Cited by 49Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs With Wearables: Fit for Medical Use?

Open access
Jacobsen, Malte, Dembek, Till A., Kobbe, Guido, Gaidzik, Peter W., Heinemann, Lutz·2021·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: Wearables (= wearable computer) enable continuous and noninvasive monitoring of a range of vital signs. Mobile and cost-effective devices, combined with powerful data analysis tools, open new dimensions in assessing body functions (“digital biomarkers”). Methods: To answer the question whether wearables are ready for use in the medical context, a PubMed literature search and analysis for their clinical-scientific use using publications from the years 2008 to 2018 was performed. Results: A total of 79 out of 314 search hits were publications on clinical trials with wearables, of which 16 were randomized controlled trials. Motion sensors were most frequently used to measure defined movements, movement disorders, or general physical activity. Approximately 20% of the studies used sensors to detect cardiovascular parameters. As for the sensor location, the wrist was chosen in most studies (22.8%). Conclusion: Wearables can be used in a precisely defined medical context, when taking into account complex influencing factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296820904947

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some factors discussed in other research were not or only briefly mentioned in the included studies, especially technical and legal aspects such as data security, data synching, and export.

    “Some factors discussed in other research were not or only briefly mentioned in the included studies [6,29,31], but should also be reflected, especially technical and legal aspects, such as data security [224], data synching, and export.”
  • These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research.

    “These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research [3,27,31,224,225].”
  • Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most were from Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep.

    “Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most of them are from the company Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep [3,27,31,224,225].”
  • One factor for the American-European gap may be differences in political and administrative frameworks, such as CE and FDA processes, which may result in slower certification processes for wearables and new technologies in Europe.

    “One factor may be the differences in political and administrative frameworks, for example, comparing CE and FDA processes, which may result in slower certification processes for wearables and new technologies in general [31].”
  • Although data analytic skills are needed for handling big data sets, their analysis might be extremely valuable for health research in generating new evidence.

    “Although data analytic skills are needed for handling big data sets, their analysis might be extremely valuable for health research in generating new evidence [31,225].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobsen, M., Dembek, T. A., Kobbe, G., Gaidzik, P. W., & Heinemann, L.
Affiliations
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
  • Science-Consulting in Diabetes, Neuss, Germany
Corresponding author
Jacobsen, Malte
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2020-02-17
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
34-43
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005993122
Cited by
49
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
wearable devices, vital signs monitoring, digital biomarkers, motion sensors, movement disorders, physical activity monitoring, cardiovascular parameters, wrist-worn sensors, non-invasive monitoring
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Humans, Biomarkers, Exercise, Vital Signs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review