Cited by 56Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesPsychology and Mental Health

Labels, Gender-Role Conflict, Stigma, and Attitudes Toward Seeking Psychological Help in Men

Wahto, Rachel, Swift, Joshua K.·2016·American Journal of Men's Health

Abstract

Despite a comparable need, research has indicated that on average men hold more negative attitudes toward psychological help seeking than women. Several researchers have suggested that the gender gap in service use and attitudes could be addressed through efforts to better market psychological services to men; however, a limited number of studies have tested this hypothesis. This study examined whether altering the labels for mental health providers (psychologist or counselor), settings (mental health clinic or counseling center), and treatments (problem or feeling focused) could result in less perceived stigma (social and self) by men. Participants, 165 male college students, were asked to read one of eight randomly assigned vignettes that described a man who was experiencing symptoms of depression and was considering seeking help. The vignettes differed in the labels that were used to describe the help that was being considered. Participants then completed measures assessing the stigma (self and social) associated with the treatment, and their preexisting experience of gender-role conflict and attitudes toward psychological help seeking. In summary, perceived stigma did not depend on the type of label that was used; however, 59% of the variance in attitudes was predicted by self-stigma (uniquely explaining 11%), gender-role conflict (uniquely explaining 10%), and social stigma (uniquely explaining 5%). Specifically, higher levels of gender-role conflict, social stigma, and self-stigma were associated with more negative attitudes toward psychological help seeking. Based on the demographics of the sample, these findings primarily have implications for Caucasian college-educated young adult men. Further limitations with the study and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1557988314561491

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wahto, R., & Swift, J. K.
Affiliations
University of Alaska Anchorage (US)
Corresponding author
Swift, Joshua K.
Venue
American Journal of Men's Health
Published
2014-12-11
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
181-191
ISSN
  • 1557-9883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9891
OpenAlex
W1992977024
Cited by
56
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Men s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
help-seeking attitudes, men, mental health stigma, self-stigma, social stigma, gender role conflict, mental health professionals, counseling centers, depression, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Men, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Stereotyping, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review