The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Abstract
Americans' attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals' and conservatives' environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [277]
Citations
Cites
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574
Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/714000580 · Cited by 432
Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x · Cited by 155
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Bazerman M. H., 1999, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 39
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00826.x · DOI
- Boote A. S., 1981, Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 29
- 10.1177/1368430208098783 · DOI
- 10.1080/10463280240000082 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797610391911 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01523.x · DOI
- 10.1162/0011526042365555 · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026611404336 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00132.x · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017423 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013916596281006 · DOI
- Lakoff G., 1996, Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t
- 10.1017/S0022381608080742 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00475.x · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01204.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022198294003 · DOI
- 10.2307/1598934 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · DOI · Paper page
- Stern P. C., 1999, Human Ecology Review, 6, 81
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00775.x · DOI
- Wardekker A., 2008, Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations, and perceptions, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 777
Crone, D. L., Bode, S., Murawski, C., & Laham, S. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190954 · Cited by 80
Motivation and climate change: A review
Brick, C., Bosshard, A., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.001 · Cited by 76
Persuading voters using human–artificial intelligence dialogues
Lin, H., Czarnek, G., Lewis, B., White, J. P., Berinsky, A. J., Costello, T. H., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09771-9 · Cited by 88
“the importance of personalizing persuasive messages to align with participants values, identity or personal disposition 35,44–46 , we did not find clear evidence of large returns to personalization.”
Challenging Moral Attitudes With Moral Messages
Luttrell, A., Philipp-Muller, A. Z., & Petty, R. E. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619854706 · Cited by 93
Cognitive dissonance, ego-involvement, and motivated reasoning
Carpenter, C. J. (2019) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2018.1564881 · Cited by 76
“Yet, in the original formulation of the theory, Festinger (1957) argued that exposure to messages inconsistent with one’s own beliefs could produce cognitive dissonance.”
BackgroundPearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P., & Romero‐Canyas, R. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616639726 · Cited by 112
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that liberals, but not conservatives, viewed environmental issues in moral terms, primarily informed by principles of harming versus caring for others—principles that climate organizations overwhelmingly use in their advocacy efforts (Nisbet, Markowitz, & Kotcher,…”
BackgroundHealth of People, Health of Planet and Our Responsibility: Climate Change, Air Pollution and Health
Al-Delaimy, W., Ramanathan, V., & Sorondo, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4 · Cited by 74
Tørstad, V. H., Sælen, H., & Bøyum, L. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab63e0 · Cited by 74
Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.013 · Cited by 81
Telkamp, J. B., & Anderson, M. H. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05057-6 · Cited by 89
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) found reframing pro-environmental issues as issues related to purity—rather than concerns of care and fairness— strengthened conservatives’ attitudes toward environmental issues.”
BackgroundFraming, the Media, and Environmental Communication
Nisbet, M. C., & Newman, T. P. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315887586.ch28 · Cited by 72
Sintov, N. D., Abou-Ghalioum, V., & White, L. V. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101576 · Cited by 80
Creative (Climate) Communications
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047 · Cited by 107
Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1819310116 · Cited by 81
“Adding to research in this area (29, 30, 34, 35), our data suggest that systems thinking may be one pathway to encourage conservatives and Republicans to adopt a more ecological worldview, which may then bolster acceptance and understanding of climate change.”
BackgroundHarm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
Schein, C., Ritter, R. S., & Gray, K. J. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000167 · Cited by 86
Motivation and climate change: A reviewPreprint
Brick, C., Bosshard, A., & Whitmarsh, L. E. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gcw9b · Cited by 2
The Impact of Political Ideology on Concern and Behavior During COVID-19Preprint
van Holm, E. V., Monaghan, J., Shahar, D. C., Messina, J., & Surprenant, C. W. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3573224 · Cited by 65
Walker, C., Stephenson, L. B., & Baxter, J. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.046 · Cited by 75
Local is not always better: the impact of climate information on values, behavior and policy support
Schoenefeld, J., & McCauley, M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-015-0288-y · Cited by 64
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that conservatives were more environmentally concerned when the issue was framed around purity and sanctity instead of the harm/care moral framing typically used when discussing environmental issues.”
BackgroundExtracting Latent Moral Information from Text Narratives: Relevance, Challenges, and Solutions
Weber, R., Mangus, J. M., Huskey, R., Hopp, F. R., Amir, O., Swanson, R., Gordon, A. S., Khooshabeh, P., Hahn, L., & Tamborini, R. (2018) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1447656 · Cited by 74
“Feinberg and Willer (2013, 2015)) have also shown that political messages are more persuasive when they are framed in terms of moral intuitions that align with the intuitions of the target population.”
BackgroundInfluentialXu, X., Arpan, L. M., & Chen, C. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.004 · Cited by 69
Moral Frames and Climate Change Policy Attitudes*
Severson, A. W., & Coleman, E. A. (2015) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12159 · Cited by 65
The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology
Gray, K. J., DiMaggio, N., Schein, C., & Kachanoff, F. J. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221124741 · Cited by 91
Lefsrud, L., Graves, H., & Phillips, N. (2020) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840619835575 · Cited by 60
Using Eco-Guilt to Motivate Environmental Behavior Change
Moore, M. M., & Yang, J. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1692889 · Cited by 60
Military Alliances and Public Support for War
Tomz, M., & Weeks, J. L. P. (2021) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqab015 · Cited by 59
Expanding the Foundation: Climate Change and Opportunities for Educational Research
Henderson, J. A., Long, D. E., Berger, P., Russell, C., & Drewes, A. (2017) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00131946.2017.1335640 · Cited by 59
“Another strategy involves focusing on the potential for benefit and opportunity under various climate scenarios (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundBrief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change
Schuldt, J. P., Pearson, A. R., Romero‐Canyas, R., & Larson-Konar, D. M. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1893-9 · Cited by 80
“For instance, our finding that the pope prime exerted a stronger effect on Republicans’ (vs. Democrats’) perceptions of climate change as a moral issue may reflect a stronger tendency for Democrats to view climate change in moral terms to begin with (see Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialIndividualism, Structuralism, and Climate Change
Brownstein, M., Kelly, D., & Madva, A. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1982745 · Cited by 77
What drives support for self-driving car technology in the United States?
Dixon, G., Hart, P. S., Clarke, C. E., O’Donnell, N. H., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1517384 · Cited by 64
Kotcher, J., Maibach, E. W., Montoro, M., & Hassol, S. J. (2018) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2018gh000154 · Cited by 72
Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy011 · Cited by 83
Catalyzing Public Engagement With Climate Change Through Informal Science Learning Centers
Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., Fraser, J., & Flinner, K. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017697980 · Cited by 81
“…it is possible that presenters might be able to achieve even greater success through slight program adjustments to better reach this audience’s “heads” and “hearts,” such as more effectively connecting presentations to political conservatives’ ideologies and values (e.g., Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundGreen as the gospel: The power of stewardship messages to improve climate change attitudes.
Shin, F., & Preston, J. L. (2019) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/rel0000249 · Cited by 85
“…a better chance of persuading and influencing people’s opinions (Markowitz & Shariff, 2015; Van Zant & Moore, 2015), and more specifically, framing climate change in terms of moral values can increase proenvironmental attitudes and behavior (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Wolsko, Ariceaga, Seiden, 2016).”
BackgroundHahnel, U. J. J., Arnold, O., Waschto, M., Korcaj, L., Hillmann, K., Roser, D., & Spada, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01392 · Cited by 70
“Previous research has shown that ecological motivation is grounded in moral aspirations (Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundEom, K., Saad, C. S., & Kim, H. S. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220948712 · Cited by 62
“Relatedly, Feinberg & Willer (2013) found that framing environmental issues in terms of purity, a moral value important among conservatives (a dimension correlated with religiosity), eliminated the difference in environmental attitudes between liberals and conservatives.4 Combined with these…”
BackgroundFrimer, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103906 · Cited by 64
Persuading republicans and democrats to comply with mask wearing: An intervention tournament
Gelfand, M. J., Ren, L., Stamkou, E., Pieper, D. J., Denison, E., Fernandez, J., Choi, V. K., Chatman, J. A., Jackson, J. C., & Dimant, E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104299 · Cited by 74
The political is personal: The costs of daily politics.Preprint
Ford, B., Feinberg, M., Thai, S., Gatchpazian, A., & Lassetter, B. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hdz97 · Cited by 54
“More abstractly, politics is often intrinsically linked to people ’ s core moral beliefs and convictions (e.g., polarizing “ culture war ” issues, like abortion and immigration; Feinberg & Willer, 2013, 2015; Graham et al., 2011; Haidt, 2012; Koleva et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMacFarlane, D., Hurlstone, M. J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112790 · Cited by 64
Sockhill, N. J., Dean, A. J., Oh, R. R. Y., & Fuller, R. A. (2022) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10400 · Cited by 74
Greens or space invaders: Prominent utopian themes and effects on social change motivation
Fernando, J. W., O’Brien, L. V., Burden, N. J., Judge, M., & Kashima, Y. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2607 · Cited by 67
Renaud, K., & Dupuis, M. (2019) · New Security Paradigms Workshop · doi:10.1145/3368860.3368864 · Cited by 58
“, climate change [48], reckless & drunk driving [101, 110] andHIV/AIDS [45, 120].”
BackgroundWetts, R. (2019) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soz027 · Cited by 51
“For instance, advocates of increased action against global warming might invoke values such as purity or loyalty more likely to resonate with conservatives (Feinberg and Willer 2013) or use “ climate brokers ” such as business leaders to speak to conservative audiences (Hoffman 2015).”
BackgroundThe Story of Two Big Chimneys: A Frame Analysis of Climate Change in US and Chinese Newspapers
Xie, L. (2015) · Journal of Intercultural Communication Research · doi:10.1080/17475759.2015.1011593 · Cited by 65
“The rise of the morality frame in the US newspapers echoes other findings that both secular and religious morality often appeared in recent climate change coverage in the US media (Hart & Feldman, 2014), in hopes of reducing polarization in public perception (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundMoral Utility Theory: Understanding the motivation to behave (un)ethically
Hirsh, J. B., Lu, J. G., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.002 · Cited by 67
“Ithas been shown, for example, that pro-environmental attitudes can be increased by framing the issue to be congruent with personal values (Baldwin & Lammers, 2016; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
Dimensions of social dominance and their associations with environmentalism
Stanley, S. K., Wilson, M. S., Sibley, C., & Milfont, T. L. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.051 · Cited by 50
Factors Affecting Green Purchase Intention: A Perspective of Ethical Decision Making
Tian, Z., Sun, X., Wang, J., Su, W., & Li, G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191811151 · Cited by 58
Anderson, S. E., Butler, D. M., & Harbridge‐Yong, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108768375 · Cited by 78
How Are Moral Foundations Associated with Climate-Friendly Consumption?
Vainio, A., & Mäkiniemi, J.-P. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9601-3 · Cited by 67
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that the use of Sanctity/degradation rhetoric in the communication of environmental issues was associated with increased pro-environmental attitudes among politically conservative individuals.”
InfluentialTäuber, S., van Zomeren, M., & Kutlaca, M. (2014) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1200-6 · Cited by 66
“The above research (Feinberg and Willer 2013; Kutlaca et al. 2013; Stern et al. 1999), however, also indicates that value-driven identities should be fostered carefully by considering the match of values with existing identities, so as not to polarize people who actually share the same convictions.”
BackgroundMaking Sense of the Senseless: Identity, Justice, and the Framing of Environmental Crises
Clayton, S., Koehn, A. J., & Grover, E. (2013) · Social justice research · doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0185-z · Cited by 49
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that the environment is an issue with more moral standing for liberals than for conservatives.”
Ecospirituality: The psychology of moral concern for nature
Billet, M. I., Baimel, A., Sahakari, S. S., Schaller, M., & Norenzayan, A. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102001 · Cited by 48
DiRusso, C., & Myrick, J. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1933120 · Cited by 47
“For instance, conservatives may be less likely than liberals to process environmental messages emotionally because they are less inclined to perceive environmental issues as moral issues, as liberals often do (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Psychology of Environmental Attitudes: Conceptual and Empirical Insights from New Zealand
Milfont, T. L. (2012) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0058 · Cited by 47
Reducing mask resistance among White evangelical Christians with value-consistent messages
DeMora, S. L., Merolla, J. L., Newman, B., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.2101723118 · Cited by 46
“Messages that align with an individual’s values are more likely to move attitudes toward positions an individual would not normally support (13, 14), although this outcome is not guaranteed (15).”
Dietsch, A. M., Wald, D. M., Stern, M. J., & Tully, B. (2021) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.421 · Cited by 50
Milfont, T. L., Davies, C., & Wilson, M. (2019) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.v14i2.32633 · Cited by 58
The Connection Between Moral Positions and Moral Arguments Drives Opinion Change
Strimling, P., Vartanova, I., Jansson, F., & Eriksson, K. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0647-x · Cited by 58
Unintended Effects of Emphasizing the Role of Climate Change in Recent Natural Disasters
Dixon, G., Bullock, O. M., & Adams, D. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1546202 · Cited by 57
The Problem with Morality: Impeding Progress and Increasing Divides
Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12045 · Cited by 62
“In this case, the argument grounded in social justice concerns was much more convincing to liberal participants, resulting in them being more supportive of military spending (see also Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Völkel & Feinberg, 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationXu, X., Soto, C. J., & Plaks, J. E. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12613 · Cited by 54
Generative Concern and Environmentalism
Jia, F., Alisat, S., Soucie, K. M., & Pratt, M. W. (2015) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/2167696815578338 · Cited by 60
“Environmental issues are indeed typically discussed in terms of harm- and care-based moral concerns (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundResultHindering Harm and Preserving Purity: How Can Moral Psychology Save the Planet?
Rottman, J., Kelemen, D. A., & Young, L. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12195 · Cited by 52
“Crucially, environmentally relevant behaviors may also be framed in terms of harm or purity (Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialDon't put all your eggs in one basket: Testing an integrative model of household food waste
Bretter, C., Unsworth, K. L., Russell, S. V., Quested, T. E., Doriza, A., & Kaptan, G. (2022) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106442 · Cited by 46
Conservatism predicts aversion to consequential Artificial Intelligence
Castelo, N., & Ward, A. F. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261467 · Cited by 51
“Given that this approach has been successful in increasing conservative support for typically liberal causes such as the Affordable Care Act and environmentally sustainable behaviors [35,43], it is perhaps surprising that it failed to shift conservative attitudes in this context.”
BackgroundMilesi, P., Süssenbach, P., Bohner, G., & Megías, J. L. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2622 · Cited by 59
Hong, H., & Kang, J. (2019) · Fashion and Textiles · doi:10.1186/s40691-019-0170-8 · Cited by 43
Böhm, G., & Pfister, H. (2015) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1118148 · Cited by 40
“It seems that environmental risks in particular are considered moral issues by many people (Böhm and Tanner 2013; Feinberg and Willer 2013; McDaniels, Axelrod, and Slovic 1995).”
BackgroundReligious Identity, Beliefs, and Views about Climate Change
Sachdeva, S. S. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.335 · Cited by 70
“Moral motivations, i.e. believing that nature is something that has to be prevented from harm, have gained traction in the field as efficacious pathways to environmental engagement (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Markowitz & Shariff, 2012).”
The intergroup foundations of climate change justice
Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217745366 · Cited by 62
“Framing can be broad to reach across audiences (e.g., Schultz & Zelezny, 2003; Swim et al., in press), or target specific audiences, for example, using moral principles endorsed by conservatives (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Wolsko, 2017).”
BackgroundTyler, T. (2017) · doi:10.18352/ulr.410 · Cited by 42
Why Do Conservatives Report Being Happier Than Liberals? The Contribution of Neuroticism
Burton, C. M., Plaks, J. E., & Peterson, J. B. (2015) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.117 · Cited by 94
“For example, Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that liberal-conservative differences in endorsement of pro-environmental policies were completely eliminated when conservative participants were presented with pro-environmental arguments that emphasized the disgusting aspects of pollution.”
BackgroundEllemers, N., & Chopova, T. (2021) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2022.100156 · Cited by 63
How are moral foundations associated with empathic traits and moral identity?
Dawson, K. J., Han, H., & Choi, Y. R. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02372-5 · Cited by 52
Using Frames to Make Scientific Communication More Effective
Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.38 · Cited by 34
Playing with Emotions: The Effect of Moral Appeals in Elite Rhetoric
Lipsitz, K. (2017) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9394-8 · Cited by 54
Kodapanakkal, R. I., Brandt, M., Kogler, C., & van Beest, I. (2022) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211040803 · Cited by 39
Maki, A., & Raimi, K. T. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.11.005 · Cited by 38
“…(Asensio & Delmas, 2015; Corner & Pidgeon, 2015; Stern & Raimi, 2015), appealing to people’s core moral and political values (Campbell & Kay, 2014; Feinberg & Willer, 2012), and making environmental issues personally relevant to people’s physical environment (Hart & Nisbet, 2012; McDonald, Chai,…”
BackgroundCrimston, C. R., Selvanathan, H. P., & Jetten, J. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12787 · Cited by 58
Zaikauskaitė, L., Chen, X., & Tsivrikos, D. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239707 · Cited by 44
DeGolia, A. H., Hiroyasu, E. H. T., & Anderson, S. E. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220320 · Cited by 46
“While some evidence suggests conservatives and Republicans are more responsive to gain-framed messages than to messages that focus on the risk of environmental loss due to inaction [48,51,69], we expect this is an artifact of backlash against partisan rhetoric rather than a natural predisposition to respond to gain fr…”
BackgroundRossen, I., Dunlop, P. D., & Lawrence, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.006 · Cited by 45
“Feinberg and Willer (2013) show that pro-environmental messages in the context of the U.”
BackgroundMansour, M., Aman, N., Al-Ghazali, B. M., & Shah, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967859 · Cited by 37
“Individual morality motivates individual interest and commitment to environmental issues, making moral reflectiveness a proximal motivating factor of pro-environmental conduct (Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundDotson, T. (2015) · Engaging Science Technology and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2015.009 · Cited by 38
“Others have found that describing environmental harm in terms of purity, a moral frame typically more salient to conservatives, rather than in terms of harm and care, tends to be helpful in reducing the gap between liberals and conservatives regarding environmental issues (Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
BackgroundPersonalizing Moral Reframing in Interpersonal Conversation: A Field Experiment
Kalla, J. L., Levine, A. S., & Broockman, D. E. (2022) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/716944 · Cited by 37
“For example, framing environmental conservation as about cleaning the environment may be more persuasive to those who value “purity/sanctity” (Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
BackgroundMittal, S., & Choudhury, M. D. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580834 · Cited by 40
“has additionally been applied to study political discourse in news media on Mosque construction controversies [13], environmental attitudes [35], and Oklahoma Sharia amendment campaign [14].”
BackgroundThreats to Science: Politicization, Misinformation, and Inequalities
Druckman, J. N. (2022) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162221095431 · Cited by 44
Moral values do not affect prosocial vaccination
Betsch, C., & Böhm, R. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0478-1 · Cited by 36
Designing better energy metrics for consumers
Larrick, R. P., Soll, J. B., & Keeney, R. L. (2015) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1353/bsp.2015.0005 · Cited by 33
The influence of message framing on public beliefs and behaviors related to species reintroduction
Niemiec, R. M., Sekar, S., Gonzalez, M. N., & Mertens, A. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108522 · Cited by 41
Dispute and morality in the perception of societal risks: extending the psychometric model
Bassarak, C., Pfister, H., & Böhm, G. (2015) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1043571 · Cited by 37
“Environmental risks, in particular, seem to be a moral issue for many people (Böhm and Tanner 2012; Feinberg and Willer 2013; McDaniels, Axelrod, and Slovic 1995).”
BackgroundMalka, A., Osborne, D., Soto, C. J., Greaves, L. M., Sibley, C. G., & Yphtach Lelkes, B. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216653936 · Cited by 44
Determining our destiny: Do restrictions to collective autonomy fuel collective action?
Kachanoff, F., Kteily, N. S., Khullar, T. H., Park, H. J., & Taylor, D. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ngvea · Cited by 34
Frimer, J. A., Tell, C. E., & Motyl, M. S. (2016) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12127 · Cited by 50
It is just wrong: Moral foundations and food waste
Bretter, C., Unsworth, K. L., Kaptan, G., & Russell, S. V. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102021 · Cited by 42
Gillis, A. J., Vandenbergh, M. P., Raimi, K. T., Maki, A., & Wallston, K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101947 · Cited by 44
Nielsen, K. S., & Hofmann, W. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101551 · Cited by 44
Smetana, M., & Vranka, M. A. (2020) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050629.2020.1848825 · Cited by 39
Geiger, N., Pasek, M. H., Gruszczynski, M., Ratcliff, N. J., & Weaver, K. S. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101524 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Feinberg, M., & Willer, R.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feinberg, Matthew
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-12-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2120107374
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17
- FWCI
- 81.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Keywords
- environmental attitudes, moralization, political ideology, moral foundations, purity, reframing, environmental discourse, public service announcements
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Morals, Persuasive Communication, Politics, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review