The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Abstract
Americans' attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals' and conservatives' environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [277]
Citations
Cites
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574
Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/714000580 · Cited by 432
Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x · Cited by 155
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Bazerman M. H., 1999, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 39
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00826.x · DOI
- Boote A. S., 1981, Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 29
- 10.1177/1368430208098783 · DOI
- 10.1080/10463280240000082 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797610391911 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01523.x · DOI
- 10.1162/0011526042365555 · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026611404336 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00132.x · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017423 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013916596281006 · DOI
- Lakoff G., 1996, Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t
- 10.1017/S0022381608080742 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00475.x · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01204.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022198294003 · DOI
- 10.2307/1598934 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · DOI · Paper page
- Stern P. C., 1999, Human Ecology Review, 6, 81
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00775.x · DOI
- Wardekker A., 2008, Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations, and perceptions, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 777
Using Moral Foundations to Assess Stereotypes: Americans’ Perceptions of Immigrants and Refugees
Hoewe, J., Panek, E. T., Peacock, C., Sherrill, L. A., & Wheeler, S. C. (2021) · Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies · doi:10.1080/15562948.2021.1949657 · Cited by 13
“Additionally, several studies found that presenting conservative or liberal voters with information that coincides with their moral foundations reinforces their support for conservative and liberal policies, respectively (Day et al., 2014; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundMoral foundations theory, political identity, and the depiction of morality in children’s movies
Gehman, R. M., Guglielmo, S., & Schwebel, D. C. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248928 · Cited by 12
“Furthermore, the fact that MFT accounts for moral depictions and preferences in children’s media adds to a growing body of research that MFT predicts moral judgments in naturalistic contexts, including people’s judgments about social justice protests [37], environmental protection [38], and decisions about whether to…”
BackgroundDominioni, G. (2020) · European Journal of Risk Regulation · doi:10.1017/err.2020.102 · Cited by 9
Piejka, A., & Okruszek, Ł. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3687 · Cited by 15
Strategies for Countering False Information and Beliefs about Climate Change
Garrett, R. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.388 · Cited by 11
“On this view, values and moral evaluations are expected to be powerful predictors of beliefs (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Leiserowitz, Maibach, Roser-Renouf, Smith, & Dawson, 2013; Liu & Ditto, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Propaganda Machine Behind the Controversy Over Climate Science
Maxwell, R., & Miller, T. (2016) · doi:10.1177/0002764215613405 · Cited by 9
Candela, A., & Mariotto, F. P. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662514548135 · Cited by 9
“The concept of framing has long been investigated and discussed by disciplines such as psychology (Feinberg and Willer, 2013; Nelson et al., 1997), sociology (e.g. Benford and Snow, 2000), political science (e.g. Chong and Druckman, 2007), and media science (e.g. Anderson, 2009).”
BackgroundGraham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., & Wojcik, S. (2021) · Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_303262 · Cited by 9
A registered report megastudy on the persuasiveness of the most-cited climate messages
Voelkel, J. G., Ashokkumar, A., Abeles, A. T., Crawford, J. T., Fuller, K., Redekopp, C., Bongiorno, R., Campbell, T. H., Ecker, U. K. H., Feinberg, M., et al. (2026) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02536-2 · Cited by 9
“Six selected messaging strategies described supporting climate change mitigation as consistent with moral values and ideologies, such as care and considerateness 18 , free market beliefs 19 , belief in a just world 11 , patriotism 13 , purity 12 and system preservation 20 .”
Self-citationWong, D. W. S., Zhang, F.-X., Siddiki, S. N., & Yang, C.-W. (2025) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103600 · Cited by 8
Lesage, K. C., Schweitzer, F., Palmié, M., Haon, C., & Misra, S. (2024) · The Journal of product innovation management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12761 · Cited by 8
“The more conservative people are, the more they tend to prioritize an economic perspective on environmental issues over the inherent value of environmental protection (Dunlap & McCright, 2008; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
Zhang, J.-W., Akhtar, M., Zhang, Y.-J., Tang, J., & Yang, Q. (2024) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2877 · Cited by 8
Lind, A. V., Morton, T. A., & Dalege, J. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102370 · Cited by 11
Mateer, T. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12659 · Cited by 8
DeMora, S. L., Merolla, J. L., Newman, B., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09912-2 · Cited by 13
“…frames emphasiz - ing values like patriotism, purity, and egalitarianism can shift policy opinions away from partisan positions in a small number of highly contentious domains like same-sex marriage (Feinberg & Willer, 2015 ) and the environment (Feinberg & Willer, 2013 ; Wolsko et al., 2016).”
Dissecting moral judgements: Using moral foundation theory to advance the contingency continuum
Xu, M., Cropp, F., & Cameron, G. T. (2023) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102370 · Cited by 9
Lalot, F., Büttner, C. M., Özkeçeci, H., & Abrams, D. (2022) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000342 · Cited by 9
“It might be that Pollution triggers concerns about the violation of purity and sanctity values, which are usually endorsed to a greater extent by right-wing individuals (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Moral Significance of Aesthetics in Nature Imagery
Kim, E., Lee, J., & Aribarg, A. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976221083543 · Cited by 11
Economic framing dominates climate policy reporting: a fifty-state analysis
Garth, A., & Roberts, J. T. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03371-6 · Cited by 11
“Political context and ideology can significantly affect the impact of frames related to climate change (Schuldt et al. 2011; Villar and Krosnick 2011; Feinberg and Willer 2013; Schuldt and Roh 2014; Zhou 2016; Carmichael et al. 2017).”
BackgroundProtecting the Planet or Destroying the Universe? Understanding Reactions to Space Mining
Hornsey, M. J., Fielding, K. S., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., Grice, T. A., & Chapman, C. M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14074119 · Cited by 12
“Furthermore, there is evidence that people with pro-environmental attitudes focus on individualizing foundations: for example, the bulk of newspaper op-eds and public service announcements designed to promote proenvironmental attitudes focus on individualizing dimensions [52].”
BackgroundHeddy, B. C., Lombardi, D., & Danielson, R. (2021) · The Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1080/20590776.2021.2011203 · Cited by 8
Threat Rejection Fuels Political Dehumanization
Kubin, E., Kachanoff, F., & Gray, K. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211068922 · Cited by 8
“For example, moral framing research (Feinberg & Willer, 2013, 2015; Kidwell et al., 2013) finds partisans are supportive of opponents’ policies when opponents acknowledge their own values.”
BackgroundAllard, T., & McFerran, B. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1270 · Cited by 16
van Vliet, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2021.699653 · Cited by 8
Who participates in energy activism? Profiling political engagement in the United States
Memmott, T., Carley, S. R., & Konisky, D. M. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102095 · Cited by 12
Religious Elite Cues, Internal Division, and the Impact of Pope Francis' Laudato Si'
Buckley, D. T. (2020) · Politics and Religion · doi:10.1017/s175504832000067x · Cited by 8
Morality and Perception of Corruption
Leite, R. D. O., Dias, R. S., & Mendes, L. (2020) · Latin American Business Review · doi:10.1080/10978526.2020.1777558 · Cited by 11
Testing the Influence of Purity-Based Interventions on Pro-environmental Behavior
Sachdeva, S. S., Boghrati, R., & Dehghani, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11061811 · Cited by 8
“, more disgust-inducing images, than harm-based ones [20].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPsychology and the deterrence of corporate crime
Tyler, T. R. (2018) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781783474479.00008 · Cited by 9
Arpan, L. M., Barooah, P., & Subramany, R. (2015) · Applied Environmental Education & Communication · doi:10.1080/1533015x.2015.1006740 · Cited by 8
“For example, some may see energy saving as a moral action because it protects resources for their progeny or preserves the purity of their personal, immediate surroundings (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Nisbet, 2009).”
BackgroundCrabtree, C. D., Holbein, J. B., Bosley, M., & Sevi, S. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag066 · Cited by 10
“Drawing on insights from narrative persuasion and moral reframing (2 – 5), deep canvassing encourages participants to reflect on personal experiences and core values, often leading to durable attitude change.”
Ideological underpinnings of climate change beliefs: A 13-year longitudinal study
Milfont, T. L., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102554 · Cited by 6
Ahonen, S., Leino, M., & Tiihonen, A. (2025) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-025-03859-x · Cited by 10
“Prior studies have demonstrated how frames can gain more influence when they reso - nate with the pre-existing beliefs and attitudes of respondents (Gainous and Merry 2021; Feinberg and Willer 2013 ; Jones 2014 ; Howel et al. 2016 ).”
Wang, B., Waygood, E. O. D., Ji, X., Javadian, M. A., Pan, L., & Feinberg, M. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.026 · Cited by 9
Self-citationMoving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack
Joachim, M., Castelló, I., & Parry, G. (2024) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503241281632 · Cited by 7
“The role of emotions in organizational legitimacy has attracted scholarly attention (Scott, 2008; Voronov & Vince, 2012), as emotions shape social judgments (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Hart & Nisbet, 2012).”
Green and Good? Examining Intended and Unintended Effects of Morally Framed Climate Messages
Troy, C. L. C., Eng, N., & Skurka, C. (2024) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2024.2379445 · Cited by 7
“Many extant studies focus on intended persuasive outcomes of moral framing (e.g. Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Luttrell & Trentadue, 2023; Hurst & Stern, 2020; Wolsko et al., 2016).”
InfluentialMoral or Lawful? When Legal Constraints Reverse the Motivational Benefits of Moral Considerations
Kundro, T., Croitoru, N. L., & Helgason, B. A. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.17545 · Cited by 7
Moral framing and referendum politics: Navigating the empathy battlefield
Atikcan, E. O., & Hand, K. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12921 · Cited by 7
The Moral Foundations of Vaccine Passports
Harjani, T., He, H., & Chao, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05427-8 · Cited by 7
“…usefulness in understanding divergent attitudes towards same-sex marriage, abortion, torture, pro-environmental attitudes (Dick-inson et al., 2016; Feinberg & Willer, 2013); immigration (Baldner & Pierro, 2019; Chung et al., 2016; Grover et al., 2019), pro-social behaviour (Jancenelle et al.,…”
What's in a Norm? Centering the Study of Moral Values in Scholarship on Norm Interactions
Quissell, K. (2022) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viac049 · Cited by 12
Pasaribu, D., Takwin, B., & Martens, P. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271515 · Cited by 7
“Feinberg & Willer [30] argues that presenting conservatives with pro-environmental messages couched within a set of particularly conservative moral domain, leads conservatives to adopt more pro-environmental attitudes, comparable to those of liberals.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlfirević, N., Petković, S., & Radaković, M. Z. (2022) · Revija za Socijalnu Politiku · doi:10.3935/rsp.v29i1.1857 · Cited by 7
“Thus, individuals are limited in their moral reasoning to the sustainability issues and might rely on social ideologies (such as liberalism/conservativism) in their pro-environmental decision-making, as shown by Feinberg & Willer (2013).”
BackgroundDumitrescu, D., & Bucy, E. (2021) · International journal of public opinion research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edab016 · Cited by 7
Dong, M.-C., van Prooijen, J., & van Lange, P. (2021) · Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/jts5.113/v2/decision1 · Cited by 7
Conceptualizing Agency and Agents in Earth System Governance
Scobie, M., Benney, T. M., Brown, C., & Widerberg, O. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688277.002 · Cited by 10
Dixon, A., & Robertson, K. (2019) · Creative (Climate) Communications · doi:10.1016/s0262-4079(06)61339-0 · Cited by 7
Wang, X. (2017) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edx001 · Cited by 11
O’Sullivan, T. M., & Emmelhainz, R. (2014) · Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management · doi:10.1515/jhsem-2013-0117 · Cited by 8
Moral Foundations Theory: Building Value Through Moral Pluralism
Koleva, S. P., Beall, E., & Graham, J. (2017) · International handbooks in business ethics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6510-8_79 · Cited by 8
“, 2012), and morality-based persuasive appeals (Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
Beyond Human Judgment: A Bayesian Evaluation of LLMs' Moral Values Understanding
Skorski, M., & Landowska, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Uncertainty-Aware NLP (UncertaiNLP 2025) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.uncertainlp-main.3 · Cited by 6
“These foundations shape individual and collective decision-making, from political preferences to social behavior (Feinberg and Willer, 2013; Graham et al., 2009; Nguyen et al., 2022; Roy and Gold-wasser, 2021), making their computational detection crucial for understanding discourse dynamics and…”
Mukaromah, N., Suadi, S., & Maso, W. (2025) · Bidayatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Mandrasah Ibtidaiyah · doi:10.54471/bidayatuna.v8i1.3514 · Cited by 6
“Accordingly, fostering environmental care character in students becomes a vital step toward nurturing future generations capable of addressing environmental issues ethically and sustainably (Dsouza & Padmanabha, 2024; Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
The sociomoral construction of the dairy industry on social media
Gilbert, I., Poole, R., & Niemi, L. (2024) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2024.2319760 · Cited by 6
“For instance, Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that pro-environmental attitudes can be fostered in conservatives by framing ecological crises using the moral foundation of purity instead of harm or fairness-based framings, showing that different moral values matter for different audiences.”
Stagnaro, M. N., Pink, S. L., Rand, D. G., & Willer, R. (2023) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-128 · Cited by 6
“…to report higher levels of support for a number of political positions, such as environmental protection/climate change (Bayes et al., 2020; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Wolsko et al., 2016), same-sex marriage (Feinberg & Willer, 2015), immigration (Voelkel et al., 2022), making English the…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSelf-Disclosure and Respect: Understanding the Engagement of Value Minorities
Dumas, T. L., Doyle, S., & Lount, R. B. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.15768 · Cited by 6
Inter‐attitude centrality does not appear to reduce persuasion for political attitudes
Brandt, M. J., & Vallabha, S. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2980 · Cited by 7
From controversy to common ground
Litofcenko, J., Vogler, A., Meyer, M., & Mehrwald, M. (2023) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.22124.lit · Cited by 6
The Power of Moral Words in Politicized Climate Change Communication
Kim, J., Lee, S., Wang, Y., & Leach, J. (2023) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2023.2227771 · Cited by 6
Yang, L. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136677 · Cited by 6
Environmental attitudes of Chinese students in higher education institutions
Yue, X.-Y., Wanglee, W., Yin, Y., Ye, Y., & Cai, T. (2023) · Journal of Education and e-Learning Research · doi:10.20448/jeelr.v10i2.4491 · Cited by 6
“Conservatives face policies intended to preserve the environment and liberals position themselves as guardians of the climate (Feinberg & Willer, 2012).”
BackgroundPolarization and Persuasion: Engaging Sociology in the Moral Universe of a Divided Democracy
Downey, D. J. (2022) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/07311214221124443 · Cited by 7
“Anything that looks like smoking is bad”: Moral opposition and support for harm reduction policy
Wylie, J., Sharma, N., & Gantman, A. P. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104343 · Cited by 7
Peran Sekolah dalam Upaya Pelestarian Greend Child Sebagai Upaya Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup
Akbar, A., & Ali, A. M. (2021) · Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton · doi:10.35326/pencerah.v7i3.1181 · Cited by 6
The Performance of Agency in Earth System Governance
Betsill, M. M., & Milkoreit, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108688277.006 · Cited by 6
Deontic authority in intervention discourse: Insights from bystander intervention
Ran, Y., & Huang, X. (2019) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445619846705 · Cited by 9
“However, in the case of immoralities, bystanders who are well aware of a wrongdoer’s immorality don’t necessarily wield the deontic authority to intervene for various reasons, such as a reluctance to challenge the conventional norms of getting along with others (Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundO CORPO E A ADOÇÃO DE PRÁTICAS SUSTENTÁVEIS: ESTUDO DE CASO EM UMA ECOVILA
Roysen, R. (2018) · Psicologia & Sociedade · doi:10.1590/1807-0310/2018v30164236 · Cited by 6
Reactions to “patriotic” and “protest” songs in individuals differing in political orientation
Ziv, N. (2018) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735617713119 · Cited by 6
Zhang, L., Tenkasi, R. V., Guo, Q., & Zhang, J. (2016) · Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1063/1.4966911 · Cited by 6
Borau, S., & Mai, R. (2025) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-025-01116-2 · Cited by 5
Cognitive bias in perceived concern with rainfall: Implications for climate adaptation
Skog, E., Sandlund, I., & Sörqvist, P. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102737 · Cited by 5
“These halo effects likely stem from the moral value often ascribed to pro-environmental behavior (e.g., Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Gholamza-dehmir, Sparks, & Farsides, 2019).”
Song, Y.-Y., Schuldt, J. P., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Yuan, Y., Zou, S., & Li, J. (2025) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-025-03898-4 · Cited by 5
“On the issue of climate change specifically, moralization is arguably a cause for the wide - spread political polarization (Feinberg and Willer 2013).”
Suh, Y. J., & Kim, H. S. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241263941 · Cited by 7
“…messages, including single sentences advocating policy positions (Day et al., 2014), newspaper op-eds encouraging pro-environ-mental behaviors (Feinberg & Willer, 2013), transcripts of presidential speeches (Miles, 2016), messages recommending mask-wearing in public during the COVID-19…”
CEO moral foundations and firms’ environmental, social, and governance performance
Ng, E., Phang, R., & Kang, E. (2024) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/14761270241265553 · Cited by 6
“Yet, existing ESG narratives largely leverage harm-and justice-based moral arguments (i.e., based on individuals’ needs) to appeal for corporate action (Feinberg and Willer, 2013).”
InfluentialMorality of vaccination: the influence of moral conviction on vaccination decisions
Aignesberger, V., & Greitemeyer, T. (2023) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2023.2285750 · Cited by 5
“Polarization and conflicts with dissenters emerged as possible consequences (Ditto & Koleva, 2011; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Greitemeyer, 2023).”
Moral foundations and future pro‐environmental lifestyles choices in the Finnish population
Silfver, M., Niva, M., Salmivaara, L., & Vainio, A. (2023) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.2687 · Cited by 5
Mortoja, M. G., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106350 · Cited by 5
Passafaro, P., & Vecchione, M. (2022) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101038 · Cited by 5
Andrade, E., Seoane, G., Velay, L., & Sabucedo, J.-M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18094438 · Cited by 5
“From a theoretical perspective, they agree with the traditional association between conservative ideology and dominance over the environment [35], which seem to condition people’s decisions in essential aspects such as energy consumption [36], as well as for those who have explanatory hypotheses such as those connecti…”
BackgroundKlebig, B., Hahn, L., Tamborini, R., Aley, M. R., Goble, H., & Baldwin, J. A. (2021) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934215.2020.1869281 · Cited by 8
“For example, Feinberg and Willer (2013) found that only liberals considered recycling a moral issue, while Haidt and Hersh (2001) found that only conservatives perceived gay marriage to be a moral issue. In related work, research on terrorist groups provided evidence suggesting that left-wing terrorist groups’ activit…”
BackgroundLu, H. (2020) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2019.1582313 · Cited by 5
“Therefore, messages promoting environmental protection, especially ones framed in terms of harm and care, may be perceived as pro-attitudinal to liberals and counter-attitudinal to conservatives (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundForster, H. A., Kunreuther, H. C., & Weber, E. U. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101938 · Cited by 8
The Maui's Dolphin Challenge: Lessons From a School-Based Litter Reduction Project
Townrow, C. S., Laurence, N., Blythe, C., Long, J., & Harré, N. (2016) · Australian Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1017/aee.2016.27 · Cited by 5
Isler, O., Yılmaz, O., & Doğruyol, B. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104050 · Cited by 5
Developing a Climate Literacy Framework for Upper Secondary Students
Harker-Schuch, I., & Watson, M. (2019) · Climate change management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32898-6_17 · Cited by 14
Framing Moral Evaluations: Moral Foundations in U.S. Newspaper Coverage of Mosque Controversies
Bowe, B. (2014) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · doi:10.25710/1q2y-x302 · Cited by 5
“For example, liberals tend to look at the environment as an issue of morality based on the care/harm moral foundation (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
BackgroundDoganoglu, T., Grzybowski, L., & Rachubik, J. (2026) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108876 · Cited by 4
Goldwert, D., Constantino, S. M., Patel, Y., Sabherwal, A. C., Semken, C., Brick, C., Castiglione, A., Debnath, R., Doell, K. C., Dubey, R., et al. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf400 · Cited by 7
“This finding advances previous research suggesting that appealing to moral obligations can influence climate beliefs (30).”
Self-citationRüger, T., Mücksch, J., & Siems, F. (2025) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-025-00411-1 · Cited by 7
“For example, Feinberg and Willer (2013) point out that conservatives’ attitudes towards the environment could be changed by strengthening the purity foundation in the message.”
InfluentialWickenkamp, A., Hopp, F. R., Hameleers, M., & Bos, L. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251357271 · Cited by 3
“Messages aligned with moral foundations resonate through heuristic processing, shaping attitudes and behaviors (Feinberg & Willer, 2012).”
Jayasinghe, N., & Smiley, K. T. (2025) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2025.2514431 · Cited by 3
“Similarly, theories on the value basis of environmental attitudes argue that individuals consider the costs of their actions on the environment when forming views (Feinberg and Willer 2013; Milfont and Gouveia 2006; Stern and Dietz 1994)).”
Catena‐Fernández, C., & Fernández, S. (2025) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302251330990 · Cited by 7
“This can be achieved by encouraging rightists to focus on other domains of the moral self that resonate with conservative values and align with environmental issues (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2025) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.70058 · Cited by 4
Hirschhäuser, V., & Winter, S. (2024) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2024.2415019 · Cited by 5
“Processes of attitude formation in social media are particularly relevant with regard to moral and societal debates when people are confronted with messages using morally framed arguments (Feinberg & Willer, 2013).”
Isiminger, A., & Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2024) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.13053 · Cited by 4
Crimston, C. R., Jetten, J., & Selvanathan, H. P. (2024) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231223896 · Cited by 5
“…the current findings highlight the potential dangers of the amplification of divisive, moralised, aggressive, and existential rhetoric that has become part and parcel of political campaigns in polarised societies (Brady et al., 2019; Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Haslam et al., 2022; McWhorter, 2019).”
Hundemer, S., Monroe, M. C., & Adams, D. C. (2023) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130379 · Cited by 4
Lammers, J., Schulte, A., & Baldwin, M. W. (2023) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12362 · Cited by 9
Evil Voices in Popular Fictions: The Case ofThe Exorcist
Kjeldgaard‐Christiansen, J., Hejná, M., Clasen, M., & Eaton, M. (2023) · The Journal of Popular Culture · doi:10.1111/jpcu.13234 · Cited by 4
Ulmke, N., Klackl, J., Hansen, J., Lempe, P., Finsterwalder, V., Hagedorn, L., Rosenzweig, T., Ramstetter, L., Fowles, T., & Jonas, E. (2023) · PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/21711976.2023.2204728 · Cited by 4
Davison, S., White, M., Pahl, S., Taylor, T., Borja, Á., McMeel, O., Kellett, P., Roberts, B., & Fleming, L. E. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.949263 · Cited by 4
“This information could be important in identifying which groups in society tend to have greater or lesser concern, which in turn may aid targeted communication efforts (Feinberg and Willer, 2013; Wolsko et al., 2016; Whitmarsh and Corner, 2017).”
BackgroundDePalma, V. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2097904 · Cited by 4
“Employing the appropriate frames in these environmental messages eliminated the gap between conservative and liberal attitudes and in effect created a more unified perspective on a traditionally “liberal” issue (Feinberg & Willer, 2013; Wolsko et al., 2016).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Feinberg, M., & Willer, R.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feinberg, Matthew
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-12-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2120107374
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17
- FWCI
- 81.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Keywords
- environmental attitudes, moralization, political ideology, moral foundations, purity, reframing, environmental discourse, public service announcements
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Media, Morals, Persuasive Communication, Politics, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review