Cited by 183Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Stress and Coping

The Social Ties That Bind: Social Anxiety and Academic Achievement Across the University Years

Brook, Christina A., Willoughby, Teena·2015·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Given that engagement and integration in university/college are considered key to successful academic achievement, the identifying features of social anxiety, including fear of negative evaluation and distress and avoidance of new or all social situations, may be particularly disadvantageous in the social and evaluative contexts that are integral to university/college life. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the direct effects of social anxiety on academic achievement, as well as investigate an indirect mechanism through which social anxiety might impact on academic achievement, namely, the formation of new social ties in university. The participants were 942 (71.7 % female; M = 19 years at Time 1) students enrolled in a mid-sized university in Southern Ontario, Canada. Students completed annual assessments of social anxiety, social ties, and academic achievement for three consecutive years. The results from an autoregressive cross-lag path analysis indicated that social anxiety had a significant and negative direct relationship with academic achievement. Moreover, the negative indirect effect of social anxiety on academic achievement through social ties was significant, as was the opposing direction of effects (i.e., the indirect effect of academic achievement on social anxiety through social ties). These findings highlight the critical role that social ties appear to play in successful academic outcomes and in alleviating the effects of social anxiety during university/college.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-015-0262-8

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brook, C. A., & Willoughby, T.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Brook, Christina A.
  • Willoughby, Teena
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2015-02-18
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
1139-1152
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2012414170
Cited by
183
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
social anxiety, academic performance, social ties, university students, social integration, fear of negative evaluation, social avoidance, student engagement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Social Behavior, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review