Feinberg & Willer, 2013, 2015; Pelletier & Sharp, 2008) but has not been empirically evaluated in intelligence interviewing.”
BackgroundDo Green Behaviors Earn Social Status?
Kennedy, E. H., & Horne, C. (2019) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023119836330 · Cited by 23
Moral (dis)engagement with anthropogenic climate change in online comments on newspaper articles
Woods, R., Coen, S., & Fernández, A. (2018) · Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.2355 · Cited by 14
Education Inequality: Broadening Public Attitudes through Framing
Eng, N. (2016) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12189 · Cited by 17
“For conservatives, however, the latter frame resonates more, according to Feinberg and Willer (2013), because it relates to values they identify with (like religiosity and traditionalism).”
Relationships between religion, moral foundations, and environmentalism in young adult Catholics
Skalski-Bednarz, S., Konaszewski, K., Toussaint, L. L., Kwiatkowska, A., & Surzykiewicz, J. (2023) · Journal of Religious Education · doi:10.1007/s40839-023-00198-w · Cited by 13
“Previous research has shown that individual differences in the validity of particular moral foundations (based on generalized moral intuitions) may be associated with different conservation attitudes and actions (Bamberg & Möser, 2007; Dickinson et al., 2016; Farrell, 2011; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundMoral Foundations, Himpathy, and Punishment Following Organizational Sexual Misconduct Allegations
Dodson, S. J., Goodwin, R. D., Graham, J., & Diekmann, K. A. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1652 · Cited by 18
The science behind “values”: Applying moral foundations theory to strategic foresight
Mills, B., & Wilner, A. S. (2022) · FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE · doi:10.1002/ffo2.145 · Cited by 13
Goff, K., Silver, E., & Iceland, J. (2022) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231221110277 · Cited by 17
To Be Authentic, to Be Eco: Exploring the Link Between Authenticity and Pro-environmental Behavior
Yang, Y., Zhu, S., Gan, Y.-L., & Dang, J.-H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755860 · Cited by 13
“Meanwhile, individuals who endorse selftranscendent values (e.g., environmentalism) are more likely to feel moral obligations toward the environment (Karp, 1996; Schultz and Zelezny, 1998; Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundHundemer, S., Monroe, M. C., & Kaplan, D. (2021) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127230 · Cited by 39
The dynamics of humanistic and biospheric altruism in conflicting choice environments
Conte, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110599 · Cited by 13
Why moral advocacy leads to polarization and proselytization: The role of self-persuasion
Abeywickrama, R. S., Rhee, J. J.-S., Crone, D. L., & Laham, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1346 · Cited by 14
Nuclear accident reminders and support for nuclear energy: Paradoxical effect
Selimbegović, L., Chatard, A., Er-rafiy, A., & Pyszczynski, T. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.004 · Cited by 13
Bastian, B., Zhang, A.-R., & Moffat, K. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134863 · Cited by 13
“Increasingly, these conflicts are understood from a moral perspective [2, 3, 4], with research showing that up to 45% of undergraduate students recognize global warming in ethical terms [5].”
BackgroundArpan, L. M., Opel, A., & Lu, J. (2013) · Applied Environmental Education & Communication · doi:10.1080/1533015x.2013.838875 · Cited by 13
“…most messages promoting proenvironmental behaviors in the United States are framed in terms of self-transcendent values (concern about other humans and/or nature), focusing on sacrifice and personal costs necessary to achieve broader goals (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Schultz & Zelezny, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow to effectively communicate about greenhouse gas emissions with different populations
Wang, B., Waygood, E. O. D., Ji, X., Naseri, H., Latulipe-Loiselle, A., Daziano, R. A., Patterson, Z., & Feinberg, M. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.015 · Cited by 21
Self-citationFacing trade-offs: The variability of public support for climate change policies
Rettig, L., Gärtner, L., & Schoen, H. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.020 · Cited by 12
Herberz, M., Brosch, T., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101972 · Cited by 14
The chemical landscape of tropical mammals in the Anthropocene
Chapman, C. A., Steiniche, T., Benavidez, K. M., Sarkar, D., Amato, K. R., Serio‐Silva, J. C., Venier, M., & Wasserman, M. D. (2022) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109522 · Cited by 16
“…the negatives effects of chemicals released into the environment (Landrigan et al., 2018), strong public support for protecting the environment (Feinberg and Willer, 2013), inequitable distribution of exposure to toxic chemicals that calls for fairer treatment (Landrigan et al., 2018), and…”
BackgroundChung, E., & Milkoreit, M. (2021) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2021.1992287 · Cited by 18
A motivational systems approach to investigating opinions on climate change
Molden, D. C., Bayes, R., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2021.1982003 · Cited by 12
Designing for Engaging with News using Moral Framing towards Bridging Ideological Divides
Wang, J., Zhang, A. X., & Karger, D. R. (2021) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3492861 · Cited by 12
Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain
Hahnel, U. J. J., Mumenthaler, C., Spampatti, T., & Brosch, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208429 · Cited by 14
“Similar to previous research [28], political ideology was assessed using a range from 1 (extremely liberal) to 11 (extremely conservative).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAgency in Earth System Governance
Betsill, M. M., Benney, T. M., Gerlak, A. K., Brown, C., Chan, S., Enechi, O., Mitchell, R., Möller, I., Patterson, J., Scobie, M., et al. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688277 · Cited by 52
Delineating the Influence of Emotion and Reason on Morality and Punishment
Olatunji, B. O., & David, B. (2014) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000010 · Cited by 13
“However, reframing some political issues in moral terms that capitalizes on common ground may reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives on various issues (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundThe roles of anthropomorphism, spirituality, and gratitude in pro-environmental attitudes
White, C., & Billet, M. I. (2024) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2024.2363759 · Cited by 16
“…relevant emotion, and it is therefore possible that the views of nature examined in this work can also influence environmental attitudes through other emotions, like guilt (Eom, Tok, et al., 2021; Tam, 2019) or moral emotions like disgust and outrage (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Rottman et al., 2015).”
Koçak, Ö., & Puranam, P. (2022) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2022.0008 · Cited by 11
Argüello‐Gutiérrez, C., López‐Rodríguez, L., & Vázquez, A. (2023) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231162161 · Cited by 11
“Manipulation of moral arguments have been found to reinforce certain political attitudes (Feinberg & Willer, 2012) as well as environmental attitudes and charitable giving (e.g., Feinberg et al., 2020; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Feygina et al., 2010; Winterich et al., 2012).”
BackgroundWu, T.-L., & Liu, H.-T. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15075772 · Cited by 11
The moral significance of protecting environmental and cultural objects
Bastian, B. B., Crimston, C. R., Klebl, C., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280393 · Cited by 14
Countering Identity-protective Responses to Climate Change Data
Akin, H., Hardy, B. W., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1776359 · Cited by 14
What is an endangered species?: judgments about acceptable risk
Offer-Westort, T., Feltz, A., Bruskotter, J., & Vucetich, J. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab5cc8 · Cited by 11
Perceived Morality and Antiatheist Prejudice: A Replication and Extension
Simpson, A., McCurrie, C. H., & Morrison, K. R. (2019) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2019.1568142 · Cited by 10
From cash to crickets: The non-monetary value of a resource can promote human cooperation
Bastian, B., Brewer, M., Duffy, J., & van Lange, P. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.002 · Cited by 11
A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition
Feinberg, M., & Wehling, E. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193347 · Cited by 24
Self-citationCan Cartoons Influence Americans' Attitudes Toward Bailouts?
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2017) · Visual Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15551393.2016.1230472 · Cited by 11
“…immigration, and terrorism, among many others (Brewer, 2001, 2003; Chong & Druckman, 2007; Crandall, Eidelman, Skitka, & Morgan, 2009; Druckman, 2001; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Iyengar, 1990, 1991; Kinder & Sanders, 1990; Nelson, Oxley, & Clawson, 1997; Nelson & Garst, 2005; Rasinski, 1989; Shen &…”
Kinship appeals and conservation social marketing
Qirko, H. N. (2017) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1297-9 · Cited by 11
Sun, B., & Xi, Y. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14080712 · Cited by 12
Cha, M.-K., Struthers, C. L., Brown, M. A., Kale, S., & Chapman, O. (2024) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2024.120382 · Cited by 17
Kershaw, J. C., Nolden, A., Brown, A. R. C., Hites, T., & Jefferies, L. (2023) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105039 · Cited by 10
Tian, T.-Y. Y., King, B. G., & Smith, E. B. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3534 · Cited by 10
Kay, C. S., & Dimakis, S. (2022) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2022.2132576 · Cited by 10
“Second, it suggests that one way to decrease homonegativity and transnegativity among people with antagonistic personality traits is to reframe issues of intolerance and discrimination in terms of moral beliefs that they would be more likely to appreciate (see Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundMoral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations
Morris, D. S. M., & Stewart, B. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869121 · Cited by 15
“Research on moral framing of issues has begun to hint that framing policies with moral foundations may persuade people who invest in the relevant foundations (Feinberg and Willer, 2013; Kidwell et al., 2013).”
BackgroundLessons from an experiment with values‐based messaging to support watershed conservation
Marquina, T. G., Hackenburg, D. M., Duray, H., Fisher, B., & Gould, R. K. (2022) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13910 · Cited by 18
“…communication strategies that segment and target audiences based on sociodemographic, geographic, or cultural characteristics can result in more effective outcomes than strategies that employ a single communication strategy across all segments (Dayer et al., 2014; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundERP Study of Liberals’ and Conservatives’ Moral Reasoning Processes: Evidence from South Korea
Yun, J. H., Kim, Y., & Lee, E. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04734-2 · Cited by 15
Their Economy and Our Health: Communicating Climate Change to the Divided American Public
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17217718 · Cited by 15
“Even among climate change deniers, the reasons behind motivated reasoning differ [10,18,19].”
BackgroundMonroe, A., Wyngaarden, J., & Plant, E. A. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620923854 · Cited by 10
“…moral values influence a broad array of attitudinal and behavioral outcomes including care and sanctity motivating pro-environmental attitudes (Feinberg & Willer, 2013), care increasing the willingness to help the poor (Low & Wui, 2015), sanctity predicting the condemnation of suicide…”
BackgroundIndividual differences predict endorsement of water resilience
Baird, J., Dale, G., & Farhad, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62896-x · Cited by 10
Assessing public support for degrowth: survey-based experimental and predictive studies
Krpan, D., Bassó, F., Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101326 · Cited by 12
Why the right resists veg(etari)anism: Ideological commitment to consuming animal products
Ioannidou, M., Harlow, G., Patel, M., Leach, S., Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2025) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105769 · Cited by 7
Miller, L. B. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17072832 · Cited by 15
A Scientific Discussion of Post-Materialism Values and Environmental Behavior
Peterson, T., & Tollefson, K. (2024) · Businesses · doi:10.3390/businesses4030022 · Cited by 9
“When pro-environmental appeals were reframed in terms of purity, a value resonating more with conservatives, the difference in environmental attitudes was reduced [19].”
BackgroundBolte, S., Klackl, J., Hansen, J., Jonas, E., & Uhl-Haedicke, I. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102330 · Cited by 11
A Passion for Virtue? Appeals to Morality and Emotions in European Parliament Climate Change Debates
Salgado, R. M. S., & Bos, L. (2024) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642241242036 · Cited by 9
“In the realm of the environment, Feinberg and Willer (2013) showed that only liberals view the environment in moral terms, which can be explained by the fact that climate discourse at the time of their study was mostly connected to a narrative emphasizing individualizing moral concerns about harm…”
Pender, A. (2023) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2023.100174 · Cited by 12
What Makes an Environmental Steward? An Individual Differences Approach
Plummer, R., Baird, J., & Dale, G. (2022) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327121x16141642287773 · Cited by 9
Aberman, Y., & Plaks, J. E. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.105980 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Feinberg, M., & Willer, R.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feinberg, Matthew
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-12-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2120107374
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17
- FWCI
- 81.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Keywords
- environmental attitudes, moralization, political ideology, moral foundations, purity, reframing, environmental discourse, public service announcements
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Morals, Persuasive Communication, Politics, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review