Cited by 1Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

UniVRse: Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of virtual reality cognitive-behaviour therapy for students with social anxiety

Open access
Hazell, Cassie M., Malinowski, Josie, Edwards, Bethany, Bergin, Aislinn D. Gómez, Berry, Clio, Flynn, Maria, Smyth, Nina, Birkett, Jo·2026·Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social anxiety is prevalent amongst university students. Cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT), and graded exposure techniques in particular, is an effective intervention for social anxiety. However, there are a number of barriers preventing the delivery of CBT to students who are socially anxious. Delivering this intervention using virtual reality (VR) can address these implementation issues. We have co-developed with a group of students a VR-CBT intervention (UniVRse) specifically for members of this student group with social anxiety. METHODS/DESIGN: The present study is a pilot randomised controlled trial conducted in the United Kingdom of the UniVRse intervention compared to a wait-list control group. The aim of the trial is to determine whether a definitive trial is justified by assessing study recruitment, retention, and acceptability, as well as establishing the effect size on the co-primary outcomes for the definitive trial sample size calculation. We aim to recruit 90 socially anxious students-45 in each trial arm. The trial will adopt a mixed-methods approach. We will collect quantitative data at baseline (T0) and post-intervention 6 weeks later (T1). We will invite participants randomised to the intervention arm to complete a qualitative exit interview. DISCUSSION: The results of this pilot trial will be used to determine whether a definitive trial is justified, and to inform the refinement of the UniVRse programme and trial procedures. In the longer term, the UniVRse intervention has the potential to be an effective and accessible psychological intervention for students with social anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05704868. Registered 30th January 2023.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40814-026-01771-4

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hazell et al. [45] found that facilitating conditions (FC), such as therapist control and environmental safety, are the primary reasons students chose technology-based interventions over real-world experiences, and comprehensively analyzed the reasons why students accept or reject digital therapeutics.

    “Moreover, Hazell et al. [45] found that facilitating conditions (FC), such as therapist control and environmental safety, are the primary reasons students chose technology-based interventions over real-world experiences, and comprehensively analyzed the reasons why students accept or reject digital therapeutics.”

    From Advancing Undergraduate Student Mental Healthcare of Social Anxiety Disorder: Evaluating the Acceptance of AR-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Through TAM-Based Constructs. (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [7]Al-Naggar RA, Bobryshev Y v, Alabsi M. Perfectionism and social anxiety among university students in Malaysia. ASEAN J Psychiatr. 2013;14(1):51–8.
  2. [24]NICE. Social anxiety disorder: recognition, assessment and treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2013. 39960994
  3. [39]Department for Business E& IS. The safety of domestic virtual reality systems: a literature review. London; 2020.
  4. [62]Elliott R, Slatick E, Urman M. Qualitative change process research on psychotherapy: alternative strategies. Psychologische Beiträge. 2001;43(3):69–111. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/openview/a0e961b9dd139438a4a8f170d5566a08/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=43472. Cited 9 Mar 2017.
  5. [70]Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance. The BMJ. 2018;2021(374):1–11. PMC8482308 34593508

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hazell, C. M., Malinowski, J., Edwards, B., Bergin, A. D. G., Berry, C., Flynn, M., Smyth, N., & Birkett, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of East London (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • University of Westminster (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hazell, Cassie M.
  • Malinowski, Josie
  • Edwards, Bethany
  • Bergin, Aislinn D. Gómez
  • Berry, Clio
  • Flynn, Maria
  • Smyth, Nina
  • Birkett, Jo
Venue
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2026-02-05
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
25-25
ISSN
2055-5784 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7127912423
Cited by
1
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Office for Students (DMH05)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
social anxiety, university students, virtual reality, cognitive behavioral therapy, graded exposure, acceptability, recruitment and retention, sample size determination, psychological intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review