Cited by 251Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismTactile and Sensory Interactions

Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production

Heinks‐Maldonado, Theda H., Mathalon, Daniel H., Gray, Max, Ford, Judith M.·2005·Psychophysiology

Abstract

The cortex suppresses sensory information when it is the result of a self-produced motor act, including the motor act of speaking. The specificity of the auditory cortical suppression to self-produced speech, a prediction derived from the posited operation of a precise forward model system, has not been established. We examined the auditory N100 component of the event-related brain potential elicited during speech production. While subjects uttered a vowel, they heard real-time feedback of their unaltered voice, their pitch-shifted voice, or an alien voice substituted for their own. The subjects' own unaltered voice feedback elicited a dampened auditory N100 response relative to the N100 elicited by altered or alien auditory feedback. This is consistent with the operation of a precise forward model modulating the auditory cortical response to self-generated speech and allowing immediate distinction of self and externally generated auditory stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00272.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-generated vocalizations elicit an N1 component of smaller amplitude than the N1 component elicited when passively listening to the same sounds.

    “Numerous electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) studies have found that self-generated vocalizations elicit an N1 component (M100 in the MEG) of smaller amplitude than the N1 component elicited when passively listening to the same sounds (Ford et al., 2007a; Curio et al., 2000; Heinks-Maldonado et al., 2005; Oestreich et al., 2015; Houde et al., 2002).”

    From Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech (2017) · cites this paper as Heinks-Maldonado et al., 2005

  • Auditory imagery during speech production might play an essential role in predicting intended speech production or providing an internal model to which auditory feedback should be matched.

    “Auditory imagery during speech production might play an essential role in predicting the intended speech production, or even providing an internal model to which the auditory feedback should be matched (Heinks-Maldonado et al., 2005).”
  • The closer the match between the predicted and experienced sensation, the greater the suppression of auditory cortex responsiveness in human subjects.

    “Our data (Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005) and data of others (Behroozmand, Karvelis, Liu, & Larson, 2009; Curio, Neuloh, Numminen, Jousmaki, & Hari, 2000; Eliades & Wang, 2003; Eliades & Wang, 2005; Heinks-Maldonado, Nagarajan, & Houde, 2006; Houde, Nagarajan, Sekihara, & Merzenich, 2002) suggest that the closer the match between the predicted and experienced sensation, the greater”

    From Anticipating the future: Automatic prediction failures in schizophrenia (2012) · cites this paper as Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinks‐Maldonado, T. H., Mathalon, D. H., Gray, M., & Ford, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Ford, Judith M.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02-09
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
180-190
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2008299010
Cited by
251
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh058262-17)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH067967, K02MH067967, MH-58262, R01MH-058262)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
auditory cortex, speech production, self-produced speech, forward model, auditory feedback, event-related potentials
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Cortex, Biofeedback, Psychology, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review