The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?
Abstract
Methods variance and its effects are at the center of a debate in organizational science. Most of the debate, however, is focused on the prevalence of common methods variance and ignores common methods bias, or the divergence between observed and true relationships among constructs. This article assesses the level of common methods bias in all multitrait-multimethod correlation matrices published over a 12-year period in a set of six social science journals using a combination of structural equation modeling and meta-analysis. The results indicate that only 46% of the variation in measures is attributable to the constructs, that 32% of the observed variation in measures is attributable to common methods variance, and that common methods variance results in a 26% bias in the observed relationships among constructs. This level of bias is cause for concern but does not invalidate many research findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To help mitigate concerns about effects of transient sources of common method bias, we employed a lagged longitudinal design (Study 2; Doty and Glick, 1998;Podsakoff et al., 2003;Spector, 2006).”
From Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance (2023) · cites this paper as Doty and Glick, 1998
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,933
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392563 · Cited by 4,372
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03396-0 · Cited by 2,564
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1177/002224378702400307 · DOI
- Campbell, D. T., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 93
- Doty, D. H., Annual Meetings of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Doty, D. H., National Meetings of the Academy of Management
- Fiske, D. W., 1982, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research, 77
- 10.2307/256218 · DOI
- Hackman, J. R., 1980, Work redesign
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Bogacki, D. F., Armstrong, D. J., & Weiss, K. J. (2005) · The Journal of Psychiatry & Law · doi:10.1177/009318530503300304 · Cited by 20
Lee, K., Bae, J., Lee, B.-H., & Choi, J. (2019) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.001 · Cited by 22
Memili, E., Eddleston, K. A., Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., & Barnett, T. (2010) · Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth · doi:10.1108/s1074-7540(2010)0000012004 · Cited by 20
Stewardship Behavior and Creativity
Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2011) · management revue · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2011-3-274 · Cited by 24
Meaning and Measurement of Work Role Withdrawal
Harrison, D. A. (2002) · Industrial and organizational psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0599-0_5 · Cited by 20
Karatepe, O. M. (2009) · International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration · doi:10.1080/15256480903202417 · Cited by 20
Berger, R., Baldó, M. Y. I., Gómez‐Benito, J., de Quijano, S. D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2010) · Universitas Psychologica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy10-3.vhsa · Cited by 20
“It can be estimated that this inflated the results in about 26 % (Doty & Glick, 1998; Spector, 2006).”
BackgroundTriplett, S. M., & Loh, J. M. I. (2017) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12168 · Cited by 24
“The final distinction, according to Edmondson (2003), is that trust relates primarily to a dyadic relationship and psychological safety essentially is experienced within a group or team level. Despite these differences, Edmondson (1999b) acknowledges the importance of interpersonal trust in the development of team psy…”
BackgroundLau, P. Y. Y., Park, S., & McLean, G. N. (2020) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-01-2020-0007 · Cited by 23
Rapid Response Measurement: Development of a Faking-Resistant Assessment Method for Personality
Meade, A. W., Pappalardo, G., Braddy, P. W., & Fleenor, J. W. (2018) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428118795295 · Cited by 22
“While the exact nature of the extent of method effects is of some debate (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003), it is common to see larger correlations between measures using the same response format than those encountered when response formats differ (Cote & Buckley,…”
BackgroundKwong, C. C. Y., Bhattarai, C. R., Bhandari, M. P., & Cheung, C. W. M. (2023) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-12-2022-1106 · Cited by 19
Özkanlısoy, Ö., & Bulutlar, F. (2023) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics7030065 · Cited by 19
The Missing Link of Value Congruence and Its Consequences
Ryu, G. (2015) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/0091026015592233 · Cited by 23
“First, there have been empirical studies to support that common method bias may be trivial (Doty & Glick, 1998; Spector, 1987).”
BackgroundEmployee Engagement Using the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey
Byrne, Z. S., Hayes, T. L., & Holcombe, K. J. (2017) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/0091026017717242 · Cited by 20
“Method bias can occur when all responses are collected at a single time point on one instrument (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodPurwanto, P., & Kuswandi, K. (2017) · Market-Tržište · doi:10.22598/mt/2017.29.2.139 · Cited by 19
Maurer, T. J., & Lippstreu, M. (2008) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317907x266356 · Cited by 20
Leadership effectiveness: the costs and benefits of being emotionally intelligent
Lindebaum, D., & Cartwright, S. (2011) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437731111123924 · Cited by 25
“One of the gravest shortcomings of cross-sectional data is their susceptibility to introduce common method variance, which occurs when the measurement technique introduces systematic variance into the measure ( Doty and Glick, 1998”
MethodRaising the Cohesion and Vitality of Online Communities by Reducing Privacy Concerns
Pan, Y. C., Wan, Y., Fan, J., Liu, B., & Archer, N. (2017) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1234281 · Cited by 20
“People measure the impressions of others by analyzing input information, including others’ feedback [14] and visual information [22].”
BackgroundDebate: Public Value Trade-Offs and Methodological Trade-Offs
Bozeman, B. L. (2008) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00633.x · Cited by 19
Fulgence, K. (2016) · Recherche und Kataloge (Universitätsbibliothek Siegen) · Cited by 19
Role of Readiness to Change in the Relationship Between Workforce Agility and Digital Transformation
Sharma, K., Nigam, N., Jha, J. K., & Xu, X. (2024) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.345241 · Cited by 18
Ohlert, S., Laibach, N., Harms, R., & Bröring, S. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114993 · Cited by 22
Oh, S., Dong, L., Nahm, A. Y., & Yu, G. (2021) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602381.2021.1941529 · Cited by 20
“However, we still cannot completely disregard the potential problems of percept-percept inflation caused by common method bias (Doty and Glick 1998).”
MethodThe performance of entrepreneurial ventures
Jayawarna, D., Jones, O., Lam, W., & Phua, S. (2014) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-05-2014-0090 · Cited by 18
“Second, the use of two data sets allowed us to provide a time-lag between the dependent and independent variables in our regression model and this longitudinal data is important to overcome the problems of common method variance in cross-sectional research (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
MethodKaratepe, O. M., Avcí, T., & Tekinkuş, M. (2005) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1300/j073v18n01_04 · Cited by 18
Interpersonal work context as a possible buffer against age-related stereotyping
HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D. (2016) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x16001148 · Cited by 21
Do High Performance Work Systems Pay for Small Firms? an Intellectual Capital Building Perspective
Coder, L., Peake, W. O., & Spiller, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Small Business Strategy · Cited by 18
Colaco, B., & Loi, N. M. (2019) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-08-2018-1511 · Cited by 26
Abbas, W., & Wu, W. (2019) · Human Systems Management · doi:10.3233/hsm-190548 · Cited by 18
“Doty & Glick [43]notethatproceduralremediesarelesssensitiveto potentialbias.”
Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01881 · Cited by 18
Müller, S. M., Stolze, D., & Brand, M. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110334 · Cited by 17
Avanzi, L., Perinelli, E., Bressan, M., Balducci, C., Lombardi, L., Fraccaroli, F., & van Dick, R. (2021) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1868443 · Cited by 21
“However, given that our design was longitudinal, this should have reduced the risk (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundThe effect of project management dynamic capabilities on firm performance
Hermano, V., Martín‐Cruz, N., & Pajares, J. (2022) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-06-2021-0218 · Cited by 17
Better sustainability in the food supply chain through technology: a consumer perspective
Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Perotti, S. (2022) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2022.2076816 · Cited by 17
Co-creation of value in Platform-Dependent Entrepreneurial Ventures
Chandna, V., & Salimath, M. S. (2022) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-022-09574-4 · Cited by 17
“Given the significance of examining the data for Common Method Variance i.e., a systematic error variance that tends to cause observed correlations among the measure variables to differ from the population values [ 28], tests for the same were conducted.”
Ghouri, A., Akhtar, P., Venkatesh, V., Ashraf, A., Arsenyan, G., Tarba, S., & Khan, Z. (2024) · IEEE transactions on engineering management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3316119 · Cited by 12
“Furthermore, we also performed Harman’s single-factor test to assess the potential for common method bias [128], which can cause systematic measurement errors that either inflate or deflate the observed relationships between constructs, generating both Type I and Type II errors (e.g., [129], [130]).”
MethodThe Normalization of Deviant Organizational Practices: The Non-performing Loans Problem in China
Li, J., & Ng, C. K. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1710-6 · Cited by 17
“Moreover, the interactions among the firm level moderators are unlikely to be an artifact of the single-informant method, as it is unlikely any respondent would have formulated the moderating relationship in his mind when filling out the survey (Doty and Glick 1998).”
BackgroundPerformance Appraisal Satisfaction and Counterproductive Behaviors: Direct and Moderating Effects
Aleassa, H. M. (2014) · International Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.5430/ijba.v5n1p76 · Cited by 17
“Fortunately, Doty and Glick (1998) concluded that “common methods bias does affect the estimates of the correlations among substantive constructs, but not so frequently as to invalidate all research findings.”
Backgroundde Oliveira, L. S., Echeveste, M. E. S., Cortimiglia, M. N., & Gularte, A. C. (2019) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-019-00619-y · Cited by 17
Innovation and business performance
Turnbull, J., Slow, J., & Richmond, K. (2019) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 17
Chen, K.-Y., & Huan, T.-C. T. C. (2020) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-01-2020-0017 · Cited by 18
Unravelling Factors Influencing Firm Performance: Evidence from the SMEs in Tourism Industry
Samad, S. (2022) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs10030077 · Cited by 17
Lo, F., Mahoney, J. T., & Tan, D. (2011) · International Journal of Strategic Change Management · doi:10.1504/ijscm.2011.044941 · Cited by 17
“Efforts were made to collect the data with multiple sources to avoid any potential common method biases (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
MethodKubicek, A., Bhanugopan, R., & O’Neill, G. (2017) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1282535 · Cited by 19
Chai, S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12198286 · Cited by 16
Li, H., So, C., Chen, H., Wang, Y., & Sun, S. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02855-z · Cited by 16
“Self-reports measures may induce the common method bias (Podsakoff et al., 2010), we use time-lagged variable assessed to reduce common method variance (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2010).”
MethodAmoroso, D. L., & Ackaradejruangsri, P. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102529 · Cited by 16
Saxe, D. W. (2011) · Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago) · Cited by 16
Advancing Theory and Research and the British Journal of Management
Wood, G., & Budhwar, P. S. (2014) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12047 · Cited by 16
“We are also less troubled by common method variance (CMV) issues than some other journals, given that, within the methodological literature, there is a recognition that this does not necessarily terminally invalidate important research findings (Doty and Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundA Bayesian Approach to Measurement Bias in Networking Studies
Zhu, L., Robinson, S. E., & Torenvlied, R. (2014) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074014524299 · Cited by 17
“…survey items may induce a social desirability bias, meaning that respondents have a tendency to answer questions in a socially desirable way, thus producing a “common source bias” (Donaldson & Grant-Vallone, 2002; Doty & Glick, 1998; Graham & Collins, 1991; Podsakoff & Organ, 1986; Schwarz, 1999).”
BackgroundAnderson, M. H., Haar, J. M., & Gibb, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/s1833367200002327 · Cited by 16
Grødal, K., Innstrand, S. T., Haugan, G., & André, B. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.16993/sjwop.73 · Cited by 17
Effects of Task Conflict on Board Task Performance in Family Firms: The Importance of Board Openness
Kanadlı, S. B., Torchia, M., Gabaldón, P., & Calabrò, A. (2020) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100350 · Cited by 16
Baluku, M. M., Bantu, E., Namale, B., & Otto, K. (2021) · International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology · doi:10.1007/s41042-021-00051-1 · Cited by 20
Si, L., Xiong, M., Wang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2021) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106062 · Cited by 16
Social Exchange at Work and Emotional Exhaustion: The Role of Personality1
Petrou, P., Kouvonen, A. M., & Karanika‐Murray, M. (2011) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00812.x · Cited by 18
The Role of Organizational Justice and Stress in Predicting Job Burnout
Dishon-Berkovits, M. (2017) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/0894845317705469 · Cited by 18
“Moreover, several researchers hold that common method variance is more of a myth and an exception to the rule rather than a troubling concern (e.g., Doty & Glick 1998; Spector, 2006).”
BackgroundMallapragada, G., Grewal, R., Mehta, R., & Dharwadkar, R. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0411-8 · Cited by 16
Song, H. Z., & Song, Y. (2009) · Transportation Journal · doi:10.2307/25702529 · Cited by 16
Examining the empirical redundancy of organizational justice constructs
Le, H., & Pan, L. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.03.004 · Cited by 17
Outlaw, R., & Baer, M. D. (2022) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12552 · Cited by 17
“At level-1, both sender and receiver were required to complete their surveys on that day, thus providing complete data on the study variables and incorporating source separation to limit common method bias (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2003).”
Vaid, U. G. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101968 · Cited by 17
Riemenschneider, C. K., Burney, L. L., & Bina, S. (2023) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-10-2022-0156 · Cited by 15
Mu, Y., Huang, T., Saleem, N., & Hassan, A. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1385062 · Cited by 17
Saqib, Z. A., Ikram, M., & Qin, L. (2025) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-10-2024-0336 · Cited by 15
Braithwaite, J. B. (2016) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12198 · Cited by 13
“The evidence across the social sciences is now considerable that common methods can inflate correlations among variables traversed in literature reviews because of shared error variance, as Donald Campbell warned (Doty and Glick, 1998; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee and Podsakoff, 2003).”
Al-Ajlouni, M. I., Nawafleh, S., Alsari, H., Almarshad, M. N., & Tbaishat, R. (2019) · Journal of Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1142/s0219649219500448 · Cited by 18
Social network activity and contributing to an online review site
Goldsmith, R. E., Pagani, M., & Lu, X. (2013) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-jul-2012-0029 · Cited by 15
“We used three items to measure intention to contribute instead of one item as in study one in order to increase the reliability of the measure, and three different formats in order to mitigate possible bias arising from common method variance (Doty and Glick, 1998):”
MethodDoes knowledge management matter for information technology applications in China?
Lin, D., Liang, Q., Zong-ling, X., Run-tian, L., & Xie, W. (2008) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-008-9087-2 · Cited by 15
“Therefore, the common method variance problem should be dealt with, although Doty and Glick (1998) suggested that this problem may not invalidate research findings.”
BackgroundHigher Order Structure of Personality and Mental Health: Does General Affectivity Matter?
Şimşek, Ö. F. (2013) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.836527 · Cited by 15
“Doty and Glick (1998) showed that 32% of the variance in measures of organizational science could be attributable to CMV. Johnson et al. (2011) showed that this source of bias is also important in the context of higher order constructs, concluding that it causes, in the majority of cases, weaker…”
BackgroundPerceptions of psychological contract fairness of Hispanic professionals
DelCampo, R. G., & Blancero, D. M. (2008) · Cross Cultural Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13527600810892576 · Cited by 15
“Common methods bias (Doty and Glick, 1998) was another concern.”
MethodKonradt, U., Lückel, L., & Ellwart, T. (2012) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2012/948693 · Cited by 15
Schjoedt, L., & Sangboon, K. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137484956_15 · Cited by 16
Petrou, P. (2009) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 15
Saleem, A., Bashir, M., & Abrar, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.974642 · Cited by 18
Saei, E., & Liu, Y. (2023) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/00218863221148785 · Cited by 14
“However, prior literature suggests the prevalence and impact of CMV have been over-estimated (Doty & Glick, 1998; Spector, 2006), and the use of self-report measures should be assessed based on the appropriateness of such measures for the constructs of interests in the context of the study (Fox &…”
Barros‐Contreras, I., Campopiano, G., Cruz, A. D., Martín‐Cruz, N., & Barahona, J. J. H. (2023) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12572 · Cited by 14
Taleb, T. S. T., Hashim, N. B., Ahmad, S., & Bakar, L. J. A. (2024) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-03-2024-0262 · Cited by 14
Strategic, Organizational, and Cultural Fit: Effects on Performance in China‐US Joint Ventures
Heiman, B. A., Li, W., Chan, G., & Aceves, S. D. (2008) · Journal of Asia Business Studies · doi:10.1108/15587890880000410 · Cited by 14
Weber, B., Butschan, J., & Heidenreich, S. (2017) · IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) · doi:10.1109/temscon.2017.7998395 · Cited by 15
“Nonetheless, a single source bias cannot completely be avoided, although the present approach with the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods is broadly accepted in competencerelated investigations [38, 39].”
BackgroundAlessandri, G., Longis, E. D., & Cepale, G. (2021) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-021-09884-4 · Cited by 14
To What Do I Owe This Visit? The Drawbacks and Benefits of In-Role and Non-Role Intrusions
Bush, J. T., Baer, M. D., Welsh, D. T., Outlaw, R., Garud, N., & Sessions, H. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063211015288 · Cited by 17
“First, we employed both time and source separation, as research indicates that time and source separation are two of the most effective approaches for limiting common-method bias (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003).”
MethodThe role of agility in responding to uncertainty: A cognitive perspective
Kim, M.-C., & Chai, S. (2022) · Advances in Production Engineering & Management · doi:10.14743/apem2022.1.421 · Cited by 15
“By conducting an unrotated factor analysis, this research checked all the eigenvalues according to the research of Doty and Glick [68] and Podsakoff and Organ [69].”
MethodAlaybek, B., Dalal, R. S., & Dade, B. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09843-x · Cited by 22
“A time gap between the measurement of predictors and criteria is methodologically advantageous because it allows for increased confidence in causal direction and because it reduces common method variance (Doty & Glick, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2003).”
BackgroundMethodThe Relationship Between Physical Health and Meaning in Life Among Parents of Special Needs Children
Bekenkamp, J., Groothof, H. A. K., Bloemers, W., & Tomic, W. (2014) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v10i1.674 · Cited by 16
“This methodological artifact occurs when the instruments employed affect the scores that are being collected (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundAffective messages increase leisure walking only among conscientious individuals
Why, Y. P., Huang, R. Z., & Sandhu, P. K. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.022 · Cited by 15
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): A Literature Review
Halbusi, H. A., & Tehseen, S. (2017) · Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics (MJBE) · doi:10.51200/mjbe.v0i0.1078 · Cited by 14
Country and sector effects on the relationships among TQM practices and key performance measures
Sila, I. (2018) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-11-2017-0297 · Cited by 14
Lathabhavan, R. (2020) · Australian Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/1038416220935862 · Cited by 14
“These findings suggested that while method bias might be present, it should not affect results or conclusions significantly (Conger et al., 2000; Doty & Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundExternal Correlates of the MMPI-2 Content Component Scales in Mental Health Inpatients
Green, B. A., Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105284432 · Cited by 14
“The .30 adjustment, as an estimate of shared method variance, is supported by the results of two metaanalytic studies of common method variance in social science articles (Cote & Buckley, 1987; Doty & Glick, 1998).”
ResultAhmad, A. (2011) · American Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3844/ajassp.2011.1107.1115 · Cited by 15
Lance, C. E., Kavanagh, M. J., & Brink, K. E. (2002) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10501102027002007 · Cited by 14
“…regression tests of linear and interaction hypotheses, using multisource manifest indicators for each relevant construct militates against concerns over common method bias that can pose threats to the interpretation of findings when only a single measurement source is used (Doty & Glick, 1998).”
Leader-member-exchange and the workplace bully
Foster, P. J. (2012) · K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) · Cited by 14
Tsemach, S., & Shapira‐Lishchinsky, O. (2021) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/jea-06-2020-0129 · Cited by 15
Qu, Y., Xu, Z., Sun, H., & Qing-sheng, L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19127450 · Cited by 14
“To alleviate concerns about common method bias [47], we follow the extant research to collect data during May–September 2021 in two phases [48–50].”
MethodRoeck, K. D., Raineri, N., Jones, D. A., & Scheidler, S. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13006 · Cited by 15
Zheng, S., & Li, L. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104549 · Cited by 13
Madsen, D. Ø., Berg, T., Stenheim, T., Moum, J. V., Bordewich, I. O., & Storsveen, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11113120 · Cited by 13
“Another potential issues is so-called “common method bias” [67,68].”
BackgroundWang, H., Zhang, H., Xie, J., & Zheng, J. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-04080-0 · Cited by 14
“To reduce the interference of common method bias on the results of our study (Doty & Glick, 1998), the data were collected in three waves over a one-month period.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Doty, D. Harold
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-406
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W2168082050
- Cited by
- 1,380
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- measurement bias, construct relationships, measurement error, organizational analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review