Cited by 928Pro-Environmental Behavior and AttitudesPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentClimate Change Communication and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes

Feinberg, Matthew, Willer, Robb·2013·Psychological Science

DOI 10.1177/0956797612449177

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Americans' attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals' and conservatives' environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797612449177

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574
Politics and environment in America: partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism.
Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/714000580 · Cited by 432
Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x · Cited by 155

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

Bazerman M. H., 1999, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 39
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00826.x · DOI
Boote A. S., 1981, Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 29
10.1177/1368430208098783 · DOI
10.1080/10463280240000082 · DOI
10.1177/0956797610391911 · DOI
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01523.x · DOI
10.1162/0011526042365555 · DOI
10.1177/1086026611404336 · DOI
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00132.x · DOI
10.1037/a0017423 · DOI
10.1177/0013916596281006 · DOI
Lakoff G., 1996, Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t
10.1017/S0022381608080742 · DOI
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00475.x · DOI
10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · DOI
10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · DOI · Paper page
10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01204.x · DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629 · DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 · DOI
10.1177/0022022198294003 · DOI
10.2307/1598934 · DOI
10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 · DOI · Paper page
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x · DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · DOI · Paper page
Stern P. C., 1999, Human Ecology Review, 6, 81
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00775.x · DOI
Wardekker A., 2008, Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations, and perceptions, 53

Sorted by citations

Items 701–777 of 777

Media responsibility and maternal health: Confronting cultural misinformation on sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in Nigeria
Essien, E. (2025) · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3578
Messaging Impacts Public Perspectives Towards Fur Farming in the Northeastern United States
Kogan, L. R., Niemiec, R. M., & Mertens, A. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15213158
The Climate-Health Communication Gap: Connecting the Dots to Drive Climate Health Action
Smith, R., Chen, K., Winner, D., & Friedhoff, S. (2025) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2025.2576158
“…the status-quo which contributes to climate denialism) among conserva-tives, and messages that frame environmental degradation as a purity violation (being dirty, disgusting and impure) increase concern and support for environmental legislation (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Feygina et al., 2010).”
Navigating justice tensions in managed retreat
Bower, E., Siders, A. R., Kraan, C. M., Mach, K. J., & Wong‐Parodi, G. (2025) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104191 · Cited by 2
When moose cross the screen: Fostering human–nature connections through a Swedish Slow TV nature broadcast
Truong, M.-X. A., van Heel, B. F., & van den Born, R. V. D. (2025) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.70166
“• Stewardship of Nature reflects a belief that while humans hold a privileged position, they also bear an ethical responsibility for protecting the environment, often grounded in religious or moral duty (Feinberg & Willer, 2013 ).”
Moral reframing accuracy is enhanced through an educational intervention: Evidence from the Perspectives program
Selterman, D., Welker, K., & Duong, M. T. (2025) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2025.2537051
“…was reframed to reflect purity values that resonate more strongly for conservatives (with images showing disgusting pollution or garbage landfills), this rendered the difference between liberal and conservative participants’ environmental attitudes as non-significant (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
When Green Turns Gray: The Double‐Edged Spillover Effects From Green Behavior to Time Theft via Dual Feedback Loops of Moral Self‐Regulation
Zhang, R., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Luo, Y. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1111/1744-7941.70021
Amoral barriers to eco-engagement: how and when supervisor bottom‑line mentality inhibits Extra-role employee green behavior
Zhang, R., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Luo, Y. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07951-4 · Cited by 1
“…Faraz et al., 2021; Robertson & Barling, 2013; Yuan et al., 2023), these broad frameworks often fail to address the moral nature inherent in EEGB (Feinberg & Willer, 2013) and the moral reasoning processes employees may engage in when navigating conflicts between performance pressures and moral…”
The Effects of Disgust Messages on Plant‐Based Food Choice: Exploring Underlying Processes and Boundary Conditions
Carfora, V., Festa, S., Pompili, S., Azzena, I., Scaglioni, G., Lenzi, M., Carraro, L., Catellani, P., & Guidetti, M. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13102 · Cited by 3
The climate battle in America
Gaele, C., Okonski, L., & Martínez-Cruz, A. L. (2025) · Metaphor and the Social World · doi:10.1075/msw.24015.gae
Moraaliset intuitiot poliittisen ideologian taustalla
Helminen, V. (2025) · Psykologia · doi:10.62443/psykologia.v51i6.145256
Emergence and Development of a News Hate Cycle About Immigrants: The Case of Immigrants Transferred from the Canary Islands to the Spanish Mainland
Martínez, P. R., Villanueva, A. S., Campos, P., Joya, L. M., Sánchez, A. J. S., Espinosa, J. J. S., Lirola, F. V., & Berlanga, M. (2025) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia6010005
Proximity to anti-fracking protests: public attitudes about disruption and hydraulic-fracturing risks
Palmer, R., Stretesky, P., Stephenson, C., & Short, D. (2024) · Social Movement Studies · doi:10.1080/14742837.2024.2410328
“…with environmental protests (i.e., environmental justice discourse) while conservatives are more critical of the environmental movement and may be more likely to reject the movement's messages about the risks posed by hydraulic fracturing (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; McCright & Dunlap, 2010).”
Background
Intensi Masyarakat terhadap Pariwisata Berkelanjutan
Nugroho, R., & Suwaryono, I. L. (2024) · Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis · doi:10.37034/infeb.v6i4.969
“Saat ini, penelitian mengenai hal-hal yang mempengaruhi intensi perilaku wisatawan untuk memilih destinasi wisata berkelanjutan masih terbatas [20], terutama dengan lokus di Indonesia.”
Background
Moral value conflicts in the German debate about genetically engineered foods
Waldhof, G. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety · doi:10.1007/s00003-024-01519-3
“…emotionality, and normative judgments − suggest a potential moralization of the issue (Ellemers et al. 2019; Feinberg et al. 2019; Skitka et al. 2005; Scott et al. 2016; Baron and Spranca 1997; Tetlock et al. 2000 ; Ditto and Koleva 2011; Feinberg and Willer 2013 ; Matthes and Kohring 2008).”
Status politics is the origin of morality policy
Wendell, D. G., & Tatalovich, R. (2023) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2023.11 · Cited by 1
Morality analysis: Reducing moral backlash to public policy
Mills, B. (2023) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/capa.12522
Semantic Processing of Political Words in Naturalistic Information Differs by Political Orientation
Kitamura, S., & Ihara, A. S. (2023) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.07369
“Previous studies found that moral (re)framing had a strong effect on conservatives [40, 41], whereas scientific framing backfired with them [42].”
Culturally Relevant Frames Increase Individuals’ Motivation to Contribute to Carbon Emissions Offsets
Lau, E. H., Rattan, A., Romero‐Canyas, R., & Savani, K. (2022) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/00220221221110465
Psicología ambiental: un breve recorrido por la disciplina
Jota, D. C. (2021) · Persona · doi:10.26439/persona2021.n024(2).5212
ELECTROMOVILIDAD Y RETÓRICA POLÍTICA: RECURSOS NATURALES, NACIONALISMO TECNOLÓGICO Y MORAL VERDE EN BOLIVIA
Jerez, F. A. G. (2021) · Sociologia & Antropologia · doi:10.1590/2238-38752021v11310
Behavioral Economics for the End of the World: Limitations on the use of Moral Foundations to Shift Environmental Attitudes
Gamerman, M. (2021) · doi:10.1184/r1/16766533.v1
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) present evidence that politically conservative individuals demonstrate differential response to pro-environmental messaging depending on the rhetorical approach that messaging uses.”
Background
The Features of the Environmental Behavior of the Urban Population and the Mechanisms of its Improvement
Balova, S., Blyagoz, N. S., Zvorykina, T. I., Martynova, M., Korotaeva, I., & Biryukov, V. A. (2021) · Revista Gestão Inovação e Tecnologias · doi:10.47059/revistageintec.v11i4.2137
Environmental culture development in population
Dvoichenkova, G., Chernysheva, E., Dzyubuk, I. M., Meshcheryakov, K. Y., & Kirichenko, E. (2021) · Laplage em Revista · doi:10.24115/s2446-622020217extra-c1029p.414-430
Environmental justice expansion in the context of fracking
Zimny, S., & Reardon, M. C. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-021-00668-3
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that liberals were more likely to view the environment in terms of the harm/care dimension than conservatives.”
Background
Anger and Democratic Values in the Mass Public
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.006
Index
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.010
Preface
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.001
Bibliography
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.009
The Rise of Anger in the American Public
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.002
The Causal Effect of Anger on Trust in Government
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.005
Anger and the Future of American Government
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.008
Trait-Based Anger and Governmental Distrust
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.004
Political Elites and the Strategic Use of Anger
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.003
Anger and Voter Loyalty
Webster, S. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868303.007
Voter Punishment Is Rare but Real
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.005
Legislators Reject Half-Loaf Compromises Because They Fear Voter Retribution
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.003
References
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.008
Legislators Reject Half-Loaf Compromises
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.002
Rejecting Compromise, Getting Gridlock
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.001
Structuring Negotiations in the Shadow of Primary Voter Punishment
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.006
Compromise, Voter Punishment in Primaries, and Legislative Gridlock
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.007
ESG–Agency Harvesting Database
Betsill, M. M., Benney, T. M., & Gerlak, A. K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688277.016
Index
Betsill, M. M., Benney, T. M., & Gerlak, A. K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688277.017
Framing Environmental Dilemmas: The Ethical Positioning of the Seal Hunt In Two Canadian Newspapers
Safarov, R. (2019) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-23971
“…environment are rooted in morality and, as such, it is impossible to discuss environmental dilemmas without simultaneously considering the ethical and moral obligations of people to other people and to nature (Jia et al., 2017; Öhman, 2016; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Jamieson, 2008; Falhquist, 2009).”
Background
Sustainable Consumption
Silva, F. J. G., & Gouveia, R. M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23165-1_4 · Cited by 9
Academic Climate Advocacy and Activism
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.007
It’s Not You, It’s Me … Well It’s Actually Us
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.006
Silver Buckshot
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.008
Search for Meaning
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.009
Here and Now
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.002
Preface: Creativity, Collaboration, Confrontation
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.001
Ways of Learning, Ways of Knowing
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.005
Navigating the storm: A neuropsychological map of Western extremism
Ligouri, L. (2019) · Prospects · doi:10.1007/s11125-019-09451-3
Developing an Instructional Package of Environmental Education (EnMor Book) Based On Ecology In Improving Student’s Environmental Moral Behavior
Hutasoit, I. (2017) · doi:10.21009/ijeem.021.03
Countering division with friendliness: How feeling understood by a friendly AI triggers both openness and resistance
Huber, R. J. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108870
The limits of moral framing in promoting pro-environmentalism: A preregistered replication of
Voit, M., Twardawski, M., & Fischer, M. V. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104871 · Cited by 1
Toward low-carbon diets: Exploring the role of climate perceptions and household mitigation practices in reducing meat consumption
Tran, L., & Su, Y. (2026) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109188
La adaptación al cambio climático: nociones y enfoques desde la perspectiva jurídica e institucional
Chavarría, C. Z., Vélez, V. V., Cárdenas, M. F., & Escobar, J. F. (2025) · Estudios de derecho · doi:10.17533/udea.esde.v82n179a01
Decoding CulturePreprint
Koçak, Ö., & Puranam, P. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4009087
“Research on “ moral reframing ” (Feinberg and Willer 2013, 2015, 2019; also see Howard-Grenville et. al 2017; Kahan and Braman 2006) provides a nice illustration.”
Background
Pano: Engaging with News using Moral Framing towards Bridging Ideological Divides
Wang, J., Zhang, A. X., & Karger, D. R. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11231
A Critical Appraisal of Ribes’ Theory of Psychology
Neves, H., & Magalhães, T. D. O. (2021) · Contemporary Behaviorisms in Debate · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_20
The Role of Religious Orientation and Ethical Ideologies in Environmental Concerns amongst Teachers and School Staff in East Java, Indonesia
Pasaribu, D., Martens, P., & Takwin, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences · doi:10.5220/0010755400003112
“One study points out that reframing environmental discourse in multiple religious teaching interpretations reduces the gap in environmental concern between liberals and conservatives (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
Influence of Morally Framed Messaging and Source Credibility on Environmental Attitudes
Luna, G. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 AERA Annual Meeting · doi:10.3102/1587598
“And yet, past researchers using messages to influence environmental attitudes (Feinberg & Willer 2013; 2015; Wolsko et al., 2016; 2017; Hurst & Stern, 2020) did not include a logo representing the source of the messages in their studies.”
BackgroundInfluential
New Economic Paradigms
Collste, D. (2020) · Encyclopedia of the World's Biomes · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.12446-7
Agency and Norms: Who Defines What Ought to Be?
Angstadt, J. M., & Möller, I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688277.010
Agency and Adaptiveness: Navigating Change and Transformation
Patterson, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688277.012
Why do people choose their beliefs? : a new pluralist perspective on belief regulation
Jettinghoff, W. (2020) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0394105 · Cited by 1
“Feinberg & Willer (2013) found that people of opposing political parties held different beliefs about the environment, in part, due to their different moral concerns.”
Background
Index
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375.009
Psychometrics, Model Generation, and Data
Madsen, J. K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22145-4_7
References
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.010
Content and prevalence of environmentalist stereotypes in Canada : a psychological perspective
Williams, E. A. (2017) · doi:10.14288/1.0354453
“Research in the USA demonstrated that the level of environmental concern of liberals and conservatives in response to environmental messages depended on the moral terms in which the issues were communicated (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
Background
Language, Frames, and Narratives
Corner, A., & Clarke, J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46744-3_4 · Cited by 1
A Change in Our Climate Perspective
Teppert, K. (2017) · doi:10.1021/bk-2017-1247.ch008
Denken in Worten
Wehling, E. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-18951-2_37
An intergroup perspective on attitude moralization
Leal, A. (n.d.) · doi:10.33612/diss.826387152
Collaboration in Conservation: Examining Environmental Policy Perspectives Among Ranchers in Rural America
Braun, A. (n.d.) · doi:10.56902/etdcrp.2026.29

Authors: Feinberg, M., & Willer, R.
Affiliations: Stanford University (US)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author: Feinberg, Matthew
ORCID: Feinberg, Matthew
Willer, Robb
Venue: Psychological Science
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2012-12-10
Volume: 24
Issue: 1
Pages: 56-62
ISSN: 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
1467-9280
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612449177
OpenAlex: W2120107374
Cited by: 928
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 74 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17
FWCI: 81.04
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords: environmental attitudes, moralization, political ideology, moral foundations, purity, reframing, environmental discourse, public service announcements
MeSH terms: Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Morals, Persuasive Communication, Politics, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Record

About these checks