The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science
Abstract
Although nearly all domain experts agree that carbon dioxide emissions are altering the world’s climate, segments of the public remain unconvinced by the scientific evidence. Internet blogs have become a platform for denial of climate change, and bloggers have taken a prominent role in questioning climate science. We report a survey of climate-blog visitors to identify the variables underlying acceptance and rejection of climate science. Our findings parallel those of previous work and show that endorsement of free-market economics predicted rejection of climate science. Endorsement of free markets also predicted the rejection of other established scientific findings, such as the facts that HIV causes AIDS and that smoking causes lung cancer. We additionally show that, above and beyond endorsement of free markets, endorsement of a cluster of conspiracy theories (e.g., that the Federal Bureau of Investigation killed Martin Luther King, Jr.) predicted rejection of climate science as well as other scientific findings. Our results provide empirical support for previous suggestions that conspiratorial thinking contributes to the rejection of science. Acceptance of science, by contrast, was strongly associated with the perception of a consensus among scientists.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A related property of conspiracy theories is that they can protect cherished beliefs (e.g., vaccination is harmful; climate change is not a serious concern) by casting overwhelmingly disconfirmatory evidence (e.g., scientific findings) as the product of a conspiracy (Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, 2013).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, 2013
In the citing paper
“because beliefs in conspiracy theories in general are associated with a mistrust of scientific claims [16]”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Among visitors to climate blogs, the tendency to endorse conspiracy theories has been shown to be correlated with the rejection of climate science as well as the rejection of other scientific propositions [27].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“the data provide further evidence for the link between the rejection of science and a conspiratorial cognitive style in general”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“A further 3 items queried scientific propositions that were also used in previous research [27], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“the present study and related precedents [2]–[7], [18]–[21], [27] have identified worldviews and conspiracist ideation as two vehicles with which such motivated reasoning is exercised.”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The potential predictor constructs were all based on established instruments that have been repeatedly used in previous research”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Self-citationMcCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y · Cited by 1,221
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,217
Goertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 3×
“, or that the Air Force is hiding evidence of extraterrestrial visitors (Goertzel, 1994; Swami, ChamorroPremuzic, & Furnham, 2009).”
BackgroundConspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x · Cited by 1,050 · cited 4×
“Conspiracist ideation is, by definition, difficult to correct because any evidence contrary to the conspiracy is itself considered evidence of its existence (Bale, 2007; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialDefeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement's Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · Cited by 904
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Inhofe J., 2012, The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future
- Oreskes N., 2010, Merchants of doubt
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 639
Labeling opinions in the climate debate: a critical review
Howarth, C., & Sharman, A. (2015) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.332 · Cited by 47
Does deliberation decrease belief in conspiracies?Preprint
Bagó, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104395 · Cited by 52
Belief in conspiracy theories and non-normative behavior
Pummerer, L. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101394 · Cited by 46
Dreyer, S. J., Teisl, M. F., & McCoy, S. K. (2015) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.06.002 · Cited by 46
Tella, R. D., & Rotemberg, J. J. (2018) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2018.03.001 · Cited by 50
Chayinska, M., & Minescu, A. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2511 · Cited by 38
Propagation From Deceptive News Sources Who Shares, How Much, How Evenly, and How Quickly?
Glenski, M., Weninger, T., & Volkova, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2018.2881071 · Cited by 57
Urman, A., Makhortykh, M., Ulloa, R., & Kulshrestha, J. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101860 · Cited by 53
Climate skepticism decreases when the planet gets hotter and conservative support wanes
Hornsey, M. J., Chapman, C. M., & Humphrey, J. (2022) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102492 · Cited by 48
Torcello, L. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12179 · Cited by 49
Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism
Cíbik, M., & Hardoš, P. (2020) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/1474885119899232 · Cited by 42
The antidepressant hoax: Conspiracy theories decrease health‐seeking intentions
Natoli, E., & Marques, M. D. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12426 · Cited by 50
Conspiracy theories and climate change: A systematic review
Tam, K., & Chan, H. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102129 · Cited by 59
Online climate change polarization: Interactional framing analysis of climate change blog comments
van Eck, C. W., Mulder, B. C., & Dewulf, A. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020942228 · Cited by 52
Rossen, I., Dunlop, P. D., & Lawrence, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.006 · Cited by 45
A darkening spring: How preexisting distrust shaped COVID-19 skepticism
Priniski, J. H., & Holyoak, K. J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263191 · Cited by 43
The generic conspiracist beliefs scale – 5: A short-form measure of conspiracist ideation
Kay, C. S., & Slovic, P. (2022) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104315 · Cited by 43
Extreme Overvalued Beliefs: How Violent Extremist Beliefs Become “Normalized”
Rahman, T., & Mukherji, E. (2018) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs8010010 · Cited by 39
The signaling function of sharing fake stories
Ganapini, M. B. (2021) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12373 · Cited by 37
Toivonen, H. K. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01111-w · Cited by 42
Mayer, A., & Smith, E. K. (2016) · Social Currents · doi:10.1177/2329496516670185 · Cited by 37
Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophisticationPreprint
Pennycook, G., Bagó, B., & McPhetres, J. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ad9v7 · Cited by 37
Uscinski, J. E. (2014) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/17.04.pr0.115c19z2 · Cited by 2
Just Dead, Not Alive: Reconsidering Belief in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories
van Prooijen, J., Wahring, I. V., Mausolf, L., Mulas, N., & Shwan, S. (2023) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976231158570 · Cited by 36
Making an impression: The effects of sharing conspiracy theories
Green, R., Toribio‐Flórez, D., Douglas, K. M., Brunkow, J. W., & Sutton, R. M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104398 · Cited by 40
Generalized Dispositional Distrust as the Common Core of Populism and Conspiracy Mentality
Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12886 · Cited by 37
Lewandowsky, S., Ballard, T., & Pancost, R. D. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0462 · Cited by 37
Self-citationConspiracist cognition: chaos, convenience, and cause for concern
Lewandowsky, S. (2021) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2021.1886423 · Cited by 32
Self-citationConspiracy theories on Twitter: emerging motifs and temporal dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic
Batzdorfer, V., Steinmetz, H., Biella, M., & Alizadeh, M. (2022) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-021-00298-6 · Cited by 38
Scientific literacy, optimism about science and conservatism
Carl, N., & Cofnas, N. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.046 · Cited by 37
Lee, K. Y., Reis, H., & Rogge, R. (2020) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01141-1 · Cited by 25
Caught in a networked collusion? Homogeneity in conspiracy-related discussion networks on YouTube
Röchert, D., Neubaum, G., Roß, B., & Stieglitz, S. (2021) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2021.101866 · Cited by 38
van Eck, C. W., & Feindt, P. H. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2021.2000376 · Cited by 37
Student Identity and Aversions to Science
Brooks, C. (2016) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x16663259 · Cited by 32
Understanding Climate Change Denial
Farmer, G. T., & Cook, J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5757-8_23 · Cited by 34
Dotson, T. (2015) · Engaging Science Technology and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2015.009 · Cited by 38
Is the label ‘conspiracy theory’ a cause or a consequence of disbelief in alternative narratives?
Douglas, K. M., van Prooijen, J., & Sutton, R. M. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12548 · Cited by 32
Alsuhibani, A., Shevlin, M. E., Freeman, D. H., Sheaves, B., & Bentall, R. P. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259053 · Cited by 32
Explanatory Judgment, Moral Offense and Value-Free Science
Colombo, M., Bucher, L., & Inbar, Y. (2015) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0282-z · Cited by 35
Chayinska, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Ayanian, A. H., Gratzel, J. C., Brik, T., Kende, A., & McGarty, C. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220978278 · Cited by 34
The Psychology of AIDS Denialism
Kalichman, S. C. (2014) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000175 · Cited by 30
van Putten, I. E., Frusher, S. D., Fulton, E. A., Hobday, A. J., Jennings, S., Metcalf, S. J., Pecl, G. T., & Kraak, H. E. S. (2015) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv192 · Cited by 32
Belief in scientific–technological progress and life satisfaction: The role of personal control
Stavrova, O., Ehlebracht, D., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.013 · Cited by 31
Financial market response to extreme events indicating climatic change
Anttila-Hughes, J. (2016) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2015-50098-6 · Cited by 29
Chan, H., Tam, K., & Hong, Y. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101980 · Cited by 29
A call to action for librarians: Countering conspiracy theories in the age of QAnon
Beene, S., & Greer, K. (2021) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102292 · Cited by 28
Safford, T. G., Whitmore, E., & Hamilton, L. C. (2019) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2019.1696008 · Cited by 31
Haney, T. J. (2021) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2021.1973656 · Cited by 31
Conspiracy-Beliefs and Receptivity to Disconfirmatory Information: A Study Using the BADE Task
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., & Balzan, R. P. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211006131 · Cited by 27
Bolsen, T., Palm, R. I., & Kingsland, J. T. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1991967 · Cited by 27
Duran, N. D., Nicholson, S. P., & Dale, R. A. C. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.008 · Cited by 26
Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation
Hahn, U., Merdes, C. J., & von Sydow, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294815 · Cited by 30
Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media
Chu, J., Zhu, Y., & Ji, J. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231166542 · Cited by 27
Neylan, J., Biddlestone, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43885-2 · Cited by 33
Mayer, A., & Smith, E. K. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.002 · Cited by 26
McPhetres, J., & Nguyen, T.-V. T. (2017) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2017.1326399 · Cited by 27
Stasiuk, K., Polak, M., Doliński, D., & Maciuszek, J. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9080933 · Cited by 26
Hornsey, M. J., Fielding, K. S., McStay, R., Reser, J., & Bradley, G. L. (2015) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916515574085 · Cited by 27
Communicating about marine disease: The effects of message frames on policy support
McComas, K. A., Schuldt, J. P., Burge, C. A., & Roh, S. (2015) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.02.012 · Cited by 24
Psychological, Social, and Cultural Barriers to Public Engagement With Climate Change
Geiger, N., Middlewood, B., & Swim, J. K. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.377 · Cited by 24
Conspiracy Theories in the Classroom: Problems and Potential Solutions
Dyrendal, A., & Jolley, D. (2020) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel11100494 · Cited by 17
Practical recommendations to communicate with patients about health‐related conspiracy theories
Marques, M. D., Douglas, K. M., & Jolley, D. (2022) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.51475 · Cited by 23
Green, K., & Delgado, C. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1869854 · Cited by 23
Negacionismo climático e desinformação online
Santini, R. M., & Barros, C. E. (2022) · Liinc em Revista · doi:10.18617/liinc.v18i1.5948 · Cited by 34
Echo chamber effects in the climate change blogosphere
van Eck, C. W., Mulder, B. C., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1861048 · Cited by 25
Overconfidence and the discounting of expertise: A commentary
Benegal, S. D. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.039 · Cited by 21
Mapping the Narrative Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theories in Online Anti-vaccination Discussions
Introne, J. E., Korsunska, A., Krsova, L., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety) · doi:10.1145/3400806.3400828 · Cited by 21
Oswald, L., & Bright, J. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2071314 · Cited by 32
Insight in the Conspiracist’s Mind
de Cruys, S. V., Bervoets, J., Gadsby, S., Gijbels, D., & Poels, K. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683231203145 · Cited by 22
Motta, M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780197788844.001.0001 · Cited by 26
The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels
Harris, A. J. L., Sildmäe, O., Speekenbrink, M., & Hahn, U. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1440416 · Cited by 21
Goldfarb, J. L., & Kriner, D. L. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547016688325 · Cited by 20
Updating politicized beliefs: How motivated reasoning contributes to polarization
Su, S. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101799 · Cited by 23
Jastrzębski, J., & Chuderski, A. (2022) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2022.101705 · Cited by 23
Jolley, D., Seger, C. R., & Meleady, R. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2973 · Cited by 22
A bibliometric analysis of virtual influencers in the Web of Science
López, N. V., Boluda, I. K., Mora, E., & Riquelme, I. P. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-023-00262-2 · Cited by 28
Bringing Environmental Psychology Into Action
Ernst, A. M., & Wenzel, U. (2014) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000174 · Cited by 23
Taubert, F., Meyer-Hoeven, G., Schmid, P., Gerdes, P., & Betsch, C. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20797-y · Cited by 25
Holt, L. F., Kjærvik, S. L., & Bushman, B. J. (2022) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2022.2034021 · Cited by 19
Stall, L. M., & Petrocelli, J. V. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3998 · Cited by 22
Pummerer, L., Ditrich, L., Winter, K., & Sassenberg, K. (2022) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506221144150 · Cited by 19
Farhart, C. E., Fitz, E. B., Miller, J. M., & Saunders, K. L. (2023) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680231193514 · Cited by 19
Conspiratory fascination versus public interest: the case of ‘climategate’
Lewandowsky, S. (2014) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/111004 · Cited by 19
Self-citation“The truth is not in the middle”: Journalistic norms of climate change bloggers
van Eck, C. W., Mulder, B. C., & Dewulf, A. R. P. J. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101989 · Cited by 19
Reasonable Irrationality: the Role of Reasons in the Diffusion of Pseudoscience
Blancke, S., Boudry, M., & Braeckman, J. (2019) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340068 · Cited by 20
Nera, K., Mora, Y. L., Klein, P., Roblain, A., Oost, P. V., Terache, J., & Klein, O. (2022) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.1086 · Cited by 14
Climate change: time to Do Something Different
Page, N. C., & Page, M. P. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01294 · Cited by 18
Mohammed, D., & Rossi, M. G. (2022) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_7 · Cited by 17
Depressive symptoms and conspiracy beliefs
Green, J., Druckman, J. N., Baum, M., Lazer, D. M. J., Ognyanova, K., & Perlis, R. H. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4011 · Cited by 17
Michalski, P., Marchlewska, M., Górska, P., Rogoza, M., Molenda, Z., & Szczepańska, D. (2023) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2023.2237176 · Cited by 17
Breaking Climate Change Polarization
Çakanlar, A. (2024) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/07439156241244737 · Cited by 18
Conspiracy and bias: argumentative features and persuasiveness of conspiracy theories
Oswald, S. (2016) · Cited by 16
User Engagement with Digital Deception
Glenski, M., Volkova, S., & Kumar, S. (2020) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_3 · Cited by 19
Climate Change Knowledge and Political Identity in Australia
Tranter, B. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211032673 · Cited by 16
Andreotta, M., Boschetti, F., Farrell, S., Paris, C. L., Walker, I. A., & Hurlstone, M. J. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03437-5 · Cited by 23
Velautham, L., Ranney, M. A., & Brow, Q. S. (2019) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00007 · Cited by 20
Rule-Governed Behavior and Climate Change: Why Climate Warnings Fail to Motivate Sufficient Action
Pietras, C. J. (2022) · Behavior and Social Issues · doi:10.1007/s42822-022-00109-y · Cited by 17
Future Global Change and Cognition
Lewandowsky, S. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12188 · Cited by 15
Self-citationThe transmission game: Testing behavioral interventions in a pandemic-like simulation
Woike, J. K., Hafenbrädl, S., Kanngiesser, P., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk0428 · Cited by 14
Онлайн-дейтинг: рынок или базар? Процесс поиска брачной пары на православном сайте знакомств
Galitsina, K., Kalinovskaya, P., & Khvorostianova, O. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-65-90 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03-26
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 622-633
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2148186201
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f3ad951efb5618f5b793f160714014645166e35
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 118.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- climate change denial, conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, free market ideology, public acceptance of science, HIV/AIDS, smoking and lung cancer
- MeSH terms
- Denial, Psychological, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fraud, Humans, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Science, Space Flight, United States, Moon, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Climatic Processes, Blogging, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
