The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Educational chatbots for project-based learning: investigating learning outcomes for a team-based design course
Open accessAbstract
Educational chatbots (ECs) are chatbots designed for pedagogical purposes and are viewed as an Internet of Things (IoT) interface that could revolutionize teaching and learning. These chatbots are strategized to provide personalized learning through the concept of a virtual assistant that replicates humanized conversation. Nevertheless, in the education paradigm, ECs are still novel with challenges in facilitating, deploying, designing, and integrating it as an effective pedagogical tool across multiple fields, and one such area is project-based learning. Therefore, the present study investigates how integrating ECs to facilitate team-based projects for a design course could influence learning outcomes. Based on a mixed-method quasi-experimental approach, ECs were found to improve learning performance and teamwork with a practical impact. Moreover, it was found that ECs facilitated collaboration among team members that indirectly influenced their ability to perform as a team. Nevertheless, affective-motivational learning outcomes such as perception of learning, need for cognition, motivation, and creative self-efficacy were not influenced by ECs. Henceforth, this study aims to add to the current body of knowledge on the design and development of EC by introducing a new collective design strategy and its pedagogical and practical implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Only two studies reported chatbot use to have a non-significant effect on learning outcomes (Deveci Topal et al., 2021), cognition, motivation, and self-efficacy (Kumar, 2021).”
From Implementing the bashayer chatbot in Saudi higher education: measuring the influence on students' motivation and learning strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Kumar, 2021
In the citing paper
“Using chatbots as teaching assistants, learners significantly outperformed those in traditional classroom settings in terms of projected-based learning performance [51].”
From A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“The students were thus motivated by this learning environment that they considered important and of great benefit, which was as advocated by the learning-based chatbot technology of many studies (Pereira et al., 2019; Yueh and Chiang, 2020; Kumar, 2021; Chang et al., 2022; Troussas et al., 2022).”
From Implementing the bashayer chatbot in Saudi higher education: measuring the influence on students' motivation and learning strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Kumar, 2021
In the citing paper
“Despite recent studies (e.g., Deveci Topal et al., 2021; Kumar, 2021) that found no significant influence of chatbot use on K-12 and undergraduate students' cognition and learning achievements, the results of our study highlight the significant potential of chatbot-based learning environments in enhancing and supporting cognitive learning strategies among postgraduate students.”
From Implementing the bashayer chatbot in Saudi higher education: measuring the influence on students' motivation and learning strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Kumar, 2021
In the citing paper
“In the educational field, chatbots are increasingly adopted since they support immediate and personalized feedback (Kumar, 2021; Okonkwo & Ade-Ibijola, 2021; Winkler & Söllner, 2018).”
From Designing learning technology collaboratively: analysis of a chatbot co-design (2023) · cites this paper as Kumar, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332 · cited 5×
“Subsequently, motivational beliefs are reflected by perceived self-efficacy and intrinsic values students have towards their cognitive engagement and academic performance (Pintrich & de Groot, 1990).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMotivational beliefs, values, and goals
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 · Cited by 7,587
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024 · Cited by 3,646
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517 · cited 1×
“The need for cognition also indicates positive acceptance towards problem-solving (Cacioppo et al., 1996), enjoyment (Park et al., 2008), and it is critical for teamwork, as it fosters team performance and information-processing motivation (Kearney et al., 2009).”
BackgroundAn Overview of Chatbot Technology
Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_31 · Cited by 1,300
The interpersonal communication book
DeVito, J. A. (1976) · Cited by 799
Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger
Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862 · Cited by 770
In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction
Ciechanowski, L., Przegalińska, A., Magnuski, M., & Gloor, P. A. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.01.055 · Cited by 680
The applicability of Visible Learning to higher education
Hattie, J. (2015) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000021 · Cited by 656
WHEN AND HOW DIVERSITY BENEFITS TEAMS: THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM MEMBERS' NEED FOR COGNITION
Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41331431 · Cited by 591
Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc6020031 · Cited by 589
Unleashing the Potential of Chatbots in Education: A State-Of-The-Art Analysis
Winkler, R., & Soellner, M. (2018) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2018.15903abstract · Cited by 581
Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438 · Cited by 572
Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter?
Wei, H.-C., & Chou, C. (2020) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768 · Cited by 529
Chatbots and the new world of HCI
Følstad, A., & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2017) · interactions · doi:10.1145/3085558 · Cited by 520
Chatbot learning partners: connecting learning experiences, interest and competence
Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023 · Cited by 470
The Very Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition: Developing a Six-Item Version
Lins de Holanda Coelho, G., H. P. Hanel, P., & J. Wolf, L. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191118793208 · Cited by 358
Yin, J., Goh, T.-T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633120952067 · Cited by 349
Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2023) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426 · Cited by 343
Chatbots: changing user needs and motivations
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2018) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/3236669 · Cited by 322
Programming challenges of chatbot: Current and future prospective
Rahman, A. M., Mamun, A. A., & Islam, A. (2017) · IEEE Region Humanitarian Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/r10-htc.2017.8288910 · Cited by 268
Bringing chatbots into education: Towards natural language negotiation of open learner models
Kerly, A., Hall, P., & Susan Bull, A. (2006) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2006.11.014 · Cited by 239
A ChatBot for Learning Chinese: Learning Achievement and Technology Acceptance
Chen, H.-L., Vicki Widarso, G., & Sutrisno, H. (2020) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633120929622 · Cited by 220
Cano, E. V., Andrés, S. M., & Menéses, E. L. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00269-8 · Cited by 220
Advantages and constraints of a hybrid model K–12 e-learning assistant chatbot
Wu, E. H.-K., Lin, C.-H., Ou, Y.-Y., Liu, C.-Z., Wang, W.-K., & Chao, C.-Y. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988252 · Cited by 205
Chatbot for E-Learning: A Case of Study
Colace, F., Santo, M. D., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., Pietrosanto, A., & Lemma, S. (2018) · International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research · doi:10.18178/ijmerr.7.5.528-533 · Cited by 176
Optimizing Students’ Mental Health and Academic Performance: AI-Enhanced Life Crafting
Dekker, I., De Jong, E. M., Schippers, M. C., De Bruijn-Smolders, M., Alexiou, A., & Giesbers, B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01063 · Cited by 176
International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management
(2020) · International Journal of Research in Engineering Science and Management · doi:10.47607/ijresm · Cited by 176
The Relations Between Student Motivational Beliefs and Cognitive Engagement in High School
Walker, C. O., & Greene, B. A. (2009) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.3200/joer.102.6.463-472 · Cited by 175
Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., Annamalai, N., & Osman, S. B. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3037925 · Cited by 153
Self-citationPrivacy Concerns in Chatbot Interactions
Ischen, C., Araujo, T., Voorveld, H., van Noort, G., & Smit, E. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_3 · Cited by 152
Følstad, A., Skjuve, M. B., & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_13 · Cited by 142
Hadjielias, Ε., Dada, O. L., Cruz, A. D., Zekas, S., Christofi, M., & Sakka, G. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.045 · Cited by 131
Chatbot as an Intelligent Personal Assistant for Mobile Language Learning
Pham, X. L., Phạm, T. H., Nguyen, Q. M., Nguyen, T. H., & Cao, T. T. H. (2018) · International Conference on Education and E-Learning (ICEEL) · doi:10.1145/3291078.3291115 · Cited by 121
Han, R., & Xu, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17061883 · Cited by 115
“Openness” with and without Information Technology: A Framework and a Brief History
Schlagwein, D., Conboy, K., Feller, J., Leimeister, J. M., & Morgan, L. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0049-3 · Cited by 104
Yılmaz, R. M., & Baydaş, Ö. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9534-1 · Cited by 103
Chatbot technology: A possible means of unlocking student potential to learn how to learn
Bii, P. K. (2013) · Cited by 99
A motivational lens model of person × situation interactions in employee creativity.
van Knippenberg, D., & Hirst, G. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000486 · Cited by 94
A review of chatbots in education: Practical steps forward
Cunningham, S., Boles, W., Trouton, L., & Margerison, E. (2019) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 92
A Pilot Study Integrating an AI-driven Chatbot in an Introductory Programming Course
Verleger, M., & Pembridge, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2018.8659282 · Cited by 86
Leveraging chatbots to improve self-guided learning through conversational quizzes
Pereira, J. (2016) · Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) · doi:10.1145/3012430.3012625 · Cited by 83
Design of a chatbot as a distance learning assistant
Tamayo, P. A., Herrero, A., Martín, J., Navarro, C., & Tránchez, J. M. (2019) · Open Praxis · doi:10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1063 · Cited by 83
van Eeuwen, M. (2017) · Cited by 80
Hetényi, G., Lengyel, A., & Szilasi, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management · doi:10.3926/jiem.2929 · Cited by 79
The Effects of the Development of Metacognition on Project-based Learning
Sart, G. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.169 · Cited by 73
“Evaluation of developing educational chatbots based on the seven principles for good teaching.”
Gonda, D. E., Luo, J., Wong, Y.-L., & Lei, C.-U. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) · doi:10.1109/tale.2018.8615175 · Cited by 70
Wang, J., Hwang, G., & Chang, C. (2021) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100023 · Cited by 70
How chatbots can be involved in the education process
Ondas, S., Pleva, M., & Hladek, D. (2019) · 2019 17th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) · doi:10.1109/iceta48886.2019.9040095 · Cited by 65
Briefing Paper: Chatbots in Education
Brustenga, G. G., Alpiste, M. F. I., & Castells, N. M. (2018) · doi:10.7238/elc.chatbots.2018 · Cited by 64
MOOCBuddy: a Chatbot for personalized learning with MOOCs.
Holotescu, C. (2016) · RoCHI · Cited by 63
Evaluation Techniques for Chatbot Usability: A Systematic Mapping Study
Ren, R., Castro, J. W., Acuña, S. T., & Lara, J. D. (2019) · International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1142/s0218194019400163 · Cited by 63
Lecturer's Apprentice: A Chatbot for Assisting Novice Programmers
Ismail, M., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2019) · International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC) · doi:10.1109/imitec45504.2019.9015857 · Cited by 62
Pereira, J., Fernández-Raga, M., Osuna-Acedo, S., Roura-Redondo, M., Almazán-López, O., & Buldón-Olalla, A. (2019) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-019-09414-9 · Cited by 59
Understanding user interactions with a chatbot: a self-determination theory approach.
Nguyen, Q. N., & Sidorova, A. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 51
A Question Answering and Quiz Generation Chatbot for Education
Sreelakshmi, A. S., Abhinaya, S. B., Nair, A., & Nirmala, S. J. (2019) · Grace Hopper Celebration India (GHCI) · doi:10.1109/ghci47972.2019.9071832 · Cited by 51
Schmulian, A., & Coetzee, S. A. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12723 · Cited by 48
Chatting with Arduino platform through Telegram Bot
de Oliveira, J. C., Santos, D. H., & Neto, M. P. (2016) · IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE) · doi:10.1109/isce.2016.7797406 · Cited by 46
How Are You, Chatbot? Evaluating Chatbots in Educational Settings - Results of a Literature Review
Hobert, S. (2019) · Fachtagung "e-Learning" der Gesellschaft für Informatik · doi:10.18420/delfi2019_289 · Cited by 44
The influence of self-regulation processes on metacognition in a virtual learning environment
Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. (2018) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2018.1516628 · Cited by 39
Design of Telegram Bots for Campus Information Sharing
Setiaji, H., & Paputungan, I. V. (2018) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/325/1/012005 · Cited by 36
Need for Cognition, Task Complexity, and Job Satisfaction
Park, H. S., Baker, C., & Lee, D. W. (2008) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2008)24:2(111 · Cited by 35
Enhancing creativity in organizations: the role of the need for cognition
Pan, Y., Shang, Y., & Malika, R. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2019-0516 · Cited by 35
A systematic review of the design work of STEM teachers
Kim, M. S. (2019) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1682988 · Cited by 30
Chatbots for the Information Acquisition at Universities – A Student’s View on the Application Area
von Wolff, R. M., Nörtemann, J., Hobert, S., & Schümann, M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_16 · Cited by 30
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CHATBOT IN ONLINE HIGHER EDUCATION SETTINGS
(2018) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/4_iis_2018_44-52 · Cited by 30
Students’ Perceptions on Chatbots’ Potential and Design Characteristics in Healthcare Education
Natalia, S., Sokratis, N., Klas, K., Konstantinidis Stathis, T., Bamidis Panagiotis, D., Pattichis Constantinos, S., & Nadia, D. (2020) · Studies in Health Technology and Informatics · doi:10.3233/shti200531 · Cited by 29
Developing Chatbot For Academic Record Monitoring in Higher Education Institution
Heryandi, A. (2020) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/879/1/012049 · Cited by 28
Hobert, S., & Berens, F. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_18 · Cited by 24
DESIGNING CHATBOTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION PRACTICE
Sjöström, J., Aghaee, N., Dahlin, M., & Ågerfalk, P. J. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 23
Kumar, J. A., Silva, P. A., & Prelath, R. (2020) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09566-1 · Cited by 20
Self-citationWork-in-Progress: A Preliminary Study on Students’ Acceptance of Chatbots for Studio-Based Learning
Kumar, J. A., & Silva, P. A. (2020) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon45650.2020.9125183 · Cited by 19
Self-citationA Configurable Agent to Advance Peers’ Productive Dialogue in MOOCs
Tegos, S. D., Demetriadis, S., Psathas, G., & Tsiatsos, Τ. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_17 · Cited by 17
Cameron, G., Cameron, D., Megaw, G., Bond, R., Mulvenna, M. D., O’Neill, S. M., Armour, C., & McTear, M. (2018) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2018.153 · Cited by 16
A Chatbot for Goal-Oriented Requirements Modeling
Arruda, D., Marinho, M. B. L., Souza, E., & Wanderley, F. J. A. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_38 · Cited by 16
Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez‐Sedano, F. J., Hernández-García, Á., Gutiérrez-Fernández, A., & Guerrero‐Higueras, Á. M. (2021) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2021.05.007 · Cited by 10
Adapting the Studio Based Learning Methodology to Computer Science Education
Silva, P. A., Polo, B. J., & Crosby, M. E. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54226-3_8 · Cited by 9
Code Free Bot: An easy way to jumpstart your chatbot!
Luo, C. J., & Gonda, D. E. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale48000.2019.9226016 · Cited by 9
The development of BOT API social media Telegram about plant hormones using Black Box Testing
Rahayu, Y. S., Wibawa, S. C., Yuliani, Y., Ratnasari, E., & Kusumadewi, S. L. (2018) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/434/1/012132 · Cited by 7
Rosenstein, L. D. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119563600 · Cited by 7
AN APPROACH TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HYBRID CHATBOT FOR HANDLING STUDENTS’ COMPLAINTS
Chete, F. O. (2020) · Journal of Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Control and Computer Science · Cited by 2
Morine‐Dershimer, G. (2002) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00046-4 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Brockhus, S., van der Kolk, T. E. C., Koeman, B., & Badke-Schaub, P. G. (2014). The influence of ambient green on creative performance. Proceeding of International Design Conference (DESIGN 2014), Croatia, 437–444.
- Chan, T. J., Yong, W. K. Y., & Harmizi, A. (2020). Usage of whatsapp and interpersonal communication skills among private university students. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 3(January), 15–25.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research : Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Haristiani, N., Danuwijaya, A. A., Rifai, M. M., & Sarila, H. (2019). Gengobot: A chatbot-based grammar application on mobile instant messaging as language learning medium. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(6), 3158–3173.
- Khan, A., Ranka, S., Khakare, C., & Karve, S. (2019). NEEV: An education informational chatbot. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(4), 492–495.
- Lapina, A. (2020). Does exposure to problem-based learning strategies increase postformal thought and need for cognition in higher education students? A quasi-experimental study (Publication No. 28243240) Doctoral dissertation, Texas State University-San Marcos. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
- Riel, J. (2020). Essential features and critical issues with educational chatbots: toward personalized learning via digital agents. In: M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Handbook of research on modern educational technologies, applications, and management (pp. 246–262). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194019400163. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis
Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13334 · Cited by 576
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6 · Cited by 428
Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15042940 · Cited by 298
“19 Kumar (2021) [51] 60 (30/30) 10 weeks Teaching assistant Instructional technology Learning achievement”
BackgroundAl-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, Jeya Amantha
- ORCID
- Kumar, Jeya Amantha
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-65
- ISSN
- 2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8670881
- OpenAlex
- W4200531362
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 13
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (304/PMEDIA/6315219)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- educational chatbots, project-based learning, team design, learning outcomes, teamwork, collaboration, need for cognition, creative self-efficacy, virtual assistants, design education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
