The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Evaluation of Gamified Training: Using Narrative to Improve Reactions and Learning
Abstract
Background and Aim.Gamification is growing in popularity in education and workplace training, but it is unclear which game elements are conducive to learning. The theory of gamified learning suggests that one type of gamification, the addition of game fiction/narrative, can be used to improve learning outcomes, and the Technology-Enhanced Training Effectiveness Model (TETEM) suggests individual differences impact the strength of this effect. From this theoretical basis, this study gamified a training module with game fiction in order to improve outcomes over the original training. Results and Conclusion. In a study of 273 learners, trainees were significantly more satisfied with training enhanced with game fiction over the control text ( d = 0.65) but did not differ in declarative knowledge scores by condition. Further, trainees in the control condition scored higher on procedural knowledge than trainees in the game fiction condition, although the effect was smaller ( d = −0.40). Thus, the use of narrative improved reactions to training but at some cost to training effectiveness. Attitudes toward game-based learning were also tested as a moderator of the condition-outcome relationship.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the context of games, results on the effectiveness of the inclusion of game fiction have been mixed (Armstrong and Landers 2017).”
From The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Armstrong and Landers 2017
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048 · cited 1×
“Alternatively, game fiction training design might increase cognitive load (Sweller, 1988), which could then decrease learning, as suggested by the distraction hypothesis (Adams et al., 2012).”
BackgroundFrom game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments · doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040 · Cited by 8,402
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159 · cited 1×
“Positive attitudes toward playing games have been found to predict intention to play games (Hsu & Lu, 2004), which should in turn predict game play behaviors (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008; Venkatesh & Davis, 2000).”
BackgroundDavis, F. D. (1993) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · Cited by 4,754
Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model
Garris, R. D., Ahlers, R. H., & Driskell, J. E. (2002) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878102238607 · Cited by 3,480
Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction*
Malone, T. W. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2 · Cited by 2,197
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126 · cited 1×
“For example, if the game fiction intervention could have been created to target training valence (i.e., an attitude), trainees might be more motivated to learn the content, which would have led to higher declarative knowledge scores (Colquitt, LePine, & Noe, 2000).”
BackgroundWhy do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience
Hsu, C., & Lu, H. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014 · Cited by 2,099
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033 · Cited by 2,064
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 · Cited by 1,831 · cited 1×
“The researchers developed a procedural knowledge measure based on the training content, consisting of 3 essay questions, in order to more fully capture the multi-faceted nature of learning (Kraiger, Ford, & Salas, 1993).”
BackgroundStudent Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages*
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9 · Cited by 1,799
Personnel Selection in Organizations
Murphy, K. R., Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258598 · Cited by 1,646
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715 · Cited by 1,568
Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90005-6 · Cited by 1,441
A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA
ALLIGER, G. M., TANNENBAUM, S. I., BENNETT, W., TRAVER, H., & SHOTLAND, A. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x · Cited by 948
Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning: Linking Serious Games and Gamification of Learning
Landers, R. N. (2014) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878114563660 · Cited by 918
Self-citationImproving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation
Osborne, J. W. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/qbpc-gk17 · Cited by 891
The transfer of training: what really matters
Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x · Cited by 886
Landers, R. N., & Behrend, T. S. (2015) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2015.13 · Cited by 714
Self-citationThe labor economics of paid crowdsourcing
Horton, J. J., & Chilton, L. B. (2010) · ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC) · doi:10.1145/1807342.1807376 · Cited by 612
Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom
Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., & Schellens, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.022 · Cited by 574
An extension of control group design
Solomon, R. L. (1949) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0062958 · Cited by 541 · cited 1×
“Conducting the experiment using a four-group design (Solomon, 1949) would have addressed additional threats to internal and external validity.”
MethodThe effect of virtual achievements on student engagement
Denny, P. C. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470763 · Cited by 500
Combining Software Games with Education: Evaluation of its Educational Effectiveness
Virvou, M. K., Katsionis, G., & Μανός, Κ. (2005) · Cited by 423
Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight
Gopher, D., Well, M., & Bareket, T. (1994) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089403600301 · Cited by 421
Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning: An Empirical Study
Bedwell, W. L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2012) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878112439444 · Cited by 393
An Empirical Test of the Theory of Gamified Learning
Landers, R. N., & Landers, A. K. (2014) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878114563662 · Cited by 363
Self-citationA theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science
Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20063 · Cited by 323
Landers, R. N., & Armstrong, M. B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.031 · Cited by 289
Self-citationLanders, R. N., & Callan, R. C. (2011) · Serious Games and Edutainment Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_20 · Cited by 272
Self-citationAffective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages
Kopfman, J. E., Smith, S. W., Yun, J. K. A., & Hodges, A. (1998) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909889809365508 · Cited by 246
Dickey, M. D. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01032.x · Cited by 239
Li, W., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. W. (2012) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/2380116.2380131 · Cited by 223
Effects of fantasy contexts on children's learning and motivation: Making learning more fun.
Parker, L. E., & Lepper, M. R. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.625 · Cited by 215
Structural components of reading time
Graesser, A. C., Hoffman, N. L., & Clark, L. F. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90132-2 · Cited by 209
Narrative games for learning: Testing the discovery and narrative hypotheses.
Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., MacNamara, A., Koenig, A., & Wainess, R. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025595 · Cited by 207
Evaluation of a pervasive game for domestic energy engagement among teenagers
Gustafsson, A., Katzeff, C., & Bång, M. (2009) · Computers in entertainment · doi:10.1145/1658866.1658873 · Cited by 180
Altering comprehension: The effect of biasing titles on text comprehension
Kozminsky, E. (1977) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197390 · Cited by 173
Brown, K. G. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.991 · Cited by 165
From users to designers: Building a self-organizing game-based learning environment
Squire, K. D., Giovanetto, L., DeVane, B., & Durga, S. (2005) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/bf02763688 · Cited by 154
Advanced Outlines, Familiarity, and Text Genre on Retention of Prose
Graesser, A. C., Hauft-Smith, K., Cohen, A. D., & Pyles, L. D. (1980) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1980.11011745 · Cited by 139
Text skimming: The process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure.
Duggan, G. B., & Payne, S. J. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0016995 · Cited by 129
Kraiger, K. (2008) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00086.x · Cited by 106
Discovery-based games for learning software
Dong, T., Dontcheva, M., Joseph, D., Karahalios, K. G., Newman, M., & Ackerman, M. S. (2012) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208358 · Cited by 94
INFLUENCE OF TEXT GENRE ON ADULTS' MONITORING OF UNDERSTANDING AND RECALL
Zabrucky, D. M. K. M. (1999) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/036012799267440 · Cited by 91
Armstrong, M. B., Landers, R. N., & Collmus, A. B. (2016) · Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8651-9.ch007 · Cited by 85
Self-citationAge Differences in Processing Expository and Narrative Text
Tun, P. A. (1989) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/44.1.p9 · Cited by 85
Cognitive processes in skimming stories.
Masson, M. E. J. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.400 · Cited by 73
Reactions to Narrative and Statistical Written Messages Promoting Organ Donation
Feeley, T. H., Marshall, H. M., & Reinhart, A. M. (2006) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934210600918758 · Cited by 68
Validation of the Beneficial and Harmful Work-Related Social Media Behavioral Taxonomies
Landers, R. N., & Callan, R. C. (2014) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439314524891 · Cited by 50
Self-citationGetting a clue: creating student detectives and dragon slayers in your library
Smith, A., & Baker, L. (2011) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/00907321111186659 · Cited by 50
Training Evaluation in Virtual Worlds: Development of a Model
Landers, R. N., & Callan, R. C. (2012) · Journal of Virtual Worlds Research · doi:10.4101/jvwr.v5i3.6335 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1037/10025595 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-9010.g5.5.678 · DOI
- Deterding S., Khaled R., Nacke L., Dixon D. (2011, May). Gamification: Toward a definition. Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/02-Deterding-Khaled-Nacke-Dixon.pdf
- 10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017-1 · DOI · Paper page
- McDrury J., 2002, Learning through storytelling in higher education: Using reflection & experience to improve learning
- Serrano E. L., 2004, Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 22, 1
- 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w · Cited by 2,594
Gamification Science, Its History and Future: Definitions and a Research Agenda
Landers, R. N., Auer, E. M., Collmus, A. B., & Armstrong, M. B. (2018) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878118774385 · Cited by 388
Self-citationLi, L., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10337-7 · Cited by 475
Behl, A., Jayawardena, N. S., Pereira, V. E., Islam, N., Giudice, M. D., & Choudrie, J. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121445 · Cited by 307
A qualitative investigation of student perceptions of game elements in a gamified course
Aldemir, T., Çelik, B., & Akilli, G. K. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.001 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, M. B., & Landers, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Old Dominion University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Armstrong, Michael B.
- ORCID
- Landers, Richard N.
- Venue
- Simulation & Gaming
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-05-15
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 513-538
- ISSN
- 1046-8781 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-826X
- OpenAlex
- W2616282785
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Simulation & Gaming (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Keywords
- gamification, employee training, individual differences, procedural knowledge, declarative knowledge, student satisfaction, training effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review