Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amplification of TruSeq ancient DNA libraries with AccuPrime Pfx: consequences on nucleotide misincorporation and methylation patterns

Seguin-Orlando, Andaine, Hoover, Cindi A., Vasiliev, Sergei K., Ovodov, Nikolai D., Shapiro, Beth, Cooper, Alan, Rubin, Edward M., Willerslev, Eske, Orlando, Ludovic·2015·STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/2054892315y.0000000005

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCR amplification can significantly alter library composition because DNA polymerases show preferences for templates of particular sizes and/or base composition and differ in proofreading capabilities for bypassing post-mortem DNA damage.

    “PCR, however, does not simply restore sufficient amounts of material for downstream manipulation; it can also significantly alter the library composition as DNA polymerases show various preferences for templates of particular sizes and/or base composition 150 , as well as differing in 'proofreading' capabilities for bypassing post-mortem DNA damage 48,151 .”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [151]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.2144/000114176 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/nar/gkp1163 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066948 · DOI
  5. 10.2144/000113809 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0387 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.12.013 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.015 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nprot.2013.038 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.1250368 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkt267 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/24.7.1304 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/nature08976 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.271.30.17692 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1756-0500-5-337 · DOI
  16. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  17. 10.1101/gr.122747.111 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature12323 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1101/gr.163592.113 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nrg3772 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1123360 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature11725 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/molbev/msl047 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nprot.2014.063 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1126/science.1238286 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078575 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1126/science.1236573 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/srep05559 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089676 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055950 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90713-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Ancient DNA analysis

    Orlando, L., Allaby, R., Skoglund, P., Der Sarkissian, C., Stockhammer, P. W., Ávila-Arcos, M. C., Fu, Q., Krause, J., Willerslev, E., Stone, A. C., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-020-00011-0 · Cited by 411

    Self-citation

Metadata

Authors
Seguin-Orlando, A., Hoover, C. A., Vasiliev, S. K., Ovodov, N. D., Shapiro, B., Cooper, A., Rubin, E. M., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L.
Affiliations
  • Kobenhavns UniversitetGeoGenetics, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • DOE Joint Genome InstituteLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Walnut Creek, CA, USA
  • Institute of Archaeology and EthnographyRussian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
  • Laboratory of Archaeology and Paleogeography of Central Siberia, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
  • Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
  • Australian Centre for Ancient DNA School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Venue
STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research
Published
2015-03-31
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
2054-8923
Cited by
15
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review