Cited by 247Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsForgiveness and Related Behaviors

Bridging the Sciences of Mindfulness and Romantic Relationships: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda

Open access
Karremans, Johan C., Schellekens, Melanie P. J., Kappen, Gesa·2017·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

Research on mindfulness, defined as paying conscious and non-judgmental attention to present-moment experiences, has increased rapidly in the past decade but has focused almost entirely on the benefits of mindfulness for individual well-being. This article considers the role of mindfulness in romantic relationships. Although strong claims have been made about the potentially powerful role of mindfulness in creating better relationships, it is less clear whether, when, and how this may occur. This article integrates the literatures on mindfulness and romantic relationship science, and sketches a theory-driven model and future research agenda to test possible pathways of when and how mindfulness may affect romantic relationship functioning. We review some initial direct and indirect evidence relevant to the proposed model. Finally, we discuss the implications of how studying mindfulness may further our understanding of romantic relationship (dys)functioning, and how mindfulness may be a promising and effective tool in couple interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868315615450

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fincham, F. D., Bradbury, T. N., & Scott, C. K. (1990). Cognition in marriage: Retrospect and prospect. In F. D. Fincham & T. N. Bradbury (Eds.), The psychology of marriage (pp. 118-149). New York: Guilford Press.
  2. Smalley, S. L., & Winston, D. (2010). Fully present: The science, art, and practice of mindfulness. Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press.
  3. Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacri- fice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373-1395.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karremans, J. C., Schellekens, M. P. J., & Kappen, G.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Karremans, Johan C.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2016-06-23
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
29-49
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2321046344
Cited by
247
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
mindfulness, romantic relationships, couple functioning, relationship dysfunction, couple-based interventions, relational well-being
MeSH terms
Attention, Consciousness, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review