Cited by 142Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network: facilitating research and clinical trials

Open access
Moulder, Krista L, Snider, B, Mills, Susan L, Buckles, Virginia D, Santacruz, Anna M, Bateman, Randall J, Morris, John C·2013·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) is an international registry of individuals at risk for developing autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (AD). Its primary aims are to investigate the temporal ordering of AD pathophysiological changes that occur in asymptomatic mutation carriers and to identify those markers that herald the transition from cognitive normality to symptomatic AD. DIAN participants undergo longitudinal evaluations, including clinical and cognitive assessments and measurements of molecular and imaging AD biomarkers. This review details the unique attributes of DIAN as a model AD biomarker study and how it provides the infrastructure for innovative research projects, including clinical trials. The recent design and launch of the first anti-amyloid-beta secondary prevention trial in AD, led by the related DIAN Trials Unit, also are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/alzrt213

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moulder, K. L., Snider, B., Mills, S. L., Buckles, V. D., Santacruz, A. M., Bateman, R. J., & Morris, J. C.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bateman, Randall J
  • Morris, John C
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2013
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
48
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110630889
Cited by
142
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
  • National Institute on Aging (U19AG032438)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease, mutation carriers, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, longitudinal assessment, clinical trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review