Cited by 111Health and Lifestyle StudiesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and Health

Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the ‘HEYMAN’ healthy lifestyle program for young men: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Open access
Ashton, Lee M., Morgan, Philip J., Hutchesson, Melinda J., Rollo, Megan E., Collins, Clare E.·2017·Nutrition Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In young men, unhealthy lifestyle behaviours can be detrimental to their physical and/or mental health and set them on a negative health trajectory into adulthood. Despite this, there is a lack of evidence to guide development of effective health behaviour change interventions for young men. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the 'HEYMAN' (Harnessing Ehealth to enhance Young men's Mental health, Activity and Nutrition) healthy lifestyle program for young men. METHODS: A pilot RCT with 50 young men aged 18-25 years randomised to the HEYMAN intervention (n = 26) or waitlist control (n = 24). HEYMAN was a 3-month intervention, targeted for young men to improve eating habits, activity levels and well-being. Intervention development was informed by a participatory research model (PRECEDE-PROCEED). Intervention components included eHealth support (website, wearable device, Facebook support group), face-to-face sessions (group and individual), a personalised food and nutrient report, home-based resistance training equipment and a portion control tool. Outcomes included: feasibility of research procedures (recruitment, randomisation, data collection and retention) and of intervention components. Generalized linear mixed models estimated the treatment effect at 3-months for the primary outcomes: pedometer steps/day, diet quality, well-being and several secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A 7-week recruitment period was required to enrol 50 young men. A retention rate of 94% was achieved at 3-months post-intervention. Retained intervention participants (n = 24) demonstrated reasonable usage levels for most program components and also reported reasonable levels of program component acceptability for attractiveness, comprehension, usability, support, satisfaction and ability to persuade, with scores ranging from 3.0 to 4.6 (maximum 5). No significant intervention effects were observed for the primary outcomes of steps/day (1012.7, 95% CI = -506.2, 2531.6, p = 0.191, d = 0.36), diet quality score (3.6, 95% CI = -0.4, 7.6, p = 0.081, d = 0.48) or total well-being score (0.4, 95% CI = -1.6, 2.5, p = 0.683, d = 0.11). Significant intervention effects were found for daily vegetable servings, energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods, MVPA, weight, BMI, fat mass, waist circumference and cholesterol (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The HEYMAN program demonstrated feasibility in assisting young men to make some positive lifestyle changes. This provides support for the conduct of a larger, fully-powered RCT, but with minor amendments to research procedures and intervention components required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000350426 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12937-017-0227-8

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two of the included studies reported a significant increase in daily steps, four reported a significant increase in MVPA, and two reported a significant increase in energy expenditure for the intervention group compared with control.

    “Two of the included studies [34,44] reported a significant increase in daily steps, 4 studies [30,34,36,53] reported a significant increase in MVPA, and 2 studies [45,47] reported a significant increase in energy expenditure for the intervention group compared with control.”

    From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (Estimation of treatment effect, Table 4; page not provided) support a significant increase in MVPA relative to control. They report a significant within-group increase in steps for the intervention group, but the between-group difference in steps was not significant (p = 0.191). This source is cited for both outcomes, not for the energy-expenditure finding. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A total of 26 studies were included across all meta-analyses.

    “A total of 26 studies were included across all meta-analyses [21,22,29-48,50-53].”
  • 13 studies included young adults (≤39.9 years), 15 included middle-aged adults (40-64.9 years), and 1 included adults over 65 years.

    “Thirteen studies included young adults (≤39.9 years) [30-34,37,38,42,44,46-48,50], 15 included middle-aged adults (40-64.9 years) [21,22,29,35,36,39-41, 43,45,51-54], and 1 study included adults aged over 65 years [49].”
  • 17 studies reported activity tracker adherence data, with 13 of these reporting activity tracker wear on at least 50% of the study intervention days.

    “Moreover, 17 studies reported activity tracker adherence data [21,22,30,32,34,35, 37,38,40,41,43-45,50-52,54], with 13 of these studies [21,22,30,34,35,40,41,43,44,50-52,54] reporting activity tracker wear on at least 50% of the study intervention days.”
  • 17 studies specified that participants must have regular access to the internet, a computer, tablet, and/or smartphone.

    “Furthermore, 17 studies specified that the participant must have regular access to the internet, a computer, tablet, and/or smartphone [21,30,33,35-37,39,41-47,51-53]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashton, L. M., Morgan, P. J., Hutchesson, M. J., Rollo, M. E., & Collins, C. E.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Collins, Clare E.
Venue
Nutrition Journal
Published
2017-01-13
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
2-2
ISSN
1475-2891 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2576530535
Cited by
111
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
18.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nutrition Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute (14-30)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (Senior Research Fellowship)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
young men, healthy lifestyle intervention, e-health, physical activity, diet quality, well-being, mental health, resistance training, wearable devices, Facebook support groups, intervention feasibility, treatment acceptability, PRECEDE-PROCEED, health behavior change, university students, portion control, recruitment and retention
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Adolescent, Adult, Body Weight, Diet, Feasibility Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Nutritional Status, Pilot Projects, Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review