Cited by 264Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Single-nucleus RNA-seq identifies Huntington disease astrocyte states

Open access
Al-Dalahmah, Osama, Sosunov, Alexander A., Shaik, A., Ofori, Kenneth, Liu, Yang, Vonsattel, Jean Paul, Adorjan, Istvan, Menon, Vilas +1 more·2020·Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Huntington Disease (HD) is an inherited movement disorder caused by expanded CAG repeats in the Huntingtin gene. We have used single nucleus RNASeq (snRNASeq) to uncover cellular phenotypes that change in the disease, investigating single cell gene expression in cingulate cortex of patients with HD and comparing the gene expression to that of patients with no neurological disease. In this study, we focused on astrocytes, although we found significant gene expression differences in neurons, oligodendrocytes, and microglia as well. In particular, the gene expression profiles of astrocytes in HD showed multiple signatures, varying in phenotype from cells that had markedly upregulated metallothionein and heat shock genes, but had not completely lost the expression of genes associated with normal protoplasmic astrocytes, to astrocytes that had substantially upregulated glial fibrillary acidic protein ( GFAP ) and had lost expression of many normal protoplasmic astrocyte genes as well as metallothionein genes. When compared to astrocytes in control samples, astrocyte signatures in HD also showed downregulated expression of a number of genes, including several associated with protoplasmic astrocyte function and lipid synthesis. Thus, HD astrocytes appeared in variable transcriptional phenotypes, and could be divided into several different “states”, defined by patterns of gene expression. Ultimately, this study begins to fill the knowledge gap of single cell gene expression in HD and provide a more detailed understanding of the variation in changes in gene expression during astrocyte “reactions” to the disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40478-020-0880-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-cell and single-nucleus RNAseq studies in mouse models and human brains of chronic neurodegenerative diseases have unraveled numerous stage-dependent transcriptomic states in HD, AD, and MS that do not clearly comply with A1-A2 profiles.

    “For example, single-cell and single-nucleus RNAseq (scRNAseq and snRNAseq, respectively) studies in mouse models and human brains of chronic neurodegenerative diseases have unraveled numerous stage-dependent transcriptomic states in HD74, AD75,78, and MS40 that do not clearly comply with A1–A2 profiles.”

    From Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [74]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Instead of individual markers, signatures composed of a combination of markers with specified levels of expression or relative fold-changes are required to identify astrocyte phenotypes.

    “Thus, instead of individual markers, signatures composed of a combination of markers with specified levels of expression or relative fold-changes are required to identify astrocyte phenotypes74.”

    From Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Methods section ('Supervised classification of astrocytes'; page unavailable) assigns astrocytes to states using specified expression thresholds for three genes, supporting the use of combined marker signatures. The paper does not establish the broader claim that such signatures are required, rather than individual markers, to identify astrocyte phenotypes generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only a subset, often a mix of A1 and A2 or pan-reactive transcripts, are upregulated in astrocytes from brains of study participants with HD or AD, or from several mouse models of acute injuries and chronic diseases of the CNS.

    “Importantly, only a subset, often a mix of A1 and A2 or pan-reactive transcripts, are upregulated in astrocytes from brains of study participants with HD74 or AD75,76, or from several mouse models of acute injuries and chronic diseases of the CNS42,69,76,77.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. [1]Ament SA, Pearl JR, Cantle JP, Bragg RM, Skene PJ, Coffey SR, Bergey DE, Wheeler VC, MacDonald ME, Baliga NS et al (2018) Transcriptional regulatory networks underlying gene expression changes in Huntington’s disease. Mol Syst Biol 14. 10.15252/msb.20167435 PMC5868199 29581148 · DOI
  2. [2]Arzberger T Krampfl K Leimgruber S Weindl A Changes of NMDA receptor subunit (NR1, NR2B) and glutamate transporter (GLT1) mRNA expression in Huntingtonʼs disease—an in situ hybridization study J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997 56 440 454 10.1097/00005072-199704000-00013 9100675 · DOI
  3. [3]Benraiss A, Wang S, Herrlinger S, Li X, Chandler-Militello D, Mauceri J, Burm HB, Toner M, Osipovitch M, Jim Xu Q et al (2016) Human glia can both induce and rescue aspects of disease phenotype in Huntington disease. Nat Commun 7. 10.1038/ncomms11758 PMC4899632 27273432 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Björkqvist M Wild EJ Thiele J Silvestroni A Andre R Lahiri N Raibon E Lee RV Benn CL Soulet D A novel pathogenic pathway of immune activation detectable before clinical onset in Huntington’s disease J Exp Med 2008 205 1869 1877 10.1084/jem.20080178 18625748 PMC2525598 · DOI
  5. [5]Bradford J Shin J-Y Roberts M Wang C-E Li X-J Li S Expression of mutant huntingtin in mouse brain astrocytes causes age-dependent neurological symptoms Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009 106 22480 22485 10.1073/pnas.0911503106 20018729 PMC2799722 · DOI
  6. [6]Darmanis S Sloan SA Zhang Y Enge M Caneda C Shuer LM Hayden Gephart MG Barres BA Quake SR A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level Proc Natl Acad Sci 2015 112 7285 7290 10.1073/pnas.1507125112 26060301 PMC4466750 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [7]Diaz-Castro B, Gangwani MR, Yu X, Coppola G, Khakh BS (2019) Astrocyte molecular signatures in Huntington’s disease. Sci Transl Med 11 31619545
  8. [8]Dobin A Davis CA Schlesinger F Drenkow J Zaleski C Jha S Batut P Chaisson M Gingeras TR STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner Bioinformatics 2012 29 15 21 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 23104886 PMC3530905 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [9]Faideau M Kim J Cormier K Gilmore R Welch M Auregan G Dufour N Guillermier M Brouillet E Hantraye P In vivo expression of polyglutamine-expanded huntingtin by mouse striatal astrocytes impairs glutamate transport: a correlation with Huntington's disease subjects Hum Mol Genet 2010 19 3053 3067 10.1093/hmg/ddq212 20494921 PMC2901144 · DOI
  10. [10]Gill BJ Pisapia DJ Malone HR Goldstein H Lei L Sonabend A Yun J Samanamud J Sims JS Banu M MRI-localized biopsies reveal subtype-specific differences in molecular and cellular composition at the margins of glioblastoma Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014 111 12550 12555 10.1073/pnas.1405839111 25114226 PMC4151734 · DOI
  11. [13]Hedreen JC Peyser CE Folstein SE Ross CA Neuronal loss in layers V and VI of cerebral cortex in Huntington’s disease Neurosci Lett 1991 133 257 261 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90583-f 1840078 · DOI
  12. [14]Hensman Moss DJ, Flower MD, Lo KK, Miller JRC, van Ommen G-JB, ‘t Hoen PAC, Stone TC, Guinee A, Langbehn DR, Jones L et al (2017) Huntington’s disease blood and brain show a common gene expression pattern and share an immune signature with Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 7. 10.1038/srep44849 PMC5359597 28322270 · DOI
  13. [15]Hodges A Strand AD Aragaki AK Kuhn A Sengstag T Hughes G Elliston LA Hartog C Goldstein DR Thu D Regional and cellular gene expression changes in human Huntington's disease brain Hum Mol Genet 2006 15 965 977 10.1093/hmg/ddl013 16467349 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Hsiao H-Y Chen Y-C Chen H-M Tu P-H Chern Y A critical role of astrocyte-mediated nuclear factor-κB-dependent inflammation in Huntington’s disease Hum Mol Genet 2013 22 1826 1842 10.1093/hmg/ddt036 23372043 · DOI
  15. [17]Hu P Fabyanic E Kwon DY Tang S Zhou Z Wu H Dissecting cell-type composition and activity-dependent transcriptional state in mammalian brains by massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-Seq Mol Cell 2017 68 1006 1015.e1007 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.017 29220646 PMC5743496 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [18]Jäkel S Agirre E Mendanha Falcão A van Bruggen D Lee KW Knuesel I Malhotra D Ffrench-Constant C Williams A Castelo-Branco G Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis Nature 2019 566 543 547 10.1038/s41586-019-0903-2 30747918 PMC6544546 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [19]Kiselev VY Kirschner K Schaub MT Andrews T Yiu A Chandra T Natarajan KN Reik W Barahona M Green AR SC3: consensus clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data Nat Methods 2017 14 483 486 10.1038/nmeth.4236 28346451 PMC5410170 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [20]Kolde R Vilo J GOsummaries: an R package for visual functional annotation of experimental data F1000Res 2015 4 574 10.12688/f1000research.6925.1 26913188 PMC4743157 · DOI
  19. [21]Kopylova E Noé L Touzet H SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data Bioinformatics 2012 28 3211 3217 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts611 23071270 · DOI
  20. [22]Krishnaswami SR Grindberg RV Novotny M Venepally P Lacar B Bhutani K Linker SB Pham S Erwin JA Miller JA Using single nuclei for RNA-seq to capture the transcriptome of postmortem neurons Nat Protoc 2016 11 499 524 10.1038/nprot.2016.015 26890679 PMC4941947 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [23]Labadorf A Hoss AG Lagomarsino V Latourelle JC Hadzi TC Bregu J MacDonald ME Gusella JF Chen J-F Akbarian S RNA sequence analysis of human Huntington disease brain reveals an extensive increase in inflammatory and developmental gene expression PLoS One 2015 10 e0143563 10.1371/journal.pone.0143563 26636579 PMC4670106 · DOI
  22. [24]Lake BB Ai R Kaeser GE Salathia NS Yung YC Liu R Wildberg A Gao D Fung HL Chen S Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain Science 2016 352 1586 1590 10.1126/science.aaf1204 27339989 PMC5038589 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [26]Lê S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: AnRPackage for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25. 10.18637/jss.v025.i01 · DOI
  24. [29]Lin L Park JW Ramachandran S Zhang Y Tseng Y-T Shen S Waldvogel HJ Curtis MA Faull RLM Troncoso JC Transcriptome sequencing reveals aberrant alternative splicing in Huntington’s disease Hum Mol Genet 2016 25 3454 3466 10.1093/hmg/ddw187 27378699 PMC5179942 · DOI
  25. [30]Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology 15. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 PMC4302049 25516281 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [31]Mathys H Davila-Velderrain J Peng Z Gao F Mohammadi S Young JZ Menon M He L Abdurrob F Jiang X Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease Nature 2019 570 332 337 10.1038/s41586-019-1195-2 31042697 PMC6865822 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [33]McCarthy DJ Chen Y Smyth GK Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation Nucleic Acids Res 2012 40 4288 4297 10.1093/nar/gks042 22287627 PMC3378882 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [34]McColgan P Tabrizi SJ Huntington’s disease: a clinical review Eur J Neurol 2017 25 24 34 10.1111/ene.13413 28817209 · DOI
  29. [35]McKenzie AT, Katsyv I, Song W-M, Wang M, Zhang B (2016) DGCA: a comprehensive R package for differential gene correlation analysis. BMC Syst Biol 10. 10.1186/s12918-016-0349-1 PMC5111277 27846853 · DOI
  30. [37]Mehrabi NF Waldvogel HJ Tippett LJ Hogg VM Synek BJ Faull RLM Symptom heterogeneity in Huntington's disease correlates with neuronal degeneration in the cerebral cortex Neurobiol Dis 2016 96 67 74 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.08.015 27569581 · DOI
  31. [38]Mina E, van Roon-Mom W, Hettne K, van Zwet E, Goeman J, Neri C, A.C. ‘t Hoen P, Mons B, Roos M (2016) Common disease signatures from gene expression analysis in Huntington’s disease human blood and brain. Orphan J Rare Dis 11. 10.1186/s13023-016-0475-2 PMC4968014 27476530 · DOI
  32. [40]Penkowa M Carrasco J Giralt M Moos T Hidalgo J CNS wound healing is severely depressed in Metallothionein I- and II-deficient mice J Neurosci 1999 19 2535 2545 10.1523/jneurosci.19-07-02535.1999 10087067 PMC6786080 · DOI
  33. [41]Petukhov V Guo J Baryawno N Severe N Scadden DT Samsonova MG Kharchenko PV dropEst: pipeline for accurate estimation of molecular counts in droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq experiments Genome Biol 2018 19 78 10.1186/s13059-018-1449-6 29921301 PMC6010209 · DOI
  34. [42]Pollen Alex A Nowakowski Tomasz J Chen J Retallack H Sandoval-Espinosa C Nicholas Cory R Shuga J Liu Siyuan J Oldham Michael C Diaz A Molecular identity of human outer radial glia during cortical development Cell 2015 163 55 67 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.004 26406371 PMC4583716 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [43]Robinson MD McCarthy DJ Smyth GK edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data Bioinformatics 2009 26 139 140 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 19910308 PMC2796818 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [44]Rüb U Seidel K Heinsen H Vonsattel JP den Dunnen WF Korf HW Huntington's disease (HD): the neuropathology of a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder of the human brain Brain Pathol 2016 26 726 740 10.1111/bpa.12426 27529157 PMC8029421 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [45]Rüb U, Vonsattel JPG, Heinsen H, Korf H-W (2015) The neuropathology of Huntington’s disease: classical findings, recent developments and correlation to functional Neuroanatomy. Advances in anatomy, embryology and cell biology. 217:1–146. 26767207
  38. [46]Santos CRA Martinho A Quintela T Gonçalves I Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties of metallothioneins IUBMB Life 2011 64 126 135 10.1002/iub.585 22131188 · DOI
  39. [47]Sekar S McDonald J Cuyugan L Aldrich J Kurdoglu A Adkins J Serrano G Beach TG Craig DW Valla J Alzheimer’s disease is associated with altered expression of genes involved in immune response and mitochondrial processes in astrocytes Neurobiol Aging 2015 36 583 591 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.09.027 25448601 PMC4315763 · DOI · Paper page
  40. [48]Selkoe DJ Salasar FJ Abraham C Kosik KS Huntington's disease: changes in striatal proteins reflect astrocytic gliosis Brain Res 1982 245 117 125 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90344-4 6214299 · DOI
  41. [49]Song W-M Zhang B Multiscale embedded gene co-expression network analysis PLoS Comput Biol 2015 11 e1004574 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004574 26618778 PMC4664553 · DOI
  42. [50]Sorolla MA Reverter-Branchat G Tamarit J Ferrer I Ros J Cabiscol E Proteomic and oxidative stress analysis in human brain samples of Huntington disease Free Radic Biol Med 2008 45 667 678 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.05.014 18588971 · DOI
  43. [52]Tereshchenko A Magnotta V Epping E Mathews K Espe-Pfeifer P Martin E Dawson J Duan W Nopoulos P Brain structure in juvenile-onset Huntington disease Neurology 2019 92 e1939 e1947 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007355 30971481 PMC6511077 · DOI
  44. [53]Tong X Ao Y Faas GC Nwaobi SE Xu J Haustein MD Anderson MA Mody I Olsen ML Sofroniew MV Astrocyte Kir4.1 ion channel deficits contribute to neuronal dysfunction in Huntington’s disease model mice Nat Neurosci 2014 17 694 703 10.1038/nn.3691 24686787 PMC4064471 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [55]Tsai HH Li H Fuentealba LC Molofsky AV Taveira-Marques R Zhuang H Tenney A Murnen AT Fancy SPJ Merkle F Regional astrocyte allocation regulates CNS synaptogenesis and repair Science 2012 337 358 362 10.1126/science.1222381 22745251 PMC4059181 · DOI
  46. [56]van Lookeren CM Thibodeaux H van Bruggen N Cairns B Gerlai R Palmer JT Williams SP Lowe DG Evidence for a protective role of metallothionein-1 in focal cerebral ischemia Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999 96 12870 12875 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12870 10536015 PMC23139 · DOI
  47. [57]Vonsattel J-P Myers RH Stevens TJ Ferrante RJ Bird ED Richardson EP Neuropathological classification of Huntingtonʼs disease J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1985 44 559 577 10.1097/00005072-198511000-00003 2932539 · DOI
  48. [58]Wakai M Takahashi A Hashizume Y A histometrical study on the globus pallidus in Huntington's disease J Neurol Sci 1993 119 18 27 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90187-4 8246007 · DOI
  49. [59]Wakida K Shimazawa M Hozumi I Satoh M Nagase H Inuzuka T Hara H Neuroprotective effect of erythropoietin, and role of metallothionein-1 and -2, in permanent focal cerebral ischemia Neuroscience 2007 148 105 114 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.04.063 17624681 · DOI
  50. [61]Wilkinson L ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis by WICKHAM, H Biometrics 2011 67 678 679 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01616.x · DOI
  51. [62]Wu L Li J Liu T Li S Feng J Yu Q Zhang J Chen J Zhou Y Ji J Quercetin shows anti-tumor effect in hepatocellular carcinoma LM3 cells by abrogating JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway Cancer Med 2019 8 4806 4820 10.1002/cam4.2388 31273958 PMC6712453 · DOI
  52. [63]Zamanian JL Xu L Foo LC Nouri N Zhou L Giffard RG Barres BA Genomic analysis of reactive Astrogliosis J Neurosci 2012 32 6391 6410 10.1523/jneurosci.6221-11.2012 22553043 PMC3480225 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Dalahmah, O., Sosunov, A. A., Shaik, A., Ofori, K., Liu, Y., Vonsattel, J. P., Adorjan, I., Menon, V., & Goldman, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Alfaisal University (SA)
Corresponding author
Goldman, James E.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
19-19
ISSN
2051-5960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007066794
Cited by
264
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 17 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • Hereditary Disease Foundation (19-1262)
  • Columbia University Taub Institute Innovation Award
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Huntington's disease, astrocytes, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, cingulate cortex, astrocyte phenotype, glial fibrillary acidic protein, metallothionein, heat shock genes, protoplasmic astrocyte, lipogenesis, oligodendrocytes, microglia, neuronal gene expression, CAG repeat expansion
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Astrocytes, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Huntington Disease, Male, Middle Aged, Gene Expression, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review