Cited by 13Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Drug Development in Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: It Takes More Than Just Good Science

Groothuis, Patrick G., Guo, Sun-Wei·2018·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

The pipelines of pharmaceutical companies are filled with thousands of promising new compounds for a plethora of indications. Yet, a close review of the drugs that have recently been in clinical trials quickly reveals that only a handful of drugs under evaluation in women with endometriosis can be genuinely qualified as truly innovative and breakthrough drugs. Why is there such an industry-wide lukewarm interest in drug research and development for endometriosis/adenomyosis? Why are pharmaceutical companies so reluctant to initiate programs or invest in academic research in endometriosis/adenomyosis? It is evident that a substantial part of the novel druggable targets originate from research in academia. However, only the pharmaceutical industry has the resources and expertise to bring drugs to patients. In other words, we are fully dependent on the pharmaceutical industry to bring new therapeutics to the market. The aim of this editorial is to make scientists from academia aware of the enormous complexity of the drug development process, the drivers that propel pharmaceutical companies to initiate new programs and to prioritize their portfolios, the value of intellectual property rights, and also about the importance of scientific rigor, predictive translational models, and biomarkers. At the same time, the pharmaceutical industry must be made aware of the enormous opportunity at hand, as the current patient population with endometriosis/adenomyosis is just the tip of the iceberg. We hope that the insights presented here will enable the endometriosis/adenomyosis research community to find ways to valorize their knowledge and attract the interest of the industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1933719118785767

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All existing drugs for treating endometriosis are hormonal, with the aim of reducing estrogen production through induction of state of pseudo-pregnancy, pseudo-menopause, or chronic anovulation, thus creating an acyclic, hypoestrogenic environment.

    “Currently, all existing drugs for treating endometriosis are hormonal74, with the aim of reducing estrogen production through induction of state of pseudo-pregnancy, pseudo-menopause, or chronic anovulation, thus creating an acyclic, hypoestrogenic environment75.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groothuis, P. G., & Guo, S.-W.
Affiliations
  • Synthon (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Groothuis, Patrick G.
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2018-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1318-1329
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W2810570322
Cited by
13
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
endometriosis, adenomyosis, drug development, pharmaceutical industry, university-industry collaboration, intellectual property, therapeutic target, translational model, biomarkers, clinical trial pipeline
MeSH terms
Drug Industry, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Research, Adenomyosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review