The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science
Abstract
Although nearly all domain experts agree that carbon dioxide emissions are altering the world’s climate, segments of the public remain unconvinced by the scientific evidence. Internet blogs have become a platform for denial of climate change, and bloggers have taken a prominent role in questioning climate science. We report a survey of climate-blog visitors to identify the variables underlying acceptance and rejection of climate science. Our findings parallel those of previous work and show that endorsement of free-market economics predicted rejection of climate science. Endorsement of free markets also predicted the rejection of other established scientific findings, such as the facts that HIV causes AIDS and that smoking causes lung cancer. We additionally show that, above and beyond endorsement of free markets, endorsement of a cluster of conspiracy theories (e.g., that the Federal Bureau of Investigation killed Martin Luther King, Jr.) predicted rejection of climate science as well as other scientific findings. Our results provide empirical support for previous suggestions that conspiratorial thinking contributes to the rejection of science. Acceptance of science, by contrast, was strongly associated with the perception of a consensus among scientists.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A related property of conspiracy theories is that they can protect cherished beliefs (e.g., vaccination is harmful; climate change is not a serious concern) by casting overwhelmingly disconfirmatory evidence (e.g., scientific findings) as the product of a conspiracy (Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, 2013).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, 2013
In the citing paper
“because beliefs in conspiracy theories in general are associated with a mistrust of scientific claims [16]”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Among visitors to climate blogs, the tendency to endorse conspiracy theories has been shown to be correlated with the rejection of climate science as well as the rejection of other scientific propositions [27].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“the data provide further evidence for the link between the rejection of science and a conspiratorial cognitive style in general”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“A further 3 items queried scientific propositions that were also used in previous research [27], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“the present study and related precedents [2]–[7], [18]–[21], [27] have identified worldviews and conspiracist ideation as two vehicles with which such motivated reasoning is exercised.”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The potential predictor constructs were all based on established instruments that have been repeatedly used in previous research”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Self-citationMcCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y · Cited by 1,221
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,217
Goertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 3×
“, or that the Air Force is hiding evidence of extraterrestrial visitors (Goertzel, 1994; Swami, ChamorroPremuzic, & Furnham, 2009).”
BackgroundConspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x · Cited by 1,050 · cited 4×
“Conspiracist ideation is, by definition, difficult to correct because any evidence contrary to the conspiracy is itself considered evidence of its existence (Bale, 2007; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialDefeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement's Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · Cited by 904
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Inhofe J., 2012, The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future
- Oreskes N., 2010, Merchants of doubt
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 639
It’s Not You, It’s Me … Well It’s Actually Us
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.006
Huxster, J. K., Slater, M. H., & Landrum, A. R. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211016411
Academic Climate Advocacy and Activism
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.007
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.003
Evans, A. C. (2018) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3wd3qh51
Keener, R. W. (2019) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.009
The measurement and prediction of conspiracy beliefs
Rose, C. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17060408.v1 · Cited by 3
de Mangin, C. C., & Gousse-Lessard, A.-S. (2022) · Éducation relative à l environnement · doi:10.4000/ere.8307 · Cited by 4
Acceptance and Support of the Australian Carbon Policy
Dreyer, S. J., & Walker, I. (2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e601982013-001
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-001
An Ecology of Knowledges: References
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-016
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-152
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-92
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-011
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.012
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.008
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.011
The Many Worlds of the Maya Biosphere Reserve
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-002
Galdón, A. (2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-004
Fire at the Edge of the Forest
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-009
Peteneros and Other Endemic Species
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-116
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-10
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-013
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-57
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-006
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-265
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-012
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-005
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-008
Boykoff, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164047.010
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-245 · Cited by 25
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-216
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-014
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-32
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-185
The antidepressant hoax: Conspiracy theories decrease health-seeking intentionsPreprint
Natoli, E., & Marques, M. D. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8aedm · Cited by 1
An Ecology of Knowledges: Notes
(2020) · An Ecology of Knowledges · doi:10.1215/9781478007524-015
Bartolo, C. A. D., & Braun, M. K. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49547-7_6
Kleber, A., & Richter‐Krautz, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-64548-2_3
Kleber, A., & Richter‐Krautz, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-64548-2_1
Tudományszkepszis: nem az ostoba emberek ópiuma • Science Skepticism: Not the Opium of Dump People
Krekó, P. (2022) · Magyar Tudomány · doi:10.1556/2065.183.2022.8.7
Ochieng, O. E. (2022) · Journal of Policy and Development Studies (JPDS) · doi:10.51317/jpds.v4i1.255
Цифровая утопия: труд в эпоху искусственного интеллекта
Мартыненко, Т. С. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-129-140
King, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-141-146
Contagious conspiracy theories and potential pathways to address them
Cookson, D. (2020) · PsyPag Quarterly · doi:10.53841/bpspag.2020.1.115.17
Populists are skeptical to expert advice but respond to better argumentsPreprint
Peresman, A., Larsen, L. T., Mazepus, H., & Petersen, M. B. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/g4wm2
Tvinnereim, E. M., Andersen, G., Böhm, G., & Nordø, Å. D. (2023) · Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies · doi:10.15845/bells.v13i1.3855
Religiosity, conservatism, and value preferences as predictors of attitudes towards science
Zajas, A. (2023) · Zarządzanie Publiczne · doi:10.4467/20843968zp.21.012.17874
The Combination of Two Conspiracy-Belief-Scales and a correlational analysis with Epistemic BeliefsPreprint
Hollitzer, P., Daseking, M., & Ibrahim, F. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3924306/v1
الإيمان بنظريات المؤامرة: المبادئ الأساسية لمجال بحثي مستجد
جان, و. ف. ب., & دوغلاس, م. د. ك. م. (2023) · The Egyptian Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.21608/ejsbs.2023.347131
Hughes, D. A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41850-1_6
Origin Story Part II: Change in Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0006
Anti-Intellectualism and Its Pernicious Policy Consequences
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0008 · Cited by 1
The Prevalence of Anti-Intellectual Attitudes
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0004
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0003
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0009
The Bidirectionality Thesis: Hofstadter’s Forgotten Prediction
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0007
Origin Story Part I: Explaining Between-Person Differences in Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0005
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.005.0001
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0001
The Nature and Origins of Anti-Intellectualism
Motta, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.003.0002
Zagarella, R. M., & Annoni, M. (2024) · Argumentation et analyse du discours · doi:10.4000/12hvp
Zagarella, R. M., & Annoni, M. (2024) · Argumentation et analyse du discours · doi:10.4000/12hvo
anon, M., & Yasseri, T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5030603
Lee, A., Sheppard, M., Naughtin, C. K., Rebuli, M., & Brindal, E. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251324763
Barros, C. E. (2025) · Cadernos de Astronomia · doi:10.47456/cad.astro.v6n1.47434
Demographic Attributes and Attitudes of COVID-19-skeptics in Russia
Соколов, Б. О., Afanasyeva, Y. A., & Zavadskaya, M. (2025) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2025.2519019
Conspiracy Theory Theory: A Disordered Nomological NetworkPreprint
Buckingham, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5365150
The Climate Impact of Misinformation, Disinformation, and Greenwashing in Advertising
Tinger, M., Walton, S. C., & O'Kane, P. M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86536-7_4
There’s a psychological link between conspiracy theories and creationism
Lewandowsky, S. (2018) · The Conversation · doi:10.64628/ab.7et6aqvjf
Self-citationVoinarovska, L., Kozlov, Y., Kruhliak, M., & Pityakova, T. (2025) · Epistemological Studies in Philosophy Social and Political Sciences · doi:10.15421/342504
From denial to disinformation and delay
Roy, S., & Hoffman, A. J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198953067.003.0010
Associative Learning in a Conspiratorial Frame
Kelly, T., Hattersley, M., & Ludvig, E. A. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251396472
de Zavala, A. G. (2025) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2025.10.001
Rapp, D. N., Imundo, M. N., & Adler, R. M. (2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64113-853-620251008
Mohamed, A. E. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3341797
Adaptation of the AI-Related Conspiracy Beliefs Scale for Use in Turkey
Turgut, D., Kunuroglu, F., & van Prooijen, J. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2611144
Climate Change, Disinformation, and the Humanities‑Based Inoculation Against Zombie Ideas
Torcello, L. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80592-703-720261006
Petrović, M. B., Branković, M., Damnjanović, M., Draginić, K., Sullman, M. J. M., & Žeželj, I. L. (2026) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70050
Lay Attributions of Conspiracy Beliefs Predict Intentions to Correct Conspiracy Believers
Mang, V., Epstude, K., & Fennis, B. M. (2026) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672261418068
Making Sense of Science Denialism
Billon, A. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2625257
Partisan Differences in Risk‐Taking in a Simulated Pandemic
Woike, J. K., Hafenbrädl, S., Kanngießer, P., & Hertwig, R. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.70066
Comment on raisonne sur les explications : philosophie et psychologie du raisonnement explicatif
Mirabile, P. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/daef9c74z4dd4z4152za292zeb013ca8b625
Wischerath, D., Piwek, L., Roscoe, J. F., & Davidson, B. I. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70137
Arlt, D., & Schumann, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1782842
Polarization in Social Media: An Emotion-Symbolic Work Perspective
Castelló, I., Barbera‐Tomás, D., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12670-2_14
COVID-19 Pandemisine Yönelik Komplo Teorilerinin Bireylerin Aşı Niyetine Etkisi
Balçık, S. M., Varol, E., & Taşbaş, E. H. O. (2026) · İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.17336/igusbd.1606645
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0009
Topic Modeling and Word Embedding
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.005.0001
Linguistic Patterns in Online Conspiracy Theory
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0001
Opportunities for Future Research
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0010
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0005
From Mindsets and Algorithms to a Cultural Toolkit
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0004
Why Do Online Conspiracy Theories Matter?
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0002
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03-26
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 622-633
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2148186201
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f3ad951efb5618f5b793f160714014645166e35
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 118.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- climate change denial, conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, free market ideology, public acceptance of science, HIV/AIDS, smoking and lung cancer
- MeSH terms
- Denial, Psychological, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fraud, Humans, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Science, Space Flight, United States, Moon, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Climatic Processes, Blogging, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
