Cited by 74Child Abuse and TraumaBullying, Victimization, and AggressionPersonality Traits and Psychology

Childhood physical abuse and aggression: Shame and narcissistic vulnerability

Keene, Amanda C., Epps, James·2016·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

This study examined narcissistic vulnerability and shame-proneness as potential mediators between childhood physical abuse (CPA) and adult anger and aggression. Participants were 400 undergraduate students, 134 of whom had a history of CPA. All participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing history of CPA, shame-proneness, narcissistic vulnerability, physical aggression, trait anger, and hostility. Results indicated abused participants were more angry and aggressive and experienced higher levels of shame-proneness and narcissistic vulnerability than nonabused participants. Multiple mediation analyses showed that narcissistic vulnerability, but not shame-proneness, partially mediated the relation between abuse and physical aggression. However, narcissistic vulnerability and shame-proneness both emerged as partial mediators between abuse and the anger and hostility variables. These findings suggest that narcissistic vulnerability and shame-proneness may function as mediators of adjustment following childhood maltreatment. Study limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.012

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between trauma and narcissism has been documented and the term 'trauma-associated narcissistic symptoms' has been proposed.

    “The relationship between trauma and narcissism has been documented [58, 65–67] and the term ‘trauma-associated narcissistic symptoms’ has been proposed to identify such features [68].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Third-generation studies have documented differential etiologies for vulnerable versus grandiose narcissism and a multifactorial etiology of NPD.

    “Those studies have documented differential etiologies for vulnerable versus grandiose narcissism and a multifactorial etiology of NPD.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keene, A. C., & Epps, J.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Epps, James
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
51
Pages
276-283
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2173169223
Cited by
74
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
child physical abuse, narcissistic vulnerability, shame proneness, physical aggression, trait anger, hostility, child abuse, mediation, adult adjustment
MeSH terms
Physical Abuse, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Analysis of Variance, Anger, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Shame, United States, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review