Cited by 377Policing Practices and PerceptionsCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Citizen Satisfaction with Police Encounters

Skogan, Wesley G.·2005·Police Quarterly

Abstract

This article examines the character and consequences of encounters between police and residents of the city of Chicago. It describes the frequency with which they contacted the police for assistance or support and how often they were stopped by them. Follow-up questions gathered information about the character of those contacts. The analysis contrasts the effects of experiential, on-scene factors with those of race, age, gender, and language on satisfaction with encounters. It demonstrates the great importance of the quality of routine police-citizen encounters, for things that officers did on the spot dominated in determining satisfaction. The personal characteristics of city residents played an important role in shaping who was treated in this way or that and affected satisfaction primarily through on-scene actions by police.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098611104271086

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bland, N., 2000, Upping the PACE? An Evaluation of the recommendations of the Stephen Lawrence inquiry on stops and searches
  2. Bucke, T., 1997, Ethnicity and contacts with the police: Latest findings from the British Crime Survey
  3. Decker, S., 1981, Journal of Police Science & Administration, 9, 80
  4. Ekblom, P., 1982, The police response to calls from the public
  5. Homant, R., 1984, Journal of Police Science & Administration, 12, 323
  6. Langan, P, 2001, Contacts between police & the public: Findings from the 1999 national survey
  7. McCluskey, J., 2003, Police requests for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics
  8. Parsons, J., 2002, Survey Research, 33, 1
  9. Pate, A., 1976, Police response time: Its determinants and effects
  10. Percy, S., 1980, Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8, 75
  11. Quinton, P., 2000, Police stops: Decision-making and practice
  12. Reisig, M., 2002, Satisfaction with police: What matters?
  13. Skogan, W., 1989, Crime and its victims, 71
  14. Skogan, W., 2003, Fairness & effectiveness in policing: The evidence
  15. Smith, D., 1983, Police and people in London: A survey of Londoners
  16. Southgate, P., 1984, Contacts between police and public
  17. Stone, V., 2000, The views of the public on stops and searches
  18. Tyler, T., 2002, Trust in the Law
  19. Walker, D., 1972, North Carolina Law Review, 51, 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Skogan, W. G.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Skogan, Wesley G.
Venue
Police Quarterly
Published
2005-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
298-321
ISSN
  • 1098-6111 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-745X
OpenAlex
W2008344495
Cited by
377
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
35.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Police Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
police-citizen encounters, citizen satisfaction, police stops, race, age, gender, language barriers, Chicago

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review