The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?
Abstract
Methods variance and its effects are at the center of a debate in organizational science. Most of the debate, however, is focused on the prevalence of common methods variance and ignores common methods bias, or the divergence between observed and true relationships among constructs. This article assesses the level of common methods bias in all multitrait-multimethod correlation matrices published over a 12-year period in a set of six social science journals using a combination of structural equation modeling and meta-analysis. The results indicate that only 46% of the variation in measures is attributable to the constructs, that 32% of the observed variation in measures is attributable to common methods variance, and that common methods variance results in a 26% bias in the observed relationships among constructs. This level of bias is cause for concern but does not invalidate many research findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To help mitigate concerns about effects of transient sources of common method bias, we employed a lagged longitudinal design (Study 2; Doty and Glick, 1998;Podsakoff et al., 2003;Spector, 2006).”
From Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance (2023) · cites this paper as Doty and Glick, 1998
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,933
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392563 · Cited by 4,372
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03396-0 · Cited by 2,564
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1177/002224378702400307 · DOI
- Campbell, D. T., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 93
- Doty, D. H., Annual Meetings of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Doty, D. H., National Meetings of the Academy of Management
- Fiske, D. W., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 77
- 10.2307/256218 · DOI
- Hackman, J. R., 1980, Work redesign
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Verhagen, T., van den Hooff, B., & Meents, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00388 · Cited by 84
“Artificial increase in predictive validity and nomological validity (Doty & Glick, 1998; Furr & Bacharach, 2008).”
BackgroundLevin, D. Z., Walter, J., Appleyard, M. M., & Cross, R. (2015) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601115574429 · Cited by 83
“…for each network question to prevent the use of prior answers to fill in retrieval gaps (Podsakoff et al., 2003), relying on but not revealing to respondents the complex formula for network bridging (cf. Doty & Glick, 1998), and hypothesizing moderator (not main) effects (Lance et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFonti, F., Maoret, M., & Whitbred, R. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2470 · Cited by 76
The Eudaimonics of Human Strengths: The Relations Between Character Strengths and Well-Being
Harzer, C. (2016) · International handbooks of quality-of-life · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_20 · Cited by 84
Formal controls and alliance performance: The effects of alliance motivation and informal controls
Stouthuysen, K., Slabbinck, H., & Roodhooft, F. (2017) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2017.03.002 · Cited by 78
Changing experiences of work dirtiness, occupational disidentification, and employee withdrawal.
Schaubroeck, J. M., Lam, L. W., Lai, J. Y. M., Lennard, A. C., Peng, A. C., & Chan, K. W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000330 · Cited by 81
Customer focus, supply‐chain relational capabilities and performance
Lado, A. A., Paulraj, A., & Chen, I. J. (2011) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574091111156550 · Cited by 75
“Since a single factor did not emerge and the first factor did not account for most of the variance, we conclude that common method variance might not be an issue ( Doty and Glick, 1998”
BackgroundPacification or Aggravation? The Effects of Talking about Supervisor Unfairness
Baer, M. D., Rodell, J. B., Dhensa‐Kahlon, R. K., Colquitt, J. A., Zipay, K. P., Burgess, R., & Outlaw, R. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0630 · Cited by 80
“Doty and Glick (1998) argued that temporal separation is one of the most effective means of reducing common method bias, and can be as effective as source separation.”
BackgroundIshikawa, J. (2012) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9282-z · Cited by 86
Mathias, B. D., Lux, S., Crook, T. R., Autry, C. W., & Zaretzki, R. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-2030-6 · Cited by 77
“as the result of changes in IVs over a similar time (either concurrent or lagged); CMV is minimized and causal inference is heightened, but proxy variables often diminish explained variance (if the data are archival) and/or the data are unwieldy to collect (if surveys are repeatedly administered) (Doty and Glick 1998).”
BackgroundHEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D., Mulder, R. H., König, C., & Anselmann, V. (2017) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000006505 · Cited by 75
“Because we used self-report measures for all model variables, a common-method bias may exist.([49]) Future work might incorporate both nurses’ self-assessments and assessments by supervisors and/or near colleagues to increase the validity of the outcomes.”
Treadway, D. C., Breland, J. W., Adams, G. L., Duke, A. B., & Williams, L. A. (2009) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.09.004 · Cited by 74
Board members’ contribution to strategy: The mediating role of board internal processes
Castro, C. B., Periñán, M. D. M. V., & Domínguez-CC, M. (2017) · European Research on Management and Business Economics · doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.01.002 · Cited by 74
“In order to deal with common method bias (Doty & Glick, 1998), we applied a number of procedural remedies in the instrument development and data collection phase (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003).”
MethodFostering low-carbon production and logistics systems: framework and empirical evidence
Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Sarkis, J., Latan, H., Roubaud, D., Filho, M. G., & de Queiroz, M. M. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1834639 · Cited by 74
“…1.711 – GOProc 0.396 0.368 0.247 0.370 1.923 – GOLog 0.188 0.150 0.001 0.152 1.640 – PCO 0.428 0.401 – 0.404 – 0.185 arises from methodological and response variances that affect the correlation between variables measured using the same method (Doty and Glick 1998; MacKenzie and Podsakoff 2012).”
MethodInfluentialThe Driver Behavior Questionnaire as accident predictor; A methodological re-meta-analysis
af Wåhlberg, A. E., Barraclough, P., & Freeman, J. (2015) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 74
Relationship learning and performance enhancement via advanced information technology
Jean, R. “., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2010) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651331011037520 · Cited by 77
“All of the measures used in this research were collected via the same questionnaire, which introduced the possibility of common method bias (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
MethodLiu, H., Ding, X., Guo, H., & Luo, J. (2012) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9309-5 · Cited by 76
Harrison, D. A., & Price, K. H. (2003) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(03)00013-5 · Cited by 74
Parry, E., Farndale, E., Brewster, C. J., & MORLEY, M. J. (2020) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12405 · Cited by 83
“…practitioners; and generally weak explanations of observed differences and similarities (Cascio, 2012; Cheng, 2007; Chidlow et al., 2015; Clark, Gospel and Montgomery, 1999; Doty and Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2003; Romani et al., 2018; Starkey and Madan, 2001; Yang, Wang and Su, 2000).”
BackgroundExport Stages and Export Barriers: Revisiting Traditional Export Development
Kahiya, E. T., & Dean, D. (2015) · Thunderbird International Business Review · doi:10.1002/tie.21741 · Cited by 81
Braje, I. N., Печурина, А., Bıçakcıoğlu‐Peynirci, N., Miguel, C., Alonso‐Almeida, M. D. M., & Giglio, C. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-04-2021-0438 · Cited by 75
Meisler, G. (2013) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-05-2012-0041 · Cited by 83
How to Spot a Careerist Early On: Psychopathy and Exchange Ideology as Predictors of Careerism
Chiaburu, D. S., Muñoz, G. J., & Gardner, R. G. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1599-5 · Cited by 73
Kamakura, W. A. (2010) · Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing · doi:10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02033 · Cited by 72
Singh, S. K., Mittal, S., Sengupta, A., & Pradhan, R. K. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-08-2018-0504 · Cited by 80
Rungtusanatham, M. J., Ng, C. H., Zhao, X., & Lee, T. S. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00184.x · Cited by 70
“…variables are being provided by the same key informant, using the data in this manner naturally raises the concern with common method or common source bias (Avolio, Yammarino, & Bass, 1991; Doty & Glick, 1998; and Kline, Sulsky, & Rever-Moriyama, 2000 offer detailed discussions of this concern).”
MethodThe development of new products: The role of firm context and managerial cognition
Plambeck, N. (2011) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.002 · Cited by 74
Chow, I., & Liu, S. (2009) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190903239666 · Cited by 80
“In addition to self-reported perceptual measures of performance outcomes, the potential problem of common method variance cannot be avoided if all variables are collected from the same respondent in the same survey (Doty and Glick 1998).”
BackgroundVieira, V. A. (2010) · BAR - Brazilian Administration Review · doi:10.1590/s1807-76922010000100004 · Cited by 71
Authentic leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour: the role of psychological capital
Ramalu, S. S., & Janadari, N. (2020) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-03-2020-0110 · Cited by 92
A Personality‐Competence Model of Opinion Leadership
Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2012) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20547 · Cited by 70
Low, W.-S., Lee, J.-D., & Cheng, S.-M. (2012) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.06.011 · Cited by 78
Understanding non‐work relationships in developmental networks
Murphy, W. M., & Kram, K. E. (2010) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620431011094069 · Cited by 76
“This and other common methods bias ( Doty and Glick, 1998”
MethodIndividual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: Evidence from peer-report data.
Cohrs, J. C., Kämpfe, N., & Riemann, R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028706 · Cited by 70
Bases of social power, leadership styles, and organizational commitment
Pierro, A., Raven, B. H., Amato, C., & Bélanger, J. J. (2013) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.733398 · Cited by 105
“…perception rather than actually examine behavior may produce results different than those of the actual situation and be prone to social desirability bias, although some researchers have shown that common-method bias is generally not strong enough to invalidate the findings (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
ResultBaer, M. D., van der Werff, L., Colquitt, J. A., Rodell, J. B., Zipay, K. P., & Buckley, F. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0248 · Cited by 69
“Our use of four different time periods and two different sources also allowed us to combat common method bias through temporal and source separation (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2003).”
MethodThe effects of selected antecedents on the service recovery performance of frontline employees
Karatepe, O. M. (2006) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642060500358795 · Cited by 68
“This approach may have created common method variance [Doty and Glick, 1998].”
MethodCognitive Behavioral Model of Test Anxiety in a High-Stakes Context: An Exploratory Study
Segool, N. K., von der Embse, N. P., Mata, A. D., & Gallant, J. (2013) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-013-9111-7 · Cited by 82
The trouble with sanctions: Organizational responses to deviant anger displays at work
Geddes, D., & Stickney, L. T. (2010) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726710375482 · Cited by 67
“Although there is some debate as to the existence of and magnitude that CMV biases results, the general assumption is that it can be a problem in mono-method research (Doty and Glick, 1998; Spector, 1987).”
BackgroundPublic service motivation and performance: a critical perspective
Petrovsky, N., & Ritz, A. (2014) · Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship · doi:10.1108/ebhrm-07-2013-0020 · Cited by 68
“Although the degree of common-method bias in survey research varies (Bagozzi and Yi, 1990; Doty and Glick, 1998; Spector, 1994), it is a concern about 13 of the 16 existing, published studies on the PSM-performance linkage.”
BackgroundNaus, A. J. A. M. (2007) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20071012an · Cited by 70
An Empirical Taxonomy of Supply Chain Management Practices
Paulraj, A., Chen, I. J., & Lado, A. A. (2012) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/j.0000-0000.2012.01046.x · Cited by 67
Kunkel, T., Funk, D. C., & Lock, D. (2017) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2016-0166 · Cited by 75
Avoiding bias and fallacy in survey research: A behavioral multilevel approach
Ketokivi, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1011 · Cited by 76
Egan, M., Katikireddi, S. V., Kearns, A., Tannahill, C., Kalacs, M., & Bond, L. M. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301275 · Cited by 66
A business process management capabilities perspective on organisation performance
Wong, W. P., Tseng, M., & Tan, K. H. (2013) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2013.850812 · Cited by 66
“Following the guidelines suggested by Doty and Glick (1998), i.e. common method bias below 40% T o t a l Q ua lit y M a nag e m e n t 609 is deemed acceptable; in our study, the single factor test indicated that the first factor accounted for only 19.7% of the total 87% variance, thus our research…”
MethodInfluentialFrom Leadership to Citizenship Behavior in Public Organizations
Ritz, A., Giauque, D., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2014) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x14521456 · Cited by 66
Outsourcing customer support: The role of provider customer focus
Wuyts, S., Rindfleisch, A., & Citrin, A. V. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.004 · Cited by 65
“Hence, it ppears that our results are not confounded by CMV bias.3 This findng is congruent with a growing body of evidence that suggests that he degree of CMV bias is often quite low in organizational research e.g., Doty and Glick, 1998; Malhotra et al., 2006; Rindfleisch et al., 008).”
ResultPratolo, S., Sofyani, H., & Anwar, M. (2020) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2020.1786315 · Cited by 83
“Based on the CMV test results, the unrotated factor analysis showed that the first factor accounted for only 17.61% of the variance (see also Doty & Glick, 1998; Tehseen et al., 2017).”
MethodInfluentialAmunkete, S. L. N., & Rothmann, S. (2015) · Journal of Psychology in Africa · doi:10.1080/14330237.2015.1078082 · Cited by 65
“However, Doty and Glick (1998), and Johnson, Rosen, and Djurdjevic (2011) stated that common method variance is rarely strong enough to invalidate findings .”
BackgroundGetting the Most of Management Training - the Role of Identical Elements for Training Transfer
van der Locht, M., van Dam, K., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2013) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-05-2011-0072 · Cited by 64
“Moreover, single-source bias may be less problematic than commonly believed (see Doty and Glick, 1998; Spector, 2006b).”
BackgroundManaging knowledge exchange and identification in age diverse teams
Ellwart, T., Bundgens, S., & Rack, O. (2013) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-06-2013-0181 · Cited by 73
“shown that common methods bias does not automatically invalidate theoretical interpretations and substantive conclusions (Doty and Glick, 1998; Spector, 2006).”
BackgroundLatendresse, S. J., Rose, R. J., Viken, R. J., Pulkkinen, L., Kaprio, J. A., & Dick, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410802698404 · Cited by 68
“However, although common method variance is certainly an issue that warrants attention, it does not necessarily invalidate our findings (Doty & Glick, 1998 ), but future efforts to obtain more objective reports of adolescents' drinking behaviors would help to alleviate this concern.”
ResultManagement research on disabilities: examining methodological challenges and possible solutions
Dwertmann, D. J. G. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1137614 · Cited by 72
Attributions and Appraisals of Workplace Incivility: Finding Light on the Dark Side?
Marchiondo, L. A., Cortina, L. M., & Kabat‐Farr, D. (2018) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12127 · Cited by 65
“Even when common method bias exists, it does not typically invalidate significant relationships (Doty & Glick, 1998), and it can cause underestimation (not only overestimation) of relationships (Chan, 2009; Podsakoff et al., 2012).”
MethodChan, D. K. C., Fung, Y.-K., Xing, S., & Hagger, M. (2014) · Journal of behavioral medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-013-9494-9 · Cited by 62
Intersubjective Model of Value Transmission
Tam, K., Lee, S.-L., Kim, Y.-H., Li, Y., & Chao, M. M. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212443896 · Cited by 64
“One may question whether the association between parents’ perceived normative values (and personal values) and socialization values reported earlier was inflated by common method bias (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodHernández‐Linares, R., Kellermanns, F. W., & Fernández, M. C. L. (2018) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.08.001 · Cited by 68
Social capital, knowledge integration and learning in project-based organizations: a CEO-based study
Prieto, I. M., Pérez, V. M., & Martín‐Cruz, N. (2018) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-05-2017-0210 · Cited by 66
King, D. R., Bauer, F., Weng, Q. D., Schriber, S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21973 · Cited by 66
The role of interorganizational trust and organizational efficacy in family and nonfamily firms
Stanley, L. J., & McDowell, W. C. (2013) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.07.001 · Cited by 63
Grewal, R., Chandrashekaran, M., Johnson, J. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0295-9 · Cited by 63
Emotional Intelligence as Moderator of the Surface Acting—Strain Relationship
Prati, L. M., Liu, Y., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2009) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051808328518 · Cited by 63
“Several studies provide evidence for the acceptance of this assertion (Breland et al., 2007; Crampton & Wagner, 1994; Doty & Glick, 1998; Spector, 2006).”
The effects of two directions of conflict and facilitation on frontline employees’ job outcomes
Karatepe, O. M., & Kılıç, H. (2009) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642060902749716 · Cited by 62
“This practice is susceptible to common method variance (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
MethodAssessing the impact of business uncertainty on supply chain integration
Kim, M., & Chai, S. (2016) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-11-2014-0175 · Cited by 63
Wang, X., Xi, Y., Xie, J., & Zhao, Y. (2017) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-03-2017-0091 · Cited by 63
Orvis, K. A., & Leffler, G. P. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.038 · Cited by 62
de Guinea, A. O., Titah, R., & Léger, P. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.009 · Cited by 68
Cicero, L., Pierro, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2007) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.165 · Cited by 71
“Also, some researchers have shown that common method bias is not strong enough to invalidate the findings (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
ResultPsychological states and working conditions buffer beginning teachers’ intention to leave the job
Neve, D. D., & Devos, G. (2016) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1246530 · Cited by 77
“…consider that the use of self-report measures is justified in our study as the respondents were asked to express their judgment on relatively concrete attitudes and behaviour, which leaves little room for inference (cf. Doty and Glick 1998), self-reports are still sensitive to response tendencies.”
BackgroundAuthentic Leadership and Extra Role Behavior: a School Based Integrated Model
Srivastava, A. P., & Dhar, R. L. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9634-4 · Cited by 62
Sosik, J. J., Chun, J. U., & Zhu, W. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1651-0 · Cited by 75
Home Versus Host — Identifying With Either, Both, or Neither?
Lee, Y. (2010) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595809359583 · Cited by 61
“In addition to the potential biases of common method variance (however mitigated they may be; see Doty and Glick, 1998), there is a risk of inflating the intercultural effectiveness measures by the participants evaluating themselves.”
BackgroundKumar, P., Gupta, S., & Dagar, V. (2023) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2644 · Cited by 66
Pace, V. L. (2009) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109351751 · Cited by 60
“…several articles have directly addressed the impact of CMV in organizational research and whether concerns are justified (e.g., Bagozzi & Yi, 1990; Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003; Spector, 1987, 2006; Williams & Brown, 1994; Williams, Cote, & Buckley, 1989).”
BackgroundForms of Competition and Outcomes in Dual Distribution Channels: The Distributor’s Perspective
Vinhas, A. S., & Heide, J. B. (2014) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2014.0880 · Cited by 60
“Constructs that are relatively concrete, externally oriented, and verifiable tend to display lower CMV bias than constructs that are abstract, internally oriented, and nonverifiable (Doty and Glick 1998, Rindfleisch et al. 2008).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStrategic orientation and business performance
Al-Ansari, Y., Bederr, H., & Chen, C. (2015) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2015-0034 · Cited by 60
Sila, I. (2018) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2018.1458609 · Cited by 60
“Future studies should also use multiple methods to obtain better population parameter estimates and improve the generalizability of the findings (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
MethodAntecedents and consequences of flow state in e-commerce
Lee, Y. J., Ha, S., & Johnson, Z. S. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2015-1579 · Cited by 61
Bayona, J. A., Caballer, A., & Silla, J. M. P. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062336 · Cited by 60
Thurston, P. W., D’Abate, C. P., & Eddy, E. R. (2012) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21130 · Cited by 59
Factors affecting job satisfaction among acute care nurses working in rural and urban settings
Yasin, Y. M., Kerr, M., Wong, C. A., & Bélanger, C. H. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14449 · Cited by 65
Lusa, S., Miranda, H., Luukkonen, R. A., & Punakallio, A. (2014) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-014-0968-z · Cited by 59
“However, such bias is less likely in longitudinal studies (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundEffects of positive vs negative forces on the burnout-commitment-turnover relationship
Chen, C., & Yu, T. (2014) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-01-2012-0003 · Cited by 72
“The extent of this bias and its impacts on the results are debatable; we undertook procedural remedies, such as protecting respondent confidentiality and reducing item ambiguity by conducting an extensive pilot test prior to the questionnaire distribution (Doty and Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2003).”
BackgroundBryan, J. A., & Griffin, D. C. (2010) · Professional School Counseling · doi:10.5330/prsc.14.1.q447832251421482 · Cited by 59
Supervisory mentoring and newcomer innovation performance in the hospitality industry
Uen, J. F., Chang, H.-C., McConville, D. C., & Tsai, S.-C. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.02.009 · Cited by 60
Basic and Advanced Measurement Models for Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Williams, L. J., Ford, L. R., & Nguyen, N. T. H. (2004) · doi:10.1002/9780470756669.ch18 · Cited by 59
Technology Orientation, Innovation and Business Performance: A Study of Dubai SMEs
Al-Ansari, Y., Altalib, M., & Sardoh, M. (2013) · The International Technology Management Review · doi:10.2991/itmr.2013.3.1.1 · Cited by 58
“This means that common method bias did not appear to be a problem ([64]).”
MethodAmores‐Salvadó, J., Cruz‐González, J., Verde, M. D., & González‐Masip, J. J. (2021) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-06-2020-0217 · Cited by 58
Modeling ADHD Child and Family Relationships
Kendall, J., Leo, M. C., Perrin, N., & Hatton, D. C. (2005) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945905275513 · Cited by 58
“Despite this possibility, some research suggests that common method variance accounts for relatively small proportions of the observed covariation among variables (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundCollaborative Behavior and the Performance of Government Agencies
Whitford, A. B., Lee, S., Yun, T., & Jung, C. S. (2010) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2010.529378 · Cited by 62
“In addition, according to Doty and Glick ( 1998 , 377), several studies, such as Berlinger, Glick, and Rodgers ( 1988 ) and Glick, Jenkins, and Gupta ( 1986 ), conclude that “substantial common methods variance exists and that common methods bias significantly inflates the estimated job characteristics-satisfaction re…”
BackgroundA Survey of Graduate and Undergraduate Teaching Assistants
Weidert, J. M., Wendorf, A., Gurung, R., & Filz, T. (2012) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.637250 · Cited by 63
Wang, X., Zhao, Y., & Hou, L. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.008 · Cited by 67
Wang, C., Chu, Z., & Gu, W. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128591 · Cited by 58
Alvarez, S., Barney, J. B., & Bosse, D. A. (2003) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.10097 · Cited by 58
Servant leadership and paternalistic leadership styles in the Turkish business context
Öner, Z. H. (2012) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437731211216489 · Cited by 57
Beyond the trade-off and cumulative capabilities models: alternative models of operations strategy
Singh, P. J., Wiengarten, F., Nand, A. A., & Betts, T. K. (2014) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.983277 · Cited by 58
Eissa, G. M., Wyland, R. L., & Gupta, R. (2018) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.5 · Cited by 57
“Overall, it is worth noting that common method bias may not present a significant concern (see Spector, 1987, 2006; Doty & Glick, 1998), especially when research utilizes well-designed measures such as ours.”
BackgroundGupta, V. K., Niranjan, S., & Markin, E. T. (2019) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-019-00327-6 · Cited by 63
Bavık, A. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.11.014 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Doty, D. Harold
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-406
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W2168082050
- Cited by
- 1,380
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- measurement bias, construct relationships, measurement error, organizational analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review