The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future
Open accessAbstract
The Contact Hypothesis has long been considered one of psychology’s most effective strategies for improving intergroup relations. In this article, we review the history of the development of the Contact Hypothesis, and then we examine recent developments in this area. Specifically, we consider the conditions that are required for successful contact to occur (e.g. cooperation), investigate basic psychological processes that may mediate the consequent reductions in bias (e.g. decreased intergroup anxiety, increased common group representations), and explore factors that can facilitate the generalization of the benefits of intergroup contact in terms of more positive attitudes toward the outgroup as a whole (e.g. increased group salience). We conclude by outlining the contents of the contributions to this Special Issue on Intergroup Contact, highlighting common themes, and identifying findings that suggest directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001
The common ingroup identity model: recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779343000004 · Cited by 1,559
Self-citationBatson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105 · Cited by 1,463 · cited 2×
“Batson et al. (1997) found that asking participants to imagine how the other person was feeling, compared to attending primarily to the information presented, increased liking for a specific member of another group, which generalized to more positive attitudes toward the group as a whole.”
BackgroundWhy can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002) · Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.88 · Cited by 593
Self-citationKawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871 · Cited by 553
Self-citationImproving Intergroup Relations
Stephan, W., & Stephan, C. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9781452229225 · Cited by 401 · cited 1×
“An emphasis on learning new information is a critical component of multicultural education programs for improving intergroup relations (Stephan & Stephan, 2001).”
BackgroundChanging Interracial Evaluations and Behavior: The Effects of a Common Group Identity
Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C. (2001) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430201004004001 · Cited by 215
Self-citationGroup identity and intergroup relations The common in-group identity model
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G. (2004) · Advances in Group Processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(00)17002-x · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Cited by
Putnam, R. D. (2007) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x · Cited by 4,027
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002029 · Cited by 218
Self-citationHorstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00939 · Cited by 135
Implicit Attitudes and Discrimination Against People with Physical Disabilities
Dovidio, J. F., Pagotto, L., & Hebl, M. R. (2011) · Disability and Aging Discrimination · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6293-5_9 · Cited by 133
Self-citationEscandell, X., & Ceobanu, A. M. (2009) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870701846924 · Cited by 88
A Meta-Analysis of Hiring Discrimination Against Muslims and Arabs
Bartkoski, T., Lynch, E., Witt, C., & Rudolph, C. (2018) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2018.02.001 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K.
- Venue
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-21
- ISSN
- 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7188
- OpenAlex
- W2096471767
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 35.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
