The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?
Abstract
Methods variance and its effects are at the center of a debate in organizational science. Most of the debate, however, is focused on the prevalence of common methods variance and ignores common methods bias, or the divergence between observed and true relationships among constructs. This article assesses the level of common methods bias in all multitrait-multimethod correlation matrices published over a 12-year period in a set of six social science journals using a combination of structural equation modeling and meta-analysis. The results indicate that only 46% of the variation in measures is attributable to the constructs, that 32% of the observed variation in measures is attributable to common methods variance, and that common methods variance results in a 26% bias in the observed relationships among constructs. This level of bias is cause for concern but does not invalidate many research findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To help mitigate concerns about effects of transient sources of common method bias, we employed a lagged longitudinal design (Study 2; Doty and Glick, 1998;Podsakoff et al., 2003;Spector, 2006).”
From Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance (2023) · cites this paper as Doty and Glick, 1998
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,933
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392563 · Cited by 4,372
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03396-0 · Cited by 2,564
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1177/002224378702400307 · DOI
- Campbell, D. T., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 93
- Doty, D. H., Annual Meetings of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Doty, D. H., National Meetings of the Academy of Management
- Fiske, D. W., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 77
- 10.2307/256218 · DOI
- Hackman, J. R., 1980, Work redesign
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Howard, M. C., Boudreaux, M., & Oglesby, M. T. (2024) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2024.2393462 · Cited by 208
“…be able to distinguish between research designs known to produce more or less CMB; the amount of variance explained by the first factor should be greater for weaker methodological designs, and it should be smaller for stronger methodological designs (Baumgartner et al., 2021; Doty & Glick, 1998).”
Minichilli, A., Nordqvist, M., Corbetta, G., & Amore, M. D. (2014) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12095 · Cited by 183
“Also, in this case, the use of a single informant seems not to raise a problem of common method variance (Doty and Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2003) because our analyses rely on both survey and archival data, thus excluding the possibility of internal correlation between different items from the…”
MethodCassematis, P., & Wortley, R. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1548-3 · Cited by 206
Chowdhury, S., Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Dey, P., & Budhwar, P. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04487-1 · Cited by 165
The critical path to family firm success through entrepreneurial risk taking and image
Memili, E., Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., Zellweger, T. M., & Barnett, T. (2010) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.10.005 · Cited by 179
“While research suggests that common method problems are not likely to affect observed relationships (Doty and Glick, 1998 and Spector, 2006), we cannot rule out that the observed relationships may have been affected.”
BackgroundCollaboration, information and the geography of innovation in knowledge intensive business services
Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2011) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr003 · Cited by 179
The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00165 · Cited by 187
“First, because the data are self-reported, common method variance may have inflated correlations (cf. Doty and Glick, 1998).”
MethodBeyond family-friendly: The construct and measurement of singles-friendly work culture
Casper, W. J., Weltman, D., & Kwesiga, E. N. (2007) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.01.001 · Cited by 179
“However, Doty and Glick (1998) found that although commonmethod variance often inXuences results, the bias is rarely large enough to invalidate Wndings.”
BackgroundBhattarai, C. R., Kwong, C. C. Y., & Tasavori, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.042 · Cited by 187
Karatepe, O. M., & Uludağ, O. (2007) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.645 · Cited by 175
Recommendations for improving the construct clarity of higher-order multidimensional constructs
Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., Chang, C.-H. D., Djurdjevic, E., & Taing, M. U. (2011) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.006 · Cited by 175
Helfrich, C. D., Dolan, E. D., Simonetti, J. A., Reid, R. J., Joos, S. K., Wakefield, B. J., Schectman, G., Stark, R., Fihn, S. D., Harvey, H. B., et al. (2014) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2702-z · Cited by 185
Board Leadership and Strategy Involvement in Small Firms: A Team Production Approach
Machold, S., Huse, M., Minichilli, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2011) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00852.x · Cited by 174
The job demands–resources model and counterproductive work behaviour: The role of job-related affect
Balducci, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Fraccaroli, F. (2011) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594321003669061 · Cited by 197
“This was much less than the variance explained by the method factor in Williams et al. (1989)—see Table 3—although it was more than that observed by Facteau et al. (1995)—on this see also Doty and Glick (1998).”
MethodResultDemerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Ebbinghaus, M. (2002) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320244000274 · Cited by 171
“One-sided scales increase acquiescence tendencies and thus may lead to artificial factor solutions (Doty & Glick, 1998), in which positively and negatively worded items are likely to cluster in separate factors (Demerouti & Nachreiner, 1996; Lee & Ashforth, 1990).”
BackgroundOjha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.001 · Cited by 171
“Third, though we controlled for, and evaluated, the impact for common method bias but it still could be issue for the study as the construct measurement approach required individuals to rate the items that measured all constructs (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
MethodSupply integration: An investigation of its multi-dimensionality and relational antecedents
Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2010) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.010 · Cited by 169
Miner, K. N., Settles, I. H., Pratt-Hyatt, J. S., & Brady, C. C. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00891.x · Cited by 166
Patrick, A., Laschinger, H. K. S., Wong, C. A., & Finegan, J. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01238.x · Cited by 182
Estryn-Behar, M. R., Doppia, M.-A., Guetarni, K., Fry, C., Machet, G., Pelloux, P., Aune, I., Muster, D., Lassaunière, J.-M., & Prudhomme, C. (2010) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emj.2009.082594 · Cited by 168
“Limitations of our study and recommendations for future research Because we used self-reported measures for the predictor variables and for the dependent variables (ie, burnout and intent to leave), a common-method bias may exist.(55) In order to increase the validity of the outcomes, physicians’ self-assessments and…”
MethodPerceived Ubiquity in Mobile Services
Okazaki, S., & Mendez, F. (2013) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.10.001 · Cited by 201
“However, this figure is far below the benchmark recommended by Doty and Glick (1998).”
BackgroundGrant, A. M., & Campbell, E. M. (2006) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317906x169553 · Cited by 170
Flores, W. R., Antonsen, E., & Ekstedt, M. (2014) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.03.004 · Cited by 166
Triana, M. D. C., Jayasinghe, M. M., Pieper, J. R., Delgado, D. M., & Li, M. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318776772 · Cited by 163
Karatepe, O. M., & Bekteshi, L. (2007) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.09.004 · Cited by 161
Further Development and Validation of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) Scale
Winwood, P. C., Lushington, K., & Winefield, A. H. (2006) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000194164.14081.06 · Cited by 160
“The face validity of the subscale items is excellent and, in addition, the acute fatigue and recovery subscales both contain 2 of 5, and 3 of 5 negatively keyed items respectively, satisfying the suggestions of various researchers on the importance of incorporating both positive and negatively keyed items in self-repo…”
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2014) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2014.913592 · Cited by 183
“Due to the common method variance (Doty & Glick, 1998), relationships between self-rated variables describe the upper bound of correlations.”
MethodInfluentialHoejmose, S. U., Brammer, S. J., & Millington, A. (2013) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571311322733 · Cited by 175
“Common methods bias was tested for using the methodology developed by Podsakoff et al. (2003) and Doty and Glick (1998).”
BackgroundMethodThe Antecedents and Performance Implications of Cooperative Exchange Norms
Bercovitz, J. E. L., Jap, S. D., & Nickerson, J. A. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0213 · Cited by 156
The impact of trust and reputation on the transfer of best practices
Lucas, L. M. (2005) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270510610350 · Cited by 160
“To assess further whether there was common method bias, the results were subjected to an additional procedure in which the unstandardized regression coefficients were multiplied by 0.74 and divided by the standard error (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJob crafting profiles and work engagement: A person-centered approach
Mäkikangas, A. (2018) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.001 · Cited by 178
Agnihotri, R., Gabler, C. B., Itani, O. S., Jaramillo, F., & Krush, M. T. (2017) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.2016.1272053 · Cited by 174
An Empirical Review of the Employment Interview Construct Literature
Huffcutt, A. I. (2011) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00535.x · Cited by 165
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2013) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796253 · Cited by 150
“TAKS scores are highly specific and should generate the maximum level of congruence with the objective performance data (Doty and Glick 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe emotional implications of organizational politics: A process model
Rosen, C. C., Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, K. M. (2009) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708099836 · Cited by 150
“In addition, recent research suggests that CMV may not systematically bias results and is likely to not be as problematic as researchers have suggested (Doty & Glick, 1998; Keeping & Levy, 2000; Spector, 2006).”
BackgroundNew Service Development Competence and Performance: An Empirical Investigation in Retail Banking
Menor, L. J., & Roth, A. V. (2008) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.3401/poms.1080.0034 · Cited by 148
“Doty and Glick (1998) noted that although the level of bias is a cause for concern, it does not invali-date many of the research findings.”
BackgroundResultNowell, B. L., & Boyd, N. M. (2014) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9667-x · Cited by 160
Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback
Jawahar, I. M. “. (2006) · Journal of Labor Research · doi:10.1007/s12122-006-1004-1 · Cited by 159
Shirom, A., Nirel, N., & Vinokur, A. D. (2009) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00411.x · Cited by 163
“Common method variance is expected to inflate the correlations between self-reported measures in our questionnaire (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
MethodThe effect of institutional pressure on cooperative and coercive ‘green’ supply chain practices
Hoejmose, S. U., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. (2014) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2014.07.002 · Cited by 156
Knowledge sharing in cross‐functional teams: a coopetitive model
Ghobadi, S., & D’Ambra, J. (2012) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673271211218889 · Cited by 147
“Two scales were adopted to help reduce the common method bias (Doty and Glick, 1998): 1.”
MethodHow knowledge management impacts performance in projects: An empirical study
Reich, B. H., Gemino, A., & Sauer, C. (2013) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.004 · Cited by 144
Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors?
Airila, A., Hakanen, J., Punakallio, A., Lusa, S., & Luukkonen, R. A. (2012) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-012-0732-1 · Cited by 145
“However, we controlled for baseline work ability in our study, which assumingly diminished the risk of common method bias (Doty and Glick 1998).”
MethodLatorre, F., Guest, D. E., Ramos, J., & Gracia, F. J. (2016) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.005 · Cited by 164
Robertson, J. L. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3569-4 · Cited by 157
Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson's behavioural performance
Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu‐Nathan, T. S. (2014) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.2013.870184 · Cited by 158
“If the bias exists, then a single factor will emerge (Podsakoff et al. 2003), or most of the variance will be explained by one factor (Doty and Glick 1998).”
BackgroundKristensen, S. M., Larsen, T. B., Urke, H. B., & Danielsen, A. G. (2023) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-023-01770-1 · Cited by 230
“Any bias associated with self-report measures, such as common method bias (Doty & Glick, 1998) or under- and overreporting (Hunt et al., 2003; Sigmon et al., 2005), might be considered another limitation, as all data was self-reported in this study.”
MethodFlores, W. R., & Ekstedt, M. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2016.01.004 · Cited by 144
“The data was collected via self-reported survey, thus the potential for both nonresponse bias and common method bias (CMB) should be addressed (Podsakoff, 1986; Doty & Glick, 1998).”
MethodPatel, P. C., & Conklin, B. (2010) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00404.x · Cited by 151
“Prior research has shown that even if such a bias were present in the data, it should not significantly affect the results or conclusions (Doty & Glick, 1998; Spector & Brannick, 1995).”
BackgroundEyal, O., & Kark, R. (2004) · Leadership and Policy in Schools · doi:10.1080/15700760490503715 · Cited by 140
“Although studies have shown that common-method bias is rarely strong enough to invalidate research findings (e.g., Doty & Glick, 1998), replication and extensions of our findings using experimental and longitudinal designs are needed.”
New measures of stereotypical beliefs about older workers' ability and desire for development
Maurer, T. J., Barbeite, F. G., Weiss, E. M., & Lippstreu, M. (2008) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940810869024 · Cited by 137
“First, separating the surveys into different points in time can help to reduce the possibility of consistency biases and method variance ( Doty and Glick, 1998”
MethodRaffiee, J., & Coff, R. W. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0286 · Cited by 149
“…method variance (CMV) may be overstated (Spector, 2006) and rarely strong enough to invalidate the statistical significance of research findings (Doty & Glick, 1998), we examined a number of CMV-related aspects to ensure the validity of the results reported, particularlywith regards to the…”
Employees' Intentions to Retire Early
van Dam, K., van der Vorst, J. D. M., & HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D. (2009) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/0894845308327274 · Cited by 137
“First, because all information came from one source, a common-method bias may exist (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003).”
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Tims, M., & Akkermans, J. (2016) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2016.1209489 · Cited by 168
“In addition, the distribution of measurements over time and the use of change scores may have diminished the risks for common method bias (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
Chang, Y.-W., & Polonsky, M. J. (2011) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.05.003 · Cited by 154
The link between high performance work practices and organizational performance
Obeidat, S. M. I., Mitchell, R. J., & Bray, M. (2016) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-08-2015-0163 · Cited by 136
Socially responsible supply chains: power asymmetries and joint dependence
Hoejmose, S. U., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. (2013) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-01-2012-0033 · Cited by 145
UNDERSTANDING THE DETERMINANTS OF EMPLOYER USE OF SELECTION METHODS
Wilk, S. L., & Cappelli, P. H. (2003) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00145.x · Cited by 134
What Drives the Implementation of Diversity Management Programs? Evidence from Public Organizations
Pitts, D. W., Hicklin, A., Hawes, D. P., & Melton, E. K. (2010) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mup044 · Cited by 143
Kunkel, T., Funk, D. C., & Hill, B. (2013) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.27.3.177 · Cited by 133
Developmental HRM, employee well‐being and performance: The moderating role of developing leadership
Marescaux, E., Winne, S. D., & Forrier, A. (2018) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12168 · Cited by 144
“However, we used validated measures that were extensively psychometrically evaluated and therefore less prone to CMB (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
MethodInfluentialWayne, J. H., Matthews, R. A., Crawford, W. S., & Casper, W. J. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21971 · Cited by 154
Developing a competency-based framework for teachers’ entrepreneurial behaviour
van Dam, K., Schipper, M., & Runhaar, P. R. (2009) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.038 · Cited by 131
Adopting HRM practices and their effectiveness in small firms facing product‐market competition
Patel, P. C., & Cardon, M. (2010) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20346 · Cited by 136
Authentic leadership and nurse-assessed adverse patient outcomes
Wong, C. A., & Giallonardo, L. M. (2013) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12075 · Cited by 139
Personal Control in Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation with Newcomers
Ashforth, B. E., & Saks, A. M. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700533002 · Cited by 130
Mitchell, R. J., Obeidat, S. M. I., & Bray, M. (2013) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21587 · Cited by 132
“…is acknowledged and has been addressed by the authors, we also recognize that there is a growing acceptance of research indicating that CMV is unlikely to invalidate study findings, particularly in the investigation of complex models (Crampton & Wagner, 1994; Doty & Glick, 1998; Spector, 2006).”
BackgroundSavelsbergh, C. M. J. H., HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D., & Poell, R. F. (2009) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496409340055 · Cited by 149
“This multirater approach to measuring team performance was used to avoid the common-method bias that hampered self-assessments of performance by team members only (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003).”
MethodMorrow, S. L., McGonagle, A. K., Dove-Steinkamp, M. L., Walker, C. T., Marmet, M. D., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2009) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.011 · Cited by 128
Babalola, M. T., Ren, S., Ogbonnaya, C. N., Riisla, K., Soetan, G. T., & Gok, K. (2020) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726720978687 · Cited by 134
“Indeed, time-lagged designs have been shown to be effective for reducing common-method variance (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundComparing Two Measures of Burnout Among Dentists in Australia.
Winwood, P. C., & Winefield, A. H. (2004) · International Journal of Stress Management · doi:10.1037/1072-5245.11.3.282 · Cited by 128
Subjective relational experiences and employee innovative behaviors in the workplace
Peretz, H. V., Binyamin, G., & Carmeli, A. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.005 · Cited by 136
Affectivity, conflicts in the work–family interface, and hotel employee outcomes
Karatepe, O. M., & Uludağ, O. (2007) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.001 · Cited by 134
The motivational effects of diminished self-esteem for employees who experience abusive supervision
Vogel, R. M., & Mitchell, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314566462 · Cited by 151
“In the first two studies, separating the surveys in time by 1 month reduces the likelihood of CMV biasing the results (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2003); furthermore, the results of our empirical tests indicated that CMV did not bias the results.”
ResultThe impacts of external network and business group on innovation: Do the types of innovation matter?
Kim, Y., & Lui, S. S.-Y. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.006 · Cited by 126
Enhancing firm performance: The role of brand orientation in business-to-business marketing
Chang, Y., Wang, X., & Arnett, D. B. (2018) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.031 · Cited by 134
Eide, A. E., Sæther, E. A., & Aspelund, A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120053 · Cited by 147
Itani, O. S., Krush, M. T., Agnihotri, R., & Trainor, K. J. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.015 · Cited by 152
Conscientiousness and contextual performance
Jawahar, I. M. “., & Carr, D. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710745923 · Cited by 125
Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership and individual outcomes
de Vries, R. E., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. C. B. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00097-8 · Cited by 125
Perceived organizational politics, emotional intelligence and work outcomes
Meisler, G., & Vigoda‐Gadot, E. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-02-2012-0040 · Cited by 133
“Although several scholars have argued that common method variance does not invalidate most research findings (see: Crampton and Wagner, 1994; Doty and Glick, 1998; Spector, 2006), relying solely on self-report data may raise concerns regarding this issue.”
BackgroundNeubaum, D. O., Thomas, C. H., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. B. L. (2016) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486516673701 · Cited by 124
“We performed multiple post hoc tests for common method variance, and our results indicated that any impact of common method variance was minimal and did not bias the final results (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
MethodLindebaum, D., & Cartwright, S. (2010) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00933.x · Cited by 141
Kahiya, E. T. (2013) · Journal of International Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1007/s10843-013-0102-4 · Cited by 127
A multilevel study on servant leadership, job boredom and job crafting
Harju, L. K., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hakanen, J. (2018) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-08-2016-0237 · Cited by 122
“However, the long time between measurements ameliorates this potential bias (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundBabalola, M. T., Ren, S., Kobinah, T., Qu, Y. E., Garba, O. A., & Guo, L. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.02.007 · Cited by 124
Antecedents and outcomes of service recovery performance in a public health‐care environment
Ashill, N. J., Carruthers, J., & Krisjanous, J. (2005) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040510609916 · Cited by 117
Homework Compliance Counts in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
LeBeau, R. T., Davies, C. D., Culver, N. C., & Craske, M. G. (2013) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2013.763286 · Cited by 105
“The relationship between selfreport ratings of homework compliance and symptom severity may also be artificially inflated by virtue of commonmethods variance (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundLioukas, C. S., Reuer, J. J., & Zollo, M. (2015) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12179 · Cited by 117
Malca, O., Peña-Vinces, J. C., & Acedo, F. J. (2019) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00185-2 · Cited by 99
“The study took into account the low response rate in the context of emerging economies (e.g. Peña-Vinces et al. 2017) and took measures to avoid potential bias in the employment of mono-methods (Chang et al. 2010; Doty and Glick 1998; Podsakoff et al. 2003).”
Analyzing the use of UTAUT model in explaining an online behaviour: Internet banking adoption
AlQeisi, K. (2009) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · Cited by 118
Segmenting Mainland Chinese Tourists to Taiwan by Destination Familiarity: a Factor‐cluster Approach
Chen, C.-C. B., & Lin, Y.-H. P. (2011) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.864 · Cited by 116
Job Design and the Employee Innovation Process: The Mediating Role of Learning Strategies
Holman, D. J., Totterdell, P., Axtell, C. M., Stride, C., Port, R. L., Svensson, R., & Zibarras, L. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9242-5 · Cited by 128
“An improvement in model fit is not uncommon when adding a common method factor (Doty and Glick 1998; Meade et al. 2007).”
Miner-Rubino, K. N., & Reed, W. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00695.x · Cited by 115
Work‐home interference among nurses: reciprocal relationships with job demands and health
HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & The NEXT Study Group coordinated by Hans‐Martin Hasselhorn (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04630.x · Cited by 118
“As we used self-report measures both for the predictor variables, i.e. job demands, for WHI (the mediator) and for the outcome variable, i.e. general health, a common-method bias may exist (Doty & Glick 1998, Podsakoff et al. 2003).”
MethodThe Sales Lead Black Hole: On Sales Reps' Follow-Up of Marketing Leads
Sabnis, G., Chatterjee, S. C., Grewal, R., & Lilien, G. L. (2012) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0047 · Cited by 115
Ommen, O., Janßen, C., Neugebauer, E. A. M., Bouillon, B., Rehm, K. E., Rangger, C., Erli, H. J., & Pfaff, H. (2008) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.016 · Cited by 119
“This level of bias is a real cause for concern but does not invalidate research findings in general [55].”
Do the Hustle! Empowerment from Side-Hustles and Its Effects on Full-Time Work Performance
Sessions, H., Nahrgang, J. D., Vaulont, M. J., Williams, R., & Bartels, A. L. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0164 · Cited by 116
Leadership in the Context of Temporary Organizations
Tyssen, A. K., Wald, A. E., & Heidenreich, S. (2013) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051813502086 · Cited by 118
Perceptions of Employee Volunteering: Is It “Credited” or “Stigmatized” by Colleagues?
Rodell, J. B., & Lynch, J. W. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0566 · Cited by 124
“We introduced temporal and source separation wherever possible—two common procedural remedies that combat this threat (Doty & Glick, 1998)—collecting our data across two time periods and sources.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Doty, D. Harold
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-406
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W2168082050
- Cited by
- 1,380
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- measurement bias, construct relationships, measurement error, organizational analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review