The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conditional variable importance for random forests
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Random forests are becoming increasingly popular in many scientific fields because they can cope with "small n large p" problems, complex interactions and even highly correlated predictor variables. Their variable importance measures have recently been suggested as screening tools for, e.g., gene expression studies. However, these variable importance measures show a bias towards correlated predictor variables. RESULTS: We identify two mechanisms responsible for this finding: (i) A preference for the selection of correlated predictors in the tree building process and (ii) an additional advantage for correlated predictor variables induced by the unconditional permutation scheme that is employed in the computation of the variable importance measure. Based on these considerations we develop a new, conditional permutation scheme for the computation of the variable importance measure. CONCLUSION: The resulting conditional variable importance reflects the true impact of each predictor variable more reliably than the original marginal approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A. (2006) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186006x133933 · Cited by 4,021
Self-citationPermutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses
(2005) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b138696 · Cited by 707
Random Forests and Adaptive Nearest Neighbors
Lin, Y., & Jeon, Y. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214505000001230 · Cited by 507
Cited by
Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016) · Test · doi:10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 · Cited by 4,149
Defining a Cancer Dependency Map
Tsherniak, A., Vazquez, F., Montgomery, P. G., Weir, B. A., Kryukov, G., Cowley, G. S., Gill, S., Harrington, W. F., Pantel, S., Krill-Burger, J. M., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.010 · Cited by 3,276
Variable selection using random forests
Genuer, R., Poggi, J.-M., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2010) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2010.03.014 · Cited by 2,619
Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0016973 · Cited by 2,583
Self-citationDefinitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning
Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900654116 · Cited by 2,167
Fisher, A., Rudin, C., & Dominici, F. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.01489 · Cited by 1,165
Yu, K.-H., Zhang, C., Berry, G. J., Altman, R. B., Ré, C., Rubin, D. L., & Snyder, M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12474 · Cited by 972
Discovering the anticancer potential of non-oncology drugs by systematic viability profiling
Corsello, S. M., Nagari, R. T., Spangler, R. D., Rossen, J., Kocak, M., Bryan, J. G., Humeidi, R., Peck, D., Wu, X., Tang, A. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-019-0018-6 · Cited by 878
Valavi, R., Guillera‐Arroita, G., Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J., & Elith, J. (2022) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1486 · Cited by 830
Interpretable Machine Learning – A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challenges
Molnar, C., Casalicchio, G., & Bischl, B. (2020) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_28 · Cited by 677
Opening the black box: the promise and limitations of explainable machine learning in cardiology
Petch, J., Di, S., & Nelson, W. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.09.004 · Cited by 552
Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G. G., & Lee, S.-I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03888 · Cited by 1,430
A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for modeling travel mode choice
Hagenauer, J., & Helbich, M. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.057 · Cited by 424
Post-fire vegetation and fuel development influences fire severity patterns in reburns
Coppoletta, M., Merriam, K. E., & Collins, B. M. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0225 · Cited by 295
Auditing black-box models for indirect influence
Adler, P., Falk, C., Friedler, S. A., Nix, T., Rybeck, G., Scheidegger, C., Smith, B., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2018) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-017-1116-3 · Cited by 280
On safari to Random Jungle: a fast implementation of Random Forests for high-dimensional data
Schwarz, D. F., König, I. R., & Ziegler, A. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq257 · Cited by 269
Muchlinski, D., Siroky, D., He, J., & Kocher, M. (2016) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpv024 · Cited by 234
Hooker, G., Mentch, L., & Zhou, S. (2021) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-021-10057-z · Cited by 264
Interpretation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models: Past, Present, and Future
Polishchuk, P. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00274 · Cited by 236
General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Models
Molnar, C., König, G., Herbinger, J., Freiesleben, T., Dandl, S., Scholbeck, C. A., Casalicchio, G., Grosse-Wentrup, M., & Bischl, B. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04083-2_4 · Cited by 211
White matter damage in frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum
Agosta, F., Scola, E., Canu, E., Marcone, A., Magnani, G., Sarro, L., Copetti, M., Caso, F., Cerami, C., Comi, G., et al. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr288 · Cited by 180
Stephens, S. L., Lydersen, J. M., Collins, B. M., Fry, D. L., & Meyer, M. D. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es14-00379.1 · Cited by 167
Sensitivity analysis methods in the biomedical sciences
Qian, G., & Mahdi, A. (2020) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108306 · Cited by 169
Lydersen, J. M., North, M. P., & Collins, B. M. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.005 · Cited by 161
Clinical prediction from structural brain MRI scans: A large-scale empirical study
Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Sabuncu, M. R., & Konukoglu, E. (2015) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-014-9238-1 · Cited by 161
An Empirical Study of Model-Agnostic Techniques for Defect Prediction Models
Jiarpakdee, J., Tantithamthavorn, C. K., Dam, H. K., & Grundy, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.2982385 · Cited by 148
Kim, D., Yoon, M., Jo, I.-H., & Branch, R. M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.023 · Cited by 151
Forward Noise Adjustment Scheme for Data Augmentation
Moreno-Barea, F. J., Strazzera, F., Jerez, J. M., Urda, D., & Franco, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci.2018.8628917 · Cited by 158
Kosaka, H., Okamoto, Y., Munesue, T., Yamasue, H., Inohara, K., Fujioka, T., Anme, T., Orisaka, M., Ishitobi, M., Jung, M., et al. (2016) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2016.152 · Cited by 117
Interpretable Anomaly Detection with DIFFI: Depth-based feature importance of Isolation Forest
Carletti, M., Terzi, M., & Susto, G. A. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105730 · Cited by 118
Adams, S. E., Arnold, D., Murphy, B., Carroll, P., Green, A. K., Smith, A. M., Marsh, P. D., Chen, T., Marriott, R. E., & Brading, M. G. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep43344 · Cited by 111
Land-surface parameters for spatial predictive mapping and modeling
Maxwell, A. E., & Shobe, C. M. (2022) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103944 · Cited by 105
A peek into the black box: exploring classifiers by randomization
Henelius, A., Puolamäki, K., Boström, H., Asker, L., & Papapetrou, P. (2014) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0368-8 · Cited by 98
Lindberg, D. S., Prosperi, M., Bjarnadottir, R. I., Thomas, J., Crane, M., Chen, Z., Shear, K., Solberg, L. M., Snigurska, U. A., Wu, Y., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104272 · Cited by 95
Jaxa-Rozen, M., & Kwakkel, J. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.011 · Cited by 91
Conceptual challenges for interpretable machine learning
Watson, D. S. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03485-5 · Cited by 87
van Bronswijk, S. C., DeRubeis, R. J., Lemmens, L. H. J. M., Peeters, F. P. M. L., Keefe, J. R., Cohen, Z. D., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719003192 · Cited by 75
Scholtens, D. M., Bain, J. R., Reisetter, A. C., Muehlbauer, M. J., Nodzenski, M., Stevens, R. D., Ilkayeva, O., Lowe, L. P., Metzger, B. E., Newgard, C. B., et al. (2016) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db15-1748 · Cited by 69
Narath, S. H., Mautner, S. I., Svehlikova, E., Schultes, B., Pieber, T. R., Sinner, F. M., Gander, E., Libiseller, G., Schimek, M. G., Sourij, H., et al. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161425 · Cited by 65
Emergent behaviour and neural dynamics in artificial agents tracking odour plumes
Singh, S. H., van Breugel, F., Rao, R. P. N., & Brunton, B. W. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00599-w · Cited by 61
Blyuss, O., Zaikin, A., Cherepanova, V., Munblit, D., Kiseleva, E. M., Prytomanova, O. M., Duffy, S. W., & Crnogorac-Jurcevic, T. (2020) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0694-0 · Cited by 67
Creagh, A. P., Hamy, V., Yuan, H., Mertes, G., Tomlinson, R., Chen, W.-H., Williams, R., Llop, C., Yee, C., Duh, M. S., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01013-y · Cited by 64
African elephants address one another with individually specific name-like calls
Pardo, M. A., Fristrup, K., Lolchuragi, D. S., Poole, J. H., Granli, P., Moss, C., Douglas-Hamilton, I., & Wittemyer, G. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02420-w · Cited by 62
Canu, E., Agosta, F., Mandic-Stojmenovic, G., Stojković, T., Stefanova, E., Inuggi, A., Imperiale, F., Copetti, M., Kostic, V. S., & Filippi, M. (2017) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.018 · Cited by 62
Twelve key challenges in medical machine learning and solutions
Ellis, R. J., Sander, R. M., & Limon, A. (2022) · Intelligence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2022.100068 · Cited by 61
Measuring the stability of results from supervised statistical learning
Philipp, M., Rusch, T., Hornik, K., & Strobl, C. (2018) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2018.1473779 · Cited by 56
Self-citationZilcha-Mano, S., Keefe, J. R., Chui, H., Rubin, A., Barrett, M. S., & Barber, J. P. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.15m10081 · Cited by 55
Response of the human gut and saliva microbiome to urbanization in Cameroon
Lokmer, A., Aflalo, S., Amougou, N., Lafosse, S., Froment, A., Tabe, F. E., Poyet, M., Groussin, M., Said-Mohamed, R., & Ségurel, L. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59849-9 · Cited by 46
Lessons and tips for designing a machine learning study using EHR data
Arbet, J., Brokamp, C., Meinzen-Derr, J., Trinkley, K. E., & Spratt, H. M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2020.513 · Cited by 46
Bracconi, M., & Maestri, M. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.125469 · Cited by 48
From observation to information: data-driven understanding of on farm yield variation
Jiménez, D., Dorado, H., Cock, J., Prager, S. D., Delerce, S., Grillon, A., Andrade Bejarano, M., Benavides, H., & Jarvis, A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150015 · Cited by 47
A scalable scheme to implement data-driven agriculture for small-scale farmers
Jiménez, D., Delerce, S., Dorado, H., Cock, J., Muñoz, L. A., Agamez, A., & Jarvis, A. (2019) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.08.004 · Cited by 47
AcME - accelerated model-agnostic explanations: fast whitening of the machine-learning black box
Dandolo, D., Masiero, C., Carletti, M., Dalle Pezze, D., & Susto, G. A. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119115 · Cited by 41
Data consistency in the English Hospital Episodes Statistics database
Hardy, F., Heyl, J., Tucker, K., Hopper, A., Marchã, M. J., Briggs, T. W. R., Yates, J., Day, J., Wheeler, A., Eve-Jones, S., et al. (2022) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100633 · Cited by 38
Spatial machine-learning model diagnostics: a model-agnostic distance-based approach
Brenning, A. (2023) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2022.2131789 · Cited by 33
Simsekler, M. C. E., Rodrigues, C., Qazi, A., Ellahham, S., & Ozonoff, A. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107416 · Cited by 30
Performance of early risk assessment tools to predict the later development of gestational diabetes
Kotzaeridi, G., Blätter, J., Eppel, D., Rosicky, I., Mittlböck, M., Yerlikaya‐Schatten, G., Schatten, C., Husslein, P., Eppel, W., Huhn, E. A., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.13630 · Cited by 27
Brenning, A. (2023) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06327-8 · Cited by 26
Wolfe, M. B., Schagat, T. L., Paulsen, M. T., Magnuson, B., Ljungman, M., Park, D., Zhang, C., Campbell, Z. T., Goldstrohm, A. C., & Freddolino, P. L. (2020) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.077362.120 · Cited by 22
Zheng, M., Tang, W., Ogundiran, A., & Yang, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114748 · Cited by 19
Lebowitz, E. R., Zilcha‐Mano, S., Orbach, M., Shimshoni, Y., & Silverman, W. K. (2021) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13386 · Cited by 19
Tebaykin, D., Tripathy, S. J., Binnion, N., Li, B., Gerkin, R. C., & Pavlidis, P. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00604.2017 · Cited by 15
Daily distracted consumption patterns and their relationship with BMI
van Meer, F., de Vos, F., Hermans, R. C. J., Peeters, P. A., & van Dillen, L. F. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106136 · Cited by 14
Testing conditional independence in supervised learning algorithms
Watson, D. S., & Wright, M. N. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-06030-6 · Cited by 13
Meierhofer, C., Tavakkoli, T., Kühn, A., Ulm, K., Hager, A., Müller, J., Martinoff, S., Ewert, P., & Stern, H. (2017) · Pediatric Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00246-017-1697-3 · Cited by 11
Comments on: A random forest guided tour
Hooker, G., & Mentch, L. (2016) · Test · doi:10.1007/s11749-016-0485-3 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A.-L., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., & Zeileis, A.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2008-07-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 307-307
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143481518
- Cited by
- 3,254
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 34.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.