Cited by 12Electronic Health Records SystemsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsMedical Coding and Health Information

Essential activities for electronic health record safety: A qualitative study

Open access
Ash, Joan S, Singh, Hardeep, Wright, Adam, Chase, Dian, Sittig, Dean F·2020·Health Informatics Journal

Abstract

Electronic health record-caused safety risks are an unintended consequence of the implementation of clinical systems. To identify activities essential to assuring that the electronic health record is managed and used safely, we used the Rapid Assessment Process, a collection of qualitative methods. A multidisciplinary team conducted visits to five healthcare sites to learn about best practices. Although titles and roles were very different across sites, certain tasks considered necessary by our subjects were remarkably similar. We identified 10 groups of activities/tasks in three major areas. Area A, decision-making activities, included overseeing, planning, and reviewing to assure electronic health record safety. Area B, organizational learning activities, involved monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting. Finally, Area C, user-related activities, included training, communication, and building clinical decision support. To minimize electronic health record-related patient safety risks, leaders in healthcare organizations should ensure that these essential activities are performed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458219833109

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ash, J. S., Singh, H., Wright, A., Chase, D., & Sittig, D. F.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Ash, Joan S
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2019-03-08
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
3140-3151
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W2920860815
Cited by
12
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (This project was supported through a subcontract f)
  • health services research and development ((CIN13-413))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, patient safety, clinical decision support, organizational learning, safety supervision, user training, healthcare leadership
MeSH terms
Communication, Humans, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Qualitative Research, Electronic Health Records, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review