Cited by 65Connective tissue disorders researchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The functional consequences of generalized joint hypermobility: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Scheper, Mark C, de Vries, Janneke E, Juul-Kristensen, Birgit, Nollet, Frans, Engelbert, Raoul hh·2014·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH) has been found to be associated with musculoskeletal complaints and disability. For others GJH is seen as a prerequisite in order to excel in certain sports like dance. However, it remains unclear what the role is of GJH in human performance. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to establish the association between GJH and functional status and to explore the contribution of physical fitness and musculoskeletal complaints to this association. METHODS: A total of 72 female participants (mean age (SD; range): 19.6 (2.2; 17-24)) were recruited among students from the Amsterdam School of Health Professions (ASHP) (n = 36) and the Amsterdam School of Arts (ASA), Academy for dance and theater (n = 36) in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. From each participant the following data was collected: Functional status performance (self-reported Physical activity level) and capacity (walking distance and jumping capacity: side hop (SH) and square hop (SQH)), presence of GJH (Beighton score ≥4), muscle strength, musculoskeletal complaints (pain and fatigue) and demographic characteristics (age and BMI). RESULTS: GJH was negatively associated with all capacity measures of functional status. Subjects with GJH had a reduced walking distance (B(SE):-75.5(10.5), p = <.0001) and jumping capacity (SH: B(SE):-10.10(5.0), p = .048, and SQH: B(SE):-11.2(5.1), p = .024) in comparison to subjects without GJH, when controlling for confounding: age, BMI and musculoskeletal complaints. In participants with GJH, functional status was not associated with performance measures. CONCLUSION: GJH was independently associated with lower walking and jumping capacity, potentially due to the compromised structural integrity of connective tissue. However, pain, fatigue and muscle strength were also important contributors to functional status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2474-15-243

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Remvig L Engelbert RH Berglund B Bulbena A Byers PH Grahame R Juul-Kristensen B Lindgren KA Uitto J Wekre LL Need for a consensus on the methods by which to measure joint mobility and the definition of norms for hypermobility that reflect age, gender and ethnic-dependent variation: is revision of criteria for joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type indicated? Rheumatology 2011 50 1169 1171 21482540

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheper, M. C., de Vries, J. E., Juul-Kristensen, B., Nollet, F., & Engelbert, R. H.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Scheper, Mark C
Venue
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2014-07-21
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
243-243
ISSN
1471-2474 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162240522
Cited by
65
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
generalized joint hypermobility, functional status, walking capacity, Beighton score, musculoskeletal symptoms, pain, fatigue, muscle strength, physical fitness, female students, dance students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dancing, Exercise Test, Fatigue, Female, Health Status, Humans, Joint Instability, Joints, Netherlands, Pain Measurement, Physical Fitness, Multivariate Analysis, Exercise Tolerance, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review